Business Blog

China and Arab states have slammed Israel’s “continued aggression” against Palestine, including its attack on Rafah, Gaza’s southernmost city, while urging more countries to formally recognise Palestinian statehood. 中國和阿拉伯國家譴責以色列對巴勒斯坦的“持續侵略”，包括對加薩最南端城市拉法的襲擊，同時敦促更多國家正式承認巴勒斯坦國家地位.

Video: President Xi Jinping held a welcome ceremony for King Hamad bin Isa Al-Khalifa of Bahrain who is in China for the opening ceremony of the 10th Ministerial Conference of the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum and for a state visit. 習近平為來華出席中阿合作論壇第十屆部長級會議開幕式並進行國事訪問的巴林國王哈馬德舉行歡迎儀式.
https://rumble.com/v4yns7z-president-xi-jinping-held-a-welcome-ceremony-for-king-hamad-bin-isa-al-khal.html
https://www.tiktok.com/@johnsonwkchoi/video/7375147197953789227?_t=8moG37smxA6&_r=1

Video: Airdrop food and vital supplies for women and children by China in Gaza vs 2,000 pounds bombs by US & Israel. 中國向加薩的婦女和兒童空投食物和重要物資，而美國和以色列則空投 2,000 磅炸彈.
https://rumble.com/v4ynoju-airdrop-food-and-vital-supplies-for-women-and-children-by-china-in-gazaw.html
https://www.tiktok.com/@johnsonwkchoi/video/7375141862358813998?_t=8moEfHgESYY&_r=1

Video: China Turn Tables on US, Cancel US Sanctions on Russia 中國扭轉美國局面，取消美國對俄羅斯的製裁. https://www.tiktok.com/@johnsonwkchoi/video/7375136508128283947?_t=8moD3htbl9D&_r=1
Full video: https://rumble.com/v4yngw9-china-turn-tables-on-us-cancel-us-sanctions-on-russia.html

Video: How desperate is the American? They are really desperate losing in all fronts countering China’s peaceful rise. 美國人有多絕望？他們在對抗中國和平崛起的各條戰線上，確實是絕望的失敗.
https://rumble.com/v4yle22-how-desperate-is-the-american.html
https://www.tiktok.com/@johnsonwkchoi/video/7375011489725353258?_t=8mndl3Hgrdv&_r=1

The restricted items include equipment used to make aerospace parts and engines, gas turbines – which can be used in warships and tanks – as well as key components for bulletproof vests. 受限制的物品包括用於製造航空航天零件和發動機的設備、可用於軍艦和坦克的燃氣渦輪機以及防彈背心的關鍵部件.

Video: Middle East countries have finally realizes working with China is their best interests. China is there to do business for common prosperity. Whereas US promote endless wars and in return asking for protection money via arms sales, if refused will launch regime change to remove current leaders. 中東國家終於意識到與中國合作才是他們的最大利益。中國是祇是做生意尋求共同繁榮。美國提倡無止盡的戰爭，並透過出售武器的方式索取保護費，但如果拒絕，美國將發動政權更迭，推翻現任領導層。
https://rumble.com/v4yfi0c-middle-east-countries-have-finally-realizes-working-with-china-is-their-bes.html
https://www.tiktok.com/@johnsonwkchoi/video/7374778700988009770?_t=8mmaBcfrLag&_r=1

Video: “Derisking” from China means supply chains are lengthening, still by Chinese companies outside of China, not strengthening, politicians don’t understand supply chains: BIS and WSJ 來自中國的「去風險」意味著供應鏈正在延長，但仍由中國境外的中國公司控制，而不是加強，政客不了解供應鏈: 國際清算銀行和華爾街日報

https://rumble.com/v4yfdur-derisking-from-china-means-supply-chains-are-lengthening.html
https://www.tiktok.com/@johnsonwkchoi/video/7374772657792830766?_t=8mmZAEJeKq7&_r=1

Policymakers and talking heads point to new supply hubs in Mexico, Vietnam, Thailand, and East Europe as evidence that supply chains are moving out of China, and to companies in friendly countries.

But a comprehensive survey by the Bank for International Settlements, and analyses by the Wall Street Journal, indicate that it is still Chinese companies who are the primary suppliers; they have instead relocated to avoid tariffs, and to allow end buyers to pretend they are finding non-Chinese suppliers. In so doing, our supply chains now are actually MORE dependent on China, and ironically more dependent on China’s relationships with other countries, instead of just ours. Further, that the “interpositioning” of companies to trade indirectly and thereby avoid tariffs makes the supply chain more risky–not less–and much more expensive.

政策制定者和發言人指出，墨西哥、越南、泰國和東歐的新供應中心證明供應鏈正在從中國轉移到友好國家的公司。

但國際清算銀行的綜合調查和《華爾街日報》的分析表明，中國企業仍然是主要供應商；相反，他們已經搬遷以避免關稅，並讓最終買家假裝他們正在尋找非中國供應商。 這樣一來，我們的供應鏈現在實際上更加依賴中國，諷刺的是，更加依賴中國與其他國家的關係，而不僅僅是我們自己的關係。 此外，公司「介入」間接貿易從而避免關稅，使得供應鏈的風險更大（而不是更少），而且成本更高。

Video: China is ready to work with the Arab side to put in place the following “five cooperation frameworks” to step up the building of a China-Arab community with a shared future. 中方願與阿方共同落實以下“五個合作框架”，並推動建構中阿命運共同體.

https://rumble.com/v4ydn6b-china-is-ready-to-work-with-the-arab-side.html
https://www.tiktok.com/@johnsonwkchoi/video/7374675144867892522?_t=8mm5cWpsBpP&_r=1

1⃣ A more dynamic framework for innovation. China will build with the Arab side ten joint laboratories in such areas as life and health, AI, green and low-carbon development, modern agriculture, and space and information technology. We also stand ready to build with the Arab side a joint space debris observation center and a Beidou application, cooperation and development center.

2⃣ An expanded framework for investment and finance cooperation. We are ready to establish with the Arab side an industry and investment cooperation forum, and continue to expand the China-Arab states interbank association. China is also ready to deepen exchanges and cooperation on central bank digital currency with the Arab side.

3⃣ A more multifaceted framework for energy cooperation. China will further enhance strategic cooperation with the Arab side on oil and gas, and integrate supply security with market security. China is ready to work with the Arab side on new energy technology R&D and equipment production.

4⃣ A more balanced framework for mutually beneficial economic and trade ties. China will continue to implement vigorously the development cooperation projects with a total worth of RMB3 billion yuan. It stands ready to accelerate the negotiations on bilateral and regional free trade agreements and advance the dialogue mechanism for e-commerce cooperation. It welcomes active participation of the Arab side in the China International Import Expo.

5⃣ A broader framework for people-to-people exchanges. China is ready to establish with the Arab side the China-Arab Center of Global Civilization Initiative. China will invite 200 leaders of Arab political parties to visit China every year. We plan to work with the Arab side to achieve the goal of 10 million two-way visits of tourists in the next five years.

Video: Multi-year study reveals media like Financial Times, BBC, The Economist, The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph etc have deep anti-China bias 多年研究顯示，《金融時報》、BBC、《經濟學人》、《衛報》、《每日電訊報》等媒體存在嚴重的反華偏見

https://rumble.com/v4yd465-multi-year-study-reveals-western-media-have-deep-anti-china-bias.html
https://www.tiktok.com/@johnsonwkchoi/video/7374643953628368171?_t=8mlxGWd40YJ&_r=1

MULTI-YEAR DATA STUDY SHOWS DEEP MEDIA BIAS AGAINST CHINA. The international media is stunningly biased against China, data from a multi-year study has confirmed.

Out of 133 lengthy analyses of China in the Financial Times “Big Read” column over a four-year period, only two articles presented China positively, researchers in Hong Kong and London discovered.

Separate studies of the Guardian and the BBC showed that 90% of China stories were negatively framed.

In the researched period to July 2021, there were 576 reports on China in the UK Telegraph, of which only 2.5% took a positive stance.

ALMOST NO POSITIVE COVERAGE
In general, news media almost never published a positive report about the country, said the analysis of reports in the Telegraph, the Guardian, the BBC, the Financial Times and the Economist.

The result was that the public received a misleading image of the country, said the study by Dr Tim Summers, who led the research project involving Hong Kong and UK academic institutions.

“The British media texts researched for this paper contain almost no positive coverage of China,” Dr Summers’ paper says. “This will not come as a surprise to many readers.”

The bias of western mainstream media’s coverage of China is widely known. But Dr Summers’ team at Hong Kong’s Chinese University and London’s Lau China Institute (part of King’s College) enables a data-based look at the problem.

多年數據研究顯示媒體對中國有深刻偏見。一項多年研究的數據證實，國際媒體對中國有著驚人的偏見。

香港和倫敦的研究人員發現，英國《金融時報》「Big Read」專欄四年來對中國進行了 133 篇長篇分析，其中只有兩篇文章對中國進行了積極正面的報道。

英國衛報和英國廣播公司的單獨研究表明，90%的中國報道都受到負面陷害。

截至2021年7月的研究期間，英國《電訊報》共發表了576篇有關中國的報道，其中只有2.5%持正面立場。

幾乎沒有正面報道
對《電訊報》、《衛報》、BBC、《金融時報》和《經濟學人》的報導進行分析後發現，總體而言，新聞媒體幾乎從未發表過有關該國的正面報導。

領導這項涉及香港和英國學術機構的研究計畫的蒂姆·薩默斯博士的研究表明，結果是公眾對這個國家產生了誤導性的形象。

薩默斯博士的論文稱：“本文研究的英國媒體文本幾乎不包含對中國的正面報導。” “這對許多讀者來說不會感到驚訝。”

西方主流媒體對中國報導的偏見是眾所周知的。但薩默斯博士在香港中文大學和倫敦劉中國研究院（國王學院的一部分）的團隊能夠基於數據來看待這個問題.