Guo Zhengliang Video highlights with English subtitles: Nicholas Kristof is a two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning American journalist at NYT said US has lost the trade war to China. 郭正亮 精選視頻: 曾兩度獲得普立茲獎的美國記者、紐約時報記者尼古拉斯·克里斯托夫表示，美國在對華貿易戰中已經輸掉了!

https://rumble.com/v713kac-nicholas-kristof-of-nyt-said-us-has-lost-the-trade-war-with-china.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8DkjDWP/

The US Trade War: China Recognizes Trump is Capable of Making Big Deals! Trump Suffers a Major defeat in the Trade War with China? 美國貿易戰, 中國認川普是可以做大買賣的美國總統! 失靈, 川普貿易戰大輸?

Here are the key details of the recent column by Nicholas Kristof in the The New York Times, titled “Trump Lost the Trade War to China” (Oct. 29, 2025). 

📌 Main thesis

Kristof argues that the United States under Donald Trump has lost its trade war with China. In his view:
• The trade war was bungled, leaving China (led by Xi Jinping) in a “significantly stronger position.” 
• The U.S. has not just lost the trade war, but also a chunk of our global credibility and influence for years to come. 
• The U.S.–China relationship, arguably the most important bilateral relationship in the world today, was mishandled. 

✏️ Representative quotes
• “We Americans may have lost not just a trade war but a chunk of our global credibility and influence for years to come…” 
• “My new column argues that President Trump bungled his trade war with China, leaving Xi Jinping in a significantly stronger position.” 

🧭 Why it matters

Kristof’s piece is significant because:
• It spells out a strategic assessment: that the trade war didn’t produce the leverage or outcome the U.S. expected.
• It connects economic policy (tariffs, trade war) to broader issues of geopolitical influence and credibility.
• It raises implications for U.S. foreign policy: if the U.S. loses influence in the world, that matters beyond economics.
• It serves as a critique of the U.S. approach to China under Trump, suggesting that the U.S. squandered an opportunity or mismanaged the strategy.

🔍 Some caveats / things to check
• This is an opinion column, reflecting Kristof’s interpretation and judgment, not a neutral empirical study.
• The column draws broader conclusions (credibility, influence) that may be harder to quantify.
• The full text of the column may require NYT access / subscription.
• The broader question of whether the U.S. “lost” the trade war is complex—and other analysts may disagree with Kristof’s framing or conclusions.