Video with English subtitles: Hunted by The New York Times for Talking About the “Kill Line”! A Chinese student in the U.S. encounters a fake bodyguard and flees back to China within 72 hours. He was allegedly hunted by anti-China Chinese extremists in the United States. These Chinese make a living by luring Chinese citizens bringing their money to the U.S., and when this Chinese student studying in America spoke the truth, he destroyed their livelihood—so, according to the narrative, he had to be “eliminated.” 影片有英文字幕: 因說了’斬殺線’遭《紐約時報》點名追殺！中國在美國留學生遇假保鏢，72小時逃回中國, 因為他被美國反中華人恨國黨追殺, 因為這些人用移民或投資顧問之名找中國人吸血，天天騙中國人來美國投資或移民. 但這位在美國的中國留學生說出真相，毀了他們飯碗，所以這個留學生必須要x, 不能讓他活著! 👉 如何証實你的朋友和親人是恨國黨，你可以做一個試驗，告訴這些人你是中國人，你愛中國，中國是你的根，我保證他們聽了後會馬上遠離你，你的飯局，你的生日會，你的Karaoke party 他們不會再來，不信你可以試試!

👉 更新報導: 最近那個代號牢A的中國醫學生，因為在網路上分享他在西雅圖當法醫助理的見聞，流浪漢和窮人的屍體是像汔車零件買賣，美國人分二種人，長生者是上層有錢人，下層人就是我們九成以上的普通人！他公告天下外竟然驚動了聯合國五常裡的四個國家！他提出的斬殺線理論，把美國底層那種短生種的絕望描繪得淋漓盡致：生病、失業、甚至修個車，就能讓你從人變成…活人是血袋，死人是零件？揭秘讓美國精英毛骨悚然的「斬殺線」與人體超市！斬殺線發明者「牢A」他是來自中國的一位醫學生逃離西雅圖實錄.

https://rumble.com/v74l8w0-hunted-by-the-new-york-times-for-talking-about-the-kill-line.html

January 17, 2026 — “Prisoner A” miraculously made it back to China alive.

This post-2000s Chinese student, who was publicly named by The New York Times for exposing the so-called U.S. “Kill Line” theory, went through an extraordinary 72 hours before returning to China. What exactly happened during those final three days? A fake bodyguard suddenly appeared, his real identity was doxxed, The New York Times allegedly named him publicly and incited a manhunt… How did he escape at the very last moment?

This is not a Hollywood movie.

This is a story that supposedly happened in January 2026.

Core content of the video:

✅ Why was “Prisoner A” targeted? What does the “Kill Line” theory actually reveal?
✅ Why would The New York Times publicly name a student?
✅ The fake bodyguard incident: who sent him, and how did “Prisoner A” see through it?
✅ The full 72-hour escape: how he avoided surveillance and successfully returned home
✅ The hidden ideological confrontation between China and the United States behind all this

An ordinary international student challenged the entire Western discourse system on his own—and came back alive. This story is more thrilling than any spy thriller.

Verified by U.S. AI ChatGPT:
Simply put, “exposing the U.S. ‘Kill Line’ theory” is not a formal academic term. Rather, it is a summary-style expression used in Chinese public discourse—especially in geopolitics, self-media commentary, and military analysis—to describe U.S. foreign strategy. It carries a tone of “exposing a conspiracy,” suggesting how the United States gradually pushes a target country toward a point of no return.

Let me break it down in plain language 👇

One-sentence version

The “Kill Line” = an invisible red line drawn by the United States for its rivals. Once you cross it—or are forced to cross it—you face comprehensive suppression until your regime, economy, or national power is effectively “decapitated.”

What does the “Kill Line” theory argue?

Its core logic usually includes five stages:

① First, “fatten you up”
• Open markets
• Technology transfer
• Financial investment and globalization dividends

👉 Let you grow rapidly and integrate into the U.S.-led system
(Many commentators say Japan, the late Soviet Union, and early China all went through this stage.)

② Allow development, but not “upgrading”
• You can be the world’s factory
• You cannot control core technologies
• You cannot challenge dollar hegemony, financial dominance, or military supremacy

👉 Growth ≠ threat; upgrading = danger

③ Draw an invisible line that must not be crossed
This line is never clearly stated, and may include:
• Technological self-reliance (semiconductors, AI, defense industries)
• De-dollarization of finance
• Independent geopolitics (disobedience)
• Moving up the industrial value chain

👉 The problem is: you usually don’t know where the line is

④ Once deemed to have “crossed the line,” the “kill” begins
A combination of measures:
• Sanctions
• Technology blockades
• Financial strangulation
• Media demonization
• Proxy wars / color revolutions

👉 The goal is not negotiation, but forcing you back into a “controllable state,” or outright collapse

⑤ Package the outcome as “values” and “order”
• Human rights
• Democracy
• International rules

👉 The result: the winners are always the rule-makers

Why is it called “exposure”?

Because this line of thinking argues:
The U.S. never admits such a line exists,
but in hindsight, countries that were attacked often followed the same trajectory.

So Chinese discourse often uses the word “expose” to mean:
👉 Laying bare the power logic behind the so-called “rules-based game”

Commonly cited examples

(These are common narratives, not factual judgments)
• 🇯🇵 Japan: “cut down” after the Plaza Accord
• 🇷🇺 Russia: NATO expansion and sanctions
• 🇮🇷 Iran: long-term blockade
• 🇨🇳 China: tech war and supply-chain war

One brutal summary

“The Kill Line isn’t about you doing something wrong—it’s about you doing too well, becoming too strong, and refusing to obey.”

⸻

If you want, I can also turn this into one of the following:
• 📺 A video narration script (self-media style)
• 🧠 A calm, academic version (de-emotionalized, strategic analysis)
• 🔥 A viral, hard-hitting version (headline + punchy quotes)

Where are you planning to use it?

2026年1月17日，牢A幸運地活著回到中國

這個因揭露美國”斬殺線”理論而被《紐約時報》點名的00後留學生，在回國前的72小時經歷了什麼？假保鏢突然上門、真實身份被開盒、《紐約時報》公開點名追殺…他是如何在最後關頭逃出生天的？

這不是好萊塢電影，這是2026年1月真實發生的故事。

影片核心內容： ✅ 牢A為什麼會被追殺？”斬殺線”理論到底揭露了什麼？ ✅ 《紐約時報》為何要公開點名一個留學生？ ✅ 假保鏢事件：誰派來的？牢A如何識破？ ✅ 72小時驚險逃亡全過程：如何避開追蹤成功回國？ ✅ 這背後隱藏的中美意識形態較量

一個普通留學生，憑一己之力挑戰整個西方話語體系，然後活著回來了。這個故事比任何諜戰片都精彩。

由美國AI ChatGPT 証實: 簡單說，「揭露美國『斬殺線』理論」不是一個正式的學術名詞，而是中文輿論圈（特別是地緣政治、自媒體、軍事評論）對美國對外戰略的一種總結式說法。它帶點「陰謀揭穿」的味道，用來形容, 美國如何一步步把某個國家逼到“必死線”。

我用白話幫你拆開來說 👇

一句話版本

「斬殺線」＝美國給對手劃的一條看不見的紅線，一旦你跨過、或者被逼跨過，就會遭遇全面圍剿，直至政權、經濟或國力被“斬首”。

「斬殺線」理論在說什麼？

它的核心邏輯通常包括 5 個階段：

① 先“養肥”你
• 開放市場
• 技術轉移
• 金融、投資、全球化紅利
👉 讓你快速成長、融入美國主導的體系

（很多評論會說：日本、蘇聯後期、中國早期都走過這一步）

② 允許你發展，但不允許你「升級」
• 可以當世界工廠
• 不可以掌握核心科技
• 不可以挑戰美元、金融、軍事霸權

👉 成長≠威脅，升級＝危險

③ 畫出「不可跨越的隱形線」

這條線不是明說的，包括但不限於：
• 科技自主（半導體、AI、軍工）
• 金融去美元化
• 地緣政治獨立（不聽話）
• 產業鏈“向上爬”

👉 問題是：你往往不知道線在哪

④ 一旦被認定“越線”，開始「斬殺」

手段是組合拳：
• 制裁
• 技術封鎖
• 金融圍剿
• 輿論妖魔化
• 代理人戰爭 / 顏色革命

👉 目標不是談判，而是讓你回到“可控狀態”，或直接崩潰

⑤ 以「價值」「秩序」包裝結果
• 人權
• 民主
• 國際規則
👉 結果：贏家永遠是體系制定者

為什麼叫「揭露」？

因為這套說法認為：

美國從不承認自己有這條線，
但事後回看，被打擊的國家幾乎都有相同軌跡。

所以中文輿論常用「揭露」來表示：
👉 把“規則遊戲”背後的權力邏輯攤開來講

常被拿來舉例的對象

（不代表事實判斷，而是常見論述）
• 🇯🇵 日本：廣場協議後「被斬」
• 🇷🇺 俄羅斯：北約東擴、制裁圍堵
• 🇮🇷 伊朗：長期封鎖
• 🇨🇳 中國：科技戰、供應鏈戰

一句總結（狠版）

「斬殺線不是你做錯了什麼，而是你做得太對、太強、太不聽話。」

如果你願意，我也可以幫你做這三種版本之一：
• 📺 影片口播稿（偏自媒體風）
• 🧠 冷靜學術版（去情緒、偏戰略）
• 🔥 狠話爆款版（標題＋金句）

你想用在哪裡？