ChatGPT: Please confirm if true! Video: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has just issued a unanimous ruling, rejecting Trump’s claim of presidential immunity. All three judges agreed. There were no dissenting opinions. No oral arguments. Within 8 hours, a complete rejection. 華盛頓特區聯邦巡迴上訴法院剛剛作出一致裁決，駁回川普提出的總統豁免權主張。三名法官，全數同意。沒有反對意見。沒有口頭辯論。在 8 小時內，全面否決。

https://youtu.be/SpJBqm6Wh_Q?si=Ph4k0a–FsX787tG 👈🏿

Here’s the verified factual status of the claim you asked about:

✅ True (but with important context)

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit did unanimously reject former President Donald Trump’s claim that he has absolute presidential immunity from federal criminal prosecution.
That ruling came in connection with his criminal case involving efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. 

Key points about that ruling:
• The decision was unanimous — all three judges on the panel agreed. 
• The court affirmed a lower court decision rejecting Trump’s claim of broad immunity for actions during his presidency. 
• The opinion was substantial (a written opinion of many pages, e.g., ~57 pages). 
• The ruling said a former president is not above the law and does not enjoy blanket immunity from prosecution for federal crimes. 

So the core of the claim you asked about — that the D.C. Circuit unanimously rejected Trump’s presidential immunity argument — is correct.

以下是關於您所詢問主張的經查證事實情況：

✅ 屬實（但具重要背景脈絡）

由三名法官組成的華盛頓特區聯邦巡迴上訴法院合議庭，確實一致駁回了前總統唐納德·川普關於其享有總統絕對刑事起訴豁免權的主張。
該裁決與其涉及推翻2020年大選結果的刑事案件相關。

關於此裁決的要點：

· 裁決結果為一致通過——合議庭三名法官均表同意。
· 法院維持了下級法院駁回川普關於其總統任期內行為享有廣泛豁免權主張的裁決。
· 判決書內容詳實（書面意見達數十頁，例如約57頁）。
· 裁決指出，前任總統並不能凌駕於法律之上，也不享有針對聯邦刑事起訴的全面豁免權。

因此，您所詢問主張的核心內容——即華盛頓特區聯邦巡迴上訴法院一致駁回川普的總統豁免權論點——是正確的。