American logistic expert report from China video: China and Norway revolutionize hybrid solar fish farming: why it can work everywhere 美國物流尊家在中國報導，影片有英文字幕: 中挪開創太陽能漁業混養新模式：為何全球皆可複製
Chinese engineers developed a transformative approach to fish farming, by installing bifacial solar panels above the ponds.
The hybrid farm now produces clean power for 40,000 homes, with substantial improvements in aquacultural yields.
Engineers in Norway applied some of the same techniques to build the world’s Northernmost fish farm. Even though the area receives little sunlight for much of the year, the solar setup displaced 90% of the farm’s diesel fuel needs.
Video: Don’t care about the China-U.S. rivalry? Don’t be naive! The people of Ukraine once thought the same way! What we care about most is the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation! 不关心中美博弈？别傻了！当年的乌克兰人也是这么想的! 我們最關心的是中華民族偉大復興!
Although Western media continues to cover it up, Ukraine’s defeat is already certain. Trump’s pressure and the cession of territory for peace—this is the price of “naivety.”
Many say, “I don’t care about grand narratives; I only care about my small, certain happiness.” After watching this video, reality will slap you hard in the face.
In this world of survival of the fittest, an individual’s fate can never be separated from the nation’s destiny.
Why can “Odysseus,” who works 16 hours a day, only earn 10 dollars, while the French can lie flat and still get high salaries?
Why, 30 years ago, Chinese workers were forced to kneel in South Korean factories, but today, no one dares to make us kneel?
There is only one answer: Dignity exists only under the sharp edge of the sword, and justice only within the range of artillery.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Warns: Face the Consequences for Rejecting Rare Earths… While wanting to benefit from China’s rare earth resources, the U.S. is unwilling to abandon its tactics of containment and suppression. This “have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too” mentality is clearly unrealistic. 美國財長警告：拒絕稀土後果自負…美方一邊想享受中國稀土的紅利，一邊不願放棄遏制打壓的手段，這種“既要又要”的心態顯然不切實際。
Rare earths are not an unconditional “free lunch” that can be taken for granted. The essence of trade cooperation is mutual benefit and win-win outcomes, not one-sided demands where one party takes whatever it wants.
The U.S. government hopes to reach a rare earth agreement with China before Thanksgiving (November 27), but the Chinese government has not acted according to U.S. expectations. Trade cooperation has never been about unilateral imposition.
The urgency on the U.S. side has its reasons: Rare earths are known as “industrial gold.” From F-35 fighter jets to Aegis destroyers, advanced U.S. military equipment relies on them. The U.S. depends on imports for 80% of its rare earths, and for key varieties such as dysprosium and samarium, refining relies 99% on China.
Currently, the rare earth inventories of U.S. defense companies can only last for three months. This is why the U.S. Treasury Secretary is anxious to make statements and even resort to threats of “retaliatory measures.” But they forget that China not only accounts for 70% of global rare earth extraction but also over 90% of processing capacity. This advantage in the industrial chain cannot be replaced in the short term.
China is not unwilling to cooperate, but cooperation requires reciprocal sincerity. If the U.S. wants stable rare earth supplies, it must first abandon its obsession with unilateral sanctions—lifting unreasonable restrictions on Chinese companies and stopping the blockade and suppression in the high-end chip sector. This is the basic premise of economic and trade exchanges.
More importantly, the U.S. must respect China’s core interests and explicitly commit to non-interference in China’s cause of unification, which is a non-negotiable red line. As for Lockheed Martin and Raytheon, they have been included in the Unreliable Entity List due to repeated arms sales to Taiwan. The fines, equivalent to twice the value of the arms sales, are penalties imposed in accordance with laws and regulations. Fulfilling the payment obligation is a necessary condition for restoring cooperation.
It is worth mentioning that China’s regulation of rare earth exports is in line with international practices. The new export control rules set to take effect in 2025, which explicitly regulate overseas products containing more than 0.1% of rare earths of Chinese origin, are a reciprocal response to the U.S. “direct product rule.” The aim is to prevent strategic resources from being used for activities that harm national security.
This control is not a “blockade” but responsible governance, safeguarding both domestic ecological and resource security and maintaining the stability and order of the global supply chain.
Xi Jinping has taken the initiative, holding an important one-hour phone call with Donald Trump, with the core focus on the Taiwan issue. He reiterated that Taiwan’s return to China is a key component of the post–World War II international order. During the call, Trump sent a rare signal that he “understands the importance of the Taiwan issue to China,” drawing intense international attention.
What shocked Tokyo even more was this—Trump then urgently called Sanae Takaichi, causing an uproar in Japanese politics. The massive impact created by the U.S.-China leaders’ discussions on Taiwan, the postwar order, and China–Japan relations has pushed Japan into a state of anxiety about becoming “marginalized.”
China emphasized the need to safeguard the victory of World War II and reminded that China and the United States once fought side by side against fascism. Meanwhile, Japan’s right-wing forces continue to provoke Beijing’s red line, making the current situation even more sensitive.
🔥 This video provides a full analysis of:
Xi Jinping’s real motives in taking the initiative
Why the Xi–Trump call focused on Taiwan
Why Trump suddenly softened his stance on the Taiwan issue
Why Sanae Takaichi was singled out—and why Japan exploded over it
The postwar international order being pulled back onto the table
The deeper meaning of the Taiwan issue, the Potsdam Declaration, and the Cairo Declaration
A joint warning from China and the U.S. to Japan’s right wing
The Taiwan Strait nearing a critical point—how the coming months may reshape the landscape
The triangular relationship between China, the U.S., and Japan is undergoing a pivotal shift. This episode helps you understand the grand strategic game behind it all!
Xi Jinping Holds Phone Call with U.S. President Donald Trump
People’s Daily (November 25, 2025, Page 01)
Xinhua, Beijing, November 24 — On the evening of November 24, President Xi Jinping spoke by phone with U.S. President Donald Trump.
Xi Jinping noted that last month, the two leaders successfully held a meeting in Busan, South Korea, during which many important consensuses were reached. This meeting helped set the course and inject momentum into the steady advancement of the “giant vessel” of China–U.S. relations, while also sending a positive signal to the world. Since the Busan meeting, China–U.S. relations have generally remained stable and improved, and this has been widely welcomed by both countries and the international community. Facts have once again demonstrated that “China and the U.S. both benefit from cooperation and both lose from confrontation” is a truth repeatedly proven by practice, and that “mutual achievement and shared prosperity” between China and the U.S. is a visible and tangible reality. Both sides should maintain this momentum, stay on the right course, uphold equality, respect, and reciprocity, expand the list of cooperation, reduce the list of problems, strive for more positive progress, open up new space for cooperation, and better benefit the peoples of both countries and the world.
Xi Jinping elaborated on China’s principled position regarding the Taiwan issue, emphasizing that Taiwan’s return to China is an important component of the post–World War II international order. China and the United States once fought side by side against fascism and militarism, and at present, the two countries should work together to safeguard the victory of World War II.
Trump stated that President Xi is a great leader. He said that his meeting with Xi in Busan was very pleasant and that he fully agrees with Xi’s views on bilateral relations. Both sides are comprehensively implementing the important consensus reached in Busan. China made significant contributions to the victory in World War II, and the U.S. side understands the importance of the Taiwan issue to China.
The two leaders also discussed the Ukraine crisis. Xi Jinping emphasized that China supports all efforts conducive to peace, hopes all parties will continue narrowing differences, and will reach a fair, lasting, and binding peace agreement as soon as possible to resolve the crisis at its root.
Video: US Stunned: 90% of the increase in global oil stocks has been absorbed by China’s strategic and commercial reserves in 2025! What’s Happening? 美方震驚: 2025年全球石油庫存增量的90%竟被中國戰略與商業儲備吸收! 背後暗藏何種玄機?
In 2025, one country took 90% of the world’s new oil reserves—China.
While the economy cools down and 10 million new EVs hit the roads, China is stockpiling 1.2-1.4 million barrels per day. With a 180-day oil reserve far exceeding international safety standards, the US has gone silent.
What’s really going on?
This video provides in-depth analysis on: ✅ Why China is stockpiling oil despite economic slowdown ✅ What the 90% figure really means ✅ What scale of crisis a 180-day reserve can handle ✅ Energy warfare in US-China competition ✅ Impact of Taiwan Strait tensions and Japan’s right-wing shift
This isn’t just about energy—it’s strategic positioning in great power competition.
📌 Why do you think China is stockpiling this much oil? Share your thoughts in the comments!
India has become a laughingstock again! Spending $1 billion on eight tunnel boring machines from China, with the original intention of dismantling them to learn the technology…印度又鬧笑話！花了10億美元買了中國8台盾構機，原本打算拆開學習技術…
But after taking them apart, they couldn’t reassemble them and had to turn to China for help! According to the contract, China Railway was supposed to send engineers to India for assembly and debugging, but India, using “security” as an excuse, barred the Chinese engineers from the site. They were determined to dismantle the machines themselves, hoping to master the technology through imitation and eventually produce their own replicas.
However, the Indians were dumbfounded upon disassembly: inside were密密麻麻 over 8,000 sensors, 2,000 special blades, and tens of thousands of precision components scattered all over the floor. Three months later, they still hadn’t figured out where the main bearing should go.
Piyush Goyal, the official in charge of India’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry, initially blamed the poor quality of Chinese components. But after British experts inspected them, every single part was confirmed to be up to standard, leaving India publicly embarrassed. This incident also made it clear to everyone the gap between Chinese and Indian industrial capabilities—it’s not that China did anything underhanded, but rather that India’s current industrial base simply can’t handle such high-end equipment. India’s attempt to cut corners this time was utterly absurd; they didn’t even understand what level of equipment a tunnel boring machine is before daring to dismantle it.
Each of these machines weighs thousands of tons and integrates over a hundred systems, including mechanical, hydraulic, electrical control, and software systems, functioning like a “mobile underground factory.” A single 12-meter-diameter tunnel boring machine includes five core systems, such as the main drive, cutterhead cutting, and segment assembly, each requiring fine-tuning of thousands of parameters. The precision of the main bearing must reach 0.01 millimeters, finer than a human hair, while the leakage rate of hydraulic components must be less than one in ten billion—a level of precision even many Western countries struggle to achieve.
Indian engineers, armed with Chinese manuals, couldn’t even identify all the special blades on the cutterhead. These blades are made of specialty steel with extreme hardness and wear resistance 50 times that of ordinary steel. India’s best steel producer, Tata Steel, can’t even figure out the formula for this steel, let alone understand how to install the blades to adapt to different soil conditions. Ridiculously, after failing to reassemble the first machine, they thought they hadn’t disassembled it carefully enough and proceeded to dismantle a second one for comparison. In the process, they misconnected hydraulic pipelines, burned out sensors, and caused $300 million in damages from broken parts alone, rendering both machines useless.
India’s actions were driven by the frenzy of the “Make in India” slogan and an unwillingness to admit that Chinese technology is superior. For years, India has been importing tunnel boring machines from Europe for projects like the Mumbai Coastal Road Tunnel and the Bangalore Metro. German manufacturer Herrenknecht charges $180 million per machine, offers poor after-sales service, and takes three months for repairs, making the costs prohibitively high. Eventually, India had no choice but to turn to China.
China Railway’s tunnel boring machines are not only 30% cheaper but also offer customized solutions based on geological conditions, with an after-sales network covering 33 countries and remote diagnostics available at any time. However, India felt embarrassed about buying Chinese equipment and always wanted to “use your products while stealing your technology.” During the Mumbai Metro Line 3 project, India had already tried to get Chinese engineers to “incidentally teach the technology,” but were refused. This time, they aimed to go straight to imitation under the guise of “independent assembly,” even planning to relabel the machines as “Made in India.” Yet, they couldn’t even manage the most basic assembly.
What India didn’t realize is that the control software of Chinese tunnel boring machines contains tens of thousands of lines of code, including geological adaptation algorithms and tunneling parameter optimizations, which can’t be deciphered through disassembly. Moreover, the system has anti-tampering protection: if unauthorized disassembly is detected, the main program automatically erases data. The lubricating grease for key bearings also requires original factory maintenance, or it becomes ineffective within a day. India’s attempt to learn technology through brute-force disassembly was pure fantasy.
Even more embarrassingly, when Chinese engineers arrived, it took them just five days to assemble and debug all eight machines, ready to start work immediately. What Indian engineers couldn’t accomplish in three months, Chinese experts achieved in days. It’s not that Chinese engineers are miraculous, but rather that they are backed by a complete technological system. Recall the 1990s, when China needed tunnel boring machines for the Xi’an-Ankang Railway, German company Wirth charged 760 million yuan per machine and imposed harsh conditions, even barring Chinese participation in maintenance. Starting in 2002, China invested two decades and hundreds of billions of yuan to achieve breakthroughs across the entire supply chain, from components to complete machines. In 2020, China Railway Equipment launched its 1,000th tunnel boring machine, now holding 70% of the global market share. Even German company Herrenknecht imports components from China.
Behind this lies breakthroughs in Chinese materials: the special steel for the cutterhead was independently developed by Baosteel, capable of withstanding rock impacts. It also reflects advancements in precision manufacturing: the main bearing’s accuracy reaches 0.005 millimeters, ten times higher than India’s machining level. System integration is equally critical—China seamlessly combines mechanical, electronic, and software systems to enable the machines to automatically adjust tunneling speeds based on different geological conditions. India only sees China’s current achievements but ignores the decades of step-by-step problem-solving. Thinking they can imitate technology by disassembling a few machines is utterly naive.
Even more ironically, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad high-speed rail project in India has been halted because China refused to export two tunnel boring machines. China’s Ministry of Commerce explicitly stated that it has the right to review exports for projects in sensitive regions. Now, India is in a panic: without Chinese tunnel boring machines, their infrastructure plans remain on paper, as European and American equipment is both expensive and inefficient, and they lack the capability to produce their own.
👉 In the end, India’s embarrassment stems from “ambition exceeding capability.” Trying to steal technology through petty cleverness, they failed to realize that high-end manufacturing isn’t achieved through disassembly but through decades of R&D and industrial chain accumulation.
👉 Chinese tunnel boring machines went from being monopolized by foreign countries to leading the world through “decades of relentless effort.” India’s attempt to take shortcuts by “dismantling machines” only led to humiliation. Now, India has come to terms with reality: not only have they invited Chinese engineers for long-term on-site assistance, but they’ve also placed additional orders for four more tunnel boring machines. The question is, will they dare to entertain thoughts of “stealing technology” again? Technological barriers can’t be broken by disassembly alone; only steadfast R&D and addressing shortcomings will pave the right path. Resorting to petty cleverness will inevitably lead to setbacks.
American logistic expert report from China: The German government wants to decouple from China. But German companies can’t afford to leave. The economic future is not in US and EU! 影片有中文字幕: 美國物流專家在中國報導, 德國政府意欲與中國脫鉤，然德國企業卻無法承受撤離之重。世界經濟的未來不在美國與歐盟!
Major German companies are accelerating their capital investments and expansions in China.
German policymakers insist that firms instead invest in Europe, where manufacturing industries are being hollowed out by high energy and labor costs, regulation, and collapsing consumer demand.
But German firms cannot afford to leave China. The depth of Chinese supply chains would take years to replace, and at far higher costs.
What’s more, Asia is where almost all the consumer market growth is, with double-digit booms in consumer class populations with disposable incomes.
What is the 28-point peace plan proposed by the U.S. for Ukraine? 美國向烏克蘭提出的 28 點和平計畫是什麼? By Johnson Choi, Nov 24 2025
The U.S. “28-point” peace plan is a draft proposal that came to light in November 2025, aimed at ending (or at least de-escalating) the Russia-Ukraine war. This proposal is quite controversial, as many of its terms are close to Russian demands, with some even seen as requiring very painful concessions from Ukraine. Below are the key contents, criticisms, and reactions.
Main Contents of the 28-Point Plan (Compiled from various media reports):
Reaffirmation of Ukrainian Sovereignty – The plan formally affirms Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Comprehensive Non-Aggression Pact – A non-aggression pact to be signed by Russia, Ukraine, and Europe to address long-standing security ambiguities.
No Further NATO Expansion (Including No Admission of Ukraine) – The plan stipulates that NATO will not admit Ukraine in the future.
NATO-Russia Dialogue – Establishment of a security dialogue mechanism between NATO and Russia, mediated by the U.S., to reduce tensions.
Security Guarantees for Ukraine – But with multiple conditions attached.
Limitation of Ukrainian Military Size – The Ukrainian military would be capped at 600,000 personnel.
Ukrainian Constitution to Renounce NATO Membership – Ukraine must constitutionally enshrine never joining NATO, and NATO must formally commit not to admit Ukraine.
No Deployment of NATO Troops on Ukrainian Territory.
European Fighter Jets Can Be Deployed in Poland, but Not in Ukraine.
U.S. Security Commitment – The U.S. promises a “decisive, coordinated military response” and reinstatement of sanctions if Russia invades again, but guarantees can be revoked if Ukraine initiates an attack against Russia.
Ukraine Must Hold National Elections Within 100 Days.
Reconstruction Funding Source – Use frozen Russian assets (approximately $100 billion) for Ukraine’s reconstruction.
Distribution of Reconstruction Profits – The U.S. would receive 50% of the profits from reconstruction projects.
Establishment of a U.S.-Russia Joint Investment Fund – Using remaining frozen Russian assets.
Russia’s Reinstatement to the G8 – The plan allows for Russia’s gradual reintegration into major economic organizations.
Creation of a Neutral Buffer Zone – For example, designating parts of the Donetsk region still under Ukrainian control as demilitarized zones.
Constitutional and Governance Reforms – Including anti-corruption reforms and other conditions in exchange for closer EU trade and economic integration.
Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant Under IAEA Supervision, with electricity output shared 50/50 between Russia and Ukraine.
Amnesty for Wartime Actions – Amnesty for actions during the war by all parties (highly controversial).
Exchange and Release of Detainees – Including the return of civilians and children.
Long-term Arms and Nuclear Weapons Restrictions Agreement – Continuation of U.S.-Russia arms control agreements; Ukraine remains non-nuclear.
Guarantee of Ukrainian Commercial Shipping Rights on the Dnieper River – Russia is prohibited from obstructing it.
Cultural and Educational Programs – Promotion of cross-cultural education programs to “eliminate ethnic prejudice.”
U.S.-Russia Economic Cooperation – Including cooperation in AI, mining, and infrastructure.
Russia’s Reintegration into the Global Economy – Gradual lifting of sanctions.
Establishment of a “Peace Commission” – To oversee the implementation of the agreement.
Permanent Neutrality for Ukraine – Formally established in the constitution (echoing the NATO clause).
Comprehensive Security Dialogue Framework – Covering NATO, Russia, and the U.S. to prevent future conflicts.
Main Criticisms and Risks:
· Risk of Territorial Concessions: Many believe this plan forces Ukraine to accept the current territorial status quo under Russian occupation (Crimea, parts of Donbas). · Renunciation of NATO Aspirations: Ukraine is forced to permanently abandon NATO membership, seen as a major long-term security loss. · Military Cap Limit Weakens Defense Capability: A 600,000 troop cap might be insufficient for long-term defense against Russia. · Ambiguity in U.S. Security承诺: The conditional nature of the承诺 and lack of a clear enforcement mechanism. · U.S. Taking 50% of Reconstruction Profits Sparks Criticism: Criticized as “profit-oriented peace.” · Amnesty for War Crimes Highly Controversial: Could hinder accountability for war crimes. · Europe Questions the Plan’s Pro-Russia Bias: Several European leaders stated the plan requires “significant modifications.” · Risk of Russia’s Rapid Reintegration into the International System: Could weaken deterrence against future Russian aggression.
Current Status and Reactions:
· Russia: The Kremlin stated it has not yet engaged in in-depth discussions with the U.S.; · Ukraine: Zelenskyy expressed willingness to “discuss” but has not yet endorsed it; · EU / G7: View this plan as a “basis” but require “major adjustments” before acceptance.
⸻
Why is it so controversial?
· It demands numerous concessions from Ukraine, while Russia’s concessions are fewer. · The issues of NATO and sovereignty touch upon Ukraine’s most core national interests. · It lacks a reliable security guarantee mechanism. · It involves amnesty for Russian war crimes and its rapid return to the international stage.
Business Blog 