SCMP: The Kirin 9030, the processor behind Huawei’s Mate 80 Pro Max, was manufactured by China’s top foundry Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC) using the N+3 process, which is a “scaled evolution” of the chipmaker’s previous 7-nm node technology, according to Canadian semiconductor research firm TechInsights. 據加拿大半導體研究機構TechInsights分析，華為Mate 80 Pro Max搭載的麒麟9030處理器，由中國頂級晶圓代工廠中芯國際採用N+3製程生產。該製程實為中芯國際原有7奈米節點技術的「工藝尺寸進化版」。
Video: Hong Kong has Jimmy Lai; China and the United States also have tens of thousands of “Jimmy Lais”! In reality, China and the U.S. have already begun fighting! More terrifying than external enemies are the “insiders” who hand the knife to the enemy. 香港有黎智英，中國和美國也有成千上萬的黎智英！這些人為了錢或幫助外國勢力要摧毀中華民族! 中美其实早就开打了！比外部强敌更可怕的，是“内鬼”在递刀子!
https://rumble.com/v731ww2-hk-has-jimmy-lai-china-and-the-us-also-have-tens-of-thousands-of-jimmy-lais.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8yR9uUd/
Recently, as the international situation has shifted, discussions about aircraft carriers and “Dongfeng Express” missiles have grown increasingly heated. But amid the surge of emotion, have we overlooked deeper, underlying concerns?
In this episode, we start from the recently attention-grabbing “Liu Weidong case” to take an in-depth look at the core issues of defense industry and supply-chain security.
Why do we say that “a fortress is easiest to breach from within”?
More than a hundred years ago, why did the Beiyang Fleet—boasting Asia’s strongest paper strength—still suffer a crushing defeat?
In today’s world of ubiquitous connectivity, what warning does the Lebanon pager incident sound for us?
We won’t talk about empty slogans—only about hard, bloody lessons.
From the protection of rare-earth resources to anti-corruption in critical sectors, this is not merely an economic calculation, but a survival contest that concerns the fate of the nation.
History is often astonishingly similar. We look back at history so as not to repeat it.
Seeing through appearances to grasp the essence, let us maintain clarity and calm reflection amid the clamor of the public discourse.
香港有黎智英，中國和美國也有成千上萬的黎智英！中美其实早就开打了！比外部强敌更可怕的，是“内鬼”在递刀子!
近期，随着国际局势的变化，关于航母、东风快递的讨论甚嚣尘上。然而，在情绪高涨之余，我们是否忽略了更深层次的隐忧？
本期视频，我们将从近期引发关注的“刘卫东案件”切入，深入探讨国防工业与供应链安全的核心议题。
为什么说“堡垒最容易从内部攻破”？
一百多年前的北洋水师，为何坐拥亚洲第一的纸面数据却吞下败果？
在万物互联的今天，黎巴嫩寻呼机事件给我们敲响了什么警钟？
我们不谈空洞的口号，只谈血淋淋的教训。
从稀土资源的保护，到关键领域的反腐，这不仅仅是一场经济账，更是一场关乎国运的生存博弈。
历史总是惊人的相似，但我们回顾历史，是为了不再重蹈覆辙。
透过现象看本质，让我们一起在喧嚣的舆论场中，保持一份清醒与冷思考。
U.S. arms maker Lockheed Martin never imagined that failing to pay China’s 99-billion-yuan fine would lead to such severe consequences…美軍火商洛馬怎也沒想到，沒繳中方990億罰單，後果竟然如此嚴重…
When the company first stared at that 99-billion-yuan penalty, it was most likely with a kind of American-style arrogance and certainty, assuming it was just another “symbolic gesture” from an Eastern power.
But this 99-billion-yuan fine was never an empty threat. It was imposed in mid-2023 under China’s Anti–Foreign Sanctions Law, triggered by Lockheed Martin’s repeated crossing of red lines through arms sales to Taiwan. The amount was set at exactly twice the value of those arms deals, with a solid legal basis.
At the time, The Wall Street Journal even mocked China for “lacking real enforcement tools.” Those words have since come back to haunt them. Lockheed Martin initially didn’t take it seriously at all, openly stating in its financial reports that China-related business accounted for less than 1% of revenue and could be cut off without concern.
But China played a precise combination of measures. First, it sealed off the civilian market: cooperative air traffic control systems and nuclear power projects were halted, senior executives were banned from entering the country, and import–export business was driven straight to zero.
The real killer move lay hidden in the supply chain. Lockheed Martin’s flagship F-35 fighter requires 417 kilograms of rare earths per aircraft. Eighty-seven percent of U.S. main combat equipment depends on China’s rare earth processing capacity, and 97% of global heavy rare earth refining is firmly in China’s hands. This is Lockheed Martin’s true Achilles’ heel.
When China subsequently tightened export controls on rare earths, gallium, and germanium, Lockheed Martin scrambled to find alternative suppliers. Australian rare earths exceeded impurity limits; radars built with them saw failure rates surge by 300%. After switching stealth coatings, infrared signatures expanded by 4.7 times, turning fifth-generation fighters into live targets on radar screens.
Production capacity was cut in half. F-35 delivery cycles ballooned from 61 days to 238 days, upgrade schedules were delayed by more than two years, and breach-of-contract penalties alone reached US$800 million. Inspections of delivered aircraft uncovered 873 technical defects, with 45% of the fleet grounded and unable to carry out missions.
Customers voted with their feet. Canada slashed its planned purchase from 88 aircraft to 16; Spain froze its order; Portugal canceled cooperation outright. No one wanted to pay a premium for a pile of failure-prone “high-tech junk.” Lockheed Martin’s share price plunged 25% over the year, and net profit margin fell from 10% to 4.7%.
Even harsher was China’s “ecosystem expulsion order”: any company deeply cooperating with Lockheed Martin was barred from the Chinese market. Even Airbus and Safran were forced to cut ties at great pain. Lockheed Martin was completely isolated from the world’s largest market.
Lockheed Martin scoured the globe for rare-earth alternatives, but U.S. domestic processing capacity is virtually nonexistent. Even if ores are found, there is no ability to refine them. At one point, a Utah Air Force base reportedly had to dismantle magnets from decommissioned warships to extract rare earths—an absurd scene born of desperation.
👉 The ill-gotten gains from arms sales to Taiwan were minimal, yet Lockheed Martin lost its supply-chain lifeline and future markets. Its predicament is no longer about whether to pay a fine, but about the fatal price of arrogance. China’s countermeasures are not threats—they are a firm stance that sovereignty red lines are not to be crossed.
👉 It’s time for hegemonic thinking to wake up. Any company that dares to trample on China’s core interests must be prepared to bear the consequences—no exceptions. China’s sanctions have always been proportional to the level of provocation. This is both the bottom line and the source of confidence.
美軍火商洛馬怎也沒想到，沒繳中方990億罰單，後果竟然如此嚴重…
這家公司當初盯着那張990億人民幣罰單時，大概率是帶着美式傲慢的篤定，覺得這不過是東方大國又一次“象徵性表態”。
這張990億人民幣罰單從不是空架子，2023年中方依據反外國制裁法開出，源頭就是洛馬屢次突破紅線參與對台軍售，罰款金額正好是其軍售總額的兩倍，法理依據鑿鑿。
《華爾街日報》當初還嘲諷中方“缺乏實質手段”，如今全成了打臉的話。洛馬起初壓根沒當回事，財報里直言中國業務佔比不足1%，覺得斷了也無妨。
可中方玩的是精準組合拳，先封死民用市場，合作的空管系統、核電項目全被叫停，高管被禁入境，進出口業務直接歸零。
真正的殺招藏在供應鏈里，洛馬的王牌F-35戰機每架要耗417公斤稀土，美國87%的主戰裝備都依賴中國稀土加工能力，全球97%的重稀土提純產能更是攥在中方手裡，這才是洛馬的命門。
中方後續收緊稀土、鎵、鍺出口管制，洛馬急着找替代貨源，澳大利亞的稀土雜質超標，用它造的雷達故障率飆升300%，隱身塗料換了之後紅外信號擴大4.7倍，五代機成了雷達上的活靶子。
產能直接被腰斬，F-35交付周期從61天暴增至238天，升級周期延誤兩年多，光違約金就賠了8億美元。已交付的戰機查出873個技術缺陷，45%的戰機趴在停機坪上沒法執行任務。
客戶們集體用腳投票，加拿大把88架採購計劃砍到16架，西班牙凍結訂單，葡萄牙直接取消合作，沒人願意花天價買一堆故障頻發的“精密垃圾”。洛馬股價年內重挫25%，凈利潤率從10%跌到4.7%。
更狠的是中方的生態驅逐令，任何和洛馬深度合作的企業都被禁入中國市場，連空客、賽峰都只能忍痛切割，洛馬徹底被孤立在全球最大市場之外。
洛馬滿世界找稀土備胎，可美國本土加工能力近乎為零，就算找到礦也沒法提純，猶他州空軍基地竟要拆退役軍艦磁體提稀土，荒誕背後全是絕望。
👉對台軍售的不義之財沒賺多少，卻丟了供應鏈命脈和未來市場，洛馬的困境早不是繳不繳罰單的事，而是為傲慢付出的致命代價。中方的反制從不是威脅，是主權紅線不容觸碰的堅定態度。
👉霸權思維早該醒醒，任何企業敢踩中國核心利益的紅線，都要做好承擔後果的準備，沒有例外。中方的制裁力度，從來都和挑釁程度成正比，這是底線也是底氣。
A Shift Witnessed: The Changing Global Landscape. By Johnson Choi, Dec 14 2025
親眼見證的轉變：全球格局的變遷 作者：蔡永強| 2025年12月14日
Recent conversations with dozens of friends, relatives, and clients who traveled to China in the past year have led to a strikingly consistent conclusion: we are witnessing the rapid rise of the East and the relative decline of the West, unfolding right before our eyes.
This sentiment resonates deeply with my own memories. I still recall 1985, when I traveled with a Honolulu delegation to Hainan to sign a Sister City Agreement. Sanya was essentially a virgin beach, untouched by major development. Our journey from Guangzhou, where we stayed at the iconic White Swan Hotel—then China’s only five-star hotel, developed by the Hong Kong patriot Mr. Henry Fok—felt like stepping back in time. Hainan and Guangzhou in the mid-80s reminded me of the Hong Kong countryside in the 1950s.
The transformation since has been nothing short of breathtaking. One of the most common reflections from those returning to the United States—particularly from places like San Francisco and Hawaii—speaks volumes:
“We left an advanced economy: safe, clean, with modern transportation, impressive infrastructure, and superior food and services. The moment we landed back in the U.S., we felt we needed time to readjust to what now, by comparison, feels like a developing country.”
This visceral reaction highlights a profound shift in everyday reality and global perception.
What has been your personal experience? Do these observations align with what you’ve seen or felt?
近來與數十位過去一年曾到訪中國的朋友、親人和客戶交談，得出了一個驚人一致的結論：我們正親眼目睹東方的迅速崛起與西方的相對衰落。
這種感受與我個人的記憶深深共鳴。我依然清楚記得1985年，我隨檀香山代表團前往海南簽署姊妹城市協議的情景。那時的三亞基本上是一片未經開發的處女海灘。我們從廣州出發，入住地標性的白天鵝酒店——當時中國唯一的五星級酒店，由愛國港商霍英東先生興建——整段旅程彷彿踏入了時光隧道。80年代中期的海南與廣州，讓我想起50年代的香港鄉郊。
自此之後的轉變，只能用「翻天覆地」來形容。從美國——特別是舊金山、夏威夷等地——前往中國公幹或旅遊後返美的人士，最常發出的感慨尤其值得深思：
「我們離開的是一個先進的經濟體：安全、潔淨，擁有現代化的交通、令人印象深刻的基礎建設，以及卓越的飲食與服務。但當我們一降落美國，便感到需要時間重新適應——因為相較之下，這裡現在彷彿像是一個發展中國家。」
這種直觀的反應，凸顯了日常生活現實與全球觀感的深刻轉變。
您的個人經驗又是如何？這些觀察是否與您的所見所感相符？
Shigeru Ishiba is remarkably clear-headed – former prime ministers really are a different breed…石破茂倒是挺清醒的，當過首相的人還是不一樣…
On December 9, his question, “Can Japan’s economy survive without China?” left reporters speechless on the spot. The next day, Japanese media clipped it into a short video that rocketed to the top of Yahoo’s trending list with over 10 million views.
On camera, he counted on his fingers: food self-sufficiency is only 38%, energy self-sufficiency 12%, over half of 1,406 product categories rely on China, and almost 100% of the dysprosium and terbium used in EV magnets from rare earths are shipped from Chinese ports. He then delivered the finishing blow: “How is this any different from starting a war with the US, which was a hundred times our size back then?” With one sentence, he punctured the “economic encirclement” narrative touted by the Hayashi Sanae administration like a leaky balloon.
Why does Ishiba dare to “boost others’ morale” like this? The backstory is more dramatic than a TV drama. In October this year, Hayashi quietly pushed a “de-China supply chain” agenda at the “Five Central Asian Nations Summit.” Before her chartered flight back even landed, Japanese automakers panicked – Toyota and Honda’s procurement departments immediately emailed the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI): their magnetic steel stockpiles would only last 45 days. If China restricted supply, their hybrid production lines would have to shut down.
METI secretly calculated that a three-month rare earth supply cut would directly slash GDP by 0.11%, equivalent to the entire nation working for nothing over a Golden Week holiday. Even more awkwardly, the $25 billion worth of Australian light rare earths Japan stockpiled must first be shipped to China for refining before being loaded back onto ships bound for Yokohama – a full circle that still can’t bypass Chinese technology. Ishiba saw this internal report during the party leadership election and understands perfectly: slogans are loud, but wallets are honest. So he simply dragged the “emperor’s new clothes” in front of the camera for a live broadcast.
What’s the next act? The Hayashi government talks tough while secretly hitting the brakes. On December 10, METI added a $2.1 billion subsidy for domestic semiconductors but wrote “cooperation with China” into the bidding terms, prompting Japanese media to mock them for their “honest actions.” The Foreign Ministry’s originally planned joint statement on a “Taiwan Strait contingency” was hastily changed to a “call for dialogue,” with the meeting duration shrinking from three days to one hour.
Banking circles whisper that the Bank of Japan has quietly prepared 500 billion yen in emergency credit, fearing automakers might not even be able to pay salaries if China truly plays the “rare earth card.” Predictions abound that if Hayashi continues fanning the flames, the LDP’s “Kishida faction” will join forces with “economic pragmatists” during next year’s budget deliberations to force her hand, making her backtrack before the spring party conference—otherwise, the budget votes will be in jeopardy.
In my view, Ishiba isn’t pro-China; he’s just slamming the “national ledger” on the table: Japan has 120 million people who need to eat every day, need fuel to get around, and factories need rare earths to operate. All three of these lifelines are tied to the cranes in Chinese ports. If Hayashi Sanae wants to play “values-based diplomacy,” she first needs to ask if the hundreds-of-meters-long magnetic steel production lines in Toyota’s factories will agree.
Times have changed. A few Aegis destroyers can’t keep supermarket shelves stocked or voters’ rice bowls full. Treating economic lifelines as electoral props will only result in being forced to admit fault by one’s own business conglomerates. Ishiba’s “clarity” is essentially a plain truth: when a smaller nation gambles against a larger one, it should first weigh how much rice it has in its own pocket.
石破茂倒是挺清醒的，當過首相的人還是不一樣…
12月9日，他一句“日本經濟離開中國還能活嗎”把記者噎得當場卡殼，隔天就被日媒剪成短視頻衝上雅虎熱榜，點擊量破千萬。
鏡頭裡他掰着指頭數：糧食自給才38%，能源自給12%，1406類商品一半以上靠中國，稀土裡做電動車磁鐵的鏑和鋱幾乎100%從中國港口拉貨。說完補刀，“這跟當年找百倍體量的美國開戰有啥區別？”一句話把高市早苗政府吹的“經濟包圍圈”戳成漏氣氣球。
為啥石破敢這麼“長他人志氣”？幕後故事比劇還精彩。今年10月，高市在“中亞五國峰會”上暗推“去中國供應鏈”，結果回國的包機還沒落地，日本車企先慌了——豐田、本田的採購部連夜給經產省發郵件：磁鋼庫存只夠45天，一旦中國限供，混動產線就得放假。
經產省偷偷一算，若稀土斷供三個月，GDP直接掉0.11%，等於全國白乾一個黃金周。更尷尬的是，日本砸250億美元囤的澳洲輕稀土，得先運到中國精鍊，再裝船回橫濱，繞一圈還是繞不過中國技術。石破在總裁選舉時看過這份內參，心裡門兒清：口號喊得響，錢包最誠實，於是乾脆把“皇帝的新衣”拉到鏡頭前直播。
接下來劇情怎麼演？高市政府一邊嘴硬，一邊偷偷踩剎車。12月10日，經產省追加21億美元補貼本土半導體，卻把“對華合作”寫進招標條款，被日媒吐槽“身體很誠實”；外務省原定的“台海有事”聯合聲明臨時改成“呼籲對話”，時間從三天縮水成一小時。
銀行圈傳，日本央行已悄悄備好5000億日元應急信貸，怕中國真打“稀土牌”時車企連工資都發不出。坊間預測，高市若繼續拱火，自民黨“岸田派”將在明年預算會聯手“經濟派”逼宮，讓她在春季黨大會前改口，否則預算票就黃了。
在我看來，石破不是親華，只是把“國家賬本”摔在桌面上：日本1.2億人口，每天張嘴就要吃，抬腳就要油，工廠轉一圈就得用稀土，這三樣命門全拴在中國港口的起重機上。高市早苗想玩“價值觀外交”，先得問問豐田工廠里那幾百米長的磁鋼生產線答不答應。
時代變了，靠幾艘宙斯盾艦撐不起超市貨架，也撐不起選民飯碗；把經濟命脈當選舉道具，最後只能被自家財團按頭認錯。石破的“清醒”其實就是一句大白話：小國賭大國，先掂掂自己口袋裡有幾顆米。
Stroke Prevention & Early Detection Guide (translated from the video not meant to be medical advice) 中風預防與早期識別指南 (影片內容翻譯，非專業醫療建議)
Stroke is a medical emergency. The legs often provide the first warning signs. Recognizing them can save a life.
Part 1: Early Leg Warning Signs (Pre-Stroke Symptoms)
These may appear briefly and then fade, but they are critical red flags:
· Sudden loss of strength or numbness in one leg.
· A leg that feels heavy, dull, or “not your own.”
· Feeling like you are dragging a leg, or your slipper keeps falling off.
· Unexplained loss of balance or falling on level ground.
· Involuntary shaking, jumping, or cramping in a leg while at rest.
· Walking erratically, like being drunk, without having consumed alcohol.
· Crucially: Any of these symptoms that come and go.
Part 2: Daily Self-Checks for Leg Health
Perform these simple tests each morning:
Part 3: Dietary Recommendations for Prevention
Eat More:
· Leafy Greens: Daily spinach or kale.
· Deep-Water Fish: Salmon, mackerel, sardines (rich in Omega-3s).
· Tomatoes & Berries: High in antioxidants.
Limit or Avoid:
· High-sodium (salty) foods.
Part 4: The FAST Test – Act Immediately!
If you suspect someone is having a stroke, think F.A.S.T. and act faster:
F – FACE: Ask the person to smile. Does one side of the face droop?
A – ARMS: Ask them to raise both arms. Does one arm drift downward?
S – SPEECH: Ask them to repeat a simple sentence. Is their speech slurred or strange?
T – TIME: If you see ANY of these signs, call the ambulance immediately. Note the time when symptoms first appeared.
⚠️ Time is Brain: There is a critical “golden window” (often 3-4 hours) for the most effective emergency treatment. Do not wait to see if symptoms improve.
中風預防與早期識別指南 (影片內容翻譯，非專業醫療建議)
中風是醫療急症。腿部常常提供最初的預警信號。識別這些信號可以挽救生命。
第一部分：腿部早期預警信號 (中風前兆症狀)
這些症狀可能短暫出現後消失，但卻是關鍵的危險信號：
· 單腿突然無力或麻木。
· 腿部感覺沉重、遲鈍或「不像是自己的」。
· 感覺像是拖著一條腿走路，或拖鞋一直掉落。
· 無故失去平衡或在平地摔倒。
· 休息時腿部不自主地顫抖、跳動或抽筋。
· 走路不穩，像醉酒一樣，但並未飲酒。
· 關鍵在於： 任何反覆出現又消失的上述症狀。
第二部分：每日腿部健康自我檢查
每天早晨進行這些簡單測試：
第三部分：預防飲食建議
多攝取：
· 綠葉蔬菜： 每日食用菠菜或羽衣甘藍。
· 深海魚類： 鮭魚、鯖魚、沙丁魚（富含Omega-3脂肪酸）。
· 番茄與莓果： 富含抗氧化劑。
限制或避免：
· 高鈉（過鹹）食物。
第四部分：FAST口訣測試 — 立即行動！
若懷疑有人中風，請記住 「FAST」口訣並迅速行動：
F – 臉部 (Face)： 請對方微笑。臉部是否有一側下垂？
A – 手臂 (Arms)： 請對方舉起雙臂。是否有一隻手臂無力下垂？
S – 說話 (Speech)： 請對方重複一句簡單的話。說話是否含糊不清或語無倫次？
T – 時間 (Time)： 若出現以上任一症狀，請立即呼叫救護車。記下症狀首次出現的時間。
⚠️ 時間就是大腦： 存在一個關鍵的「黃金治療窗」（通常為3-4小時），在此期間進行緊急治療最為有效。切勿等待觀察症狀是否改善。
I am in the Hawaiian Airlines plane now. They are serving junk foods, therefore watching YouTube to find good place to eat while in HK and China following weeks. We have been staying here for more than 30 years each time we are in HK until recently. The food looks surprisingly good for our Christmas dinner this year for HK$500 each with all kinds of ALL YOU CAN EAT for 3 hours, fresh seafoods like lobster, crab, fish, abalone and much more..same Christmas Menu will cost at least 3x more + 30% tax and tips in San Francisco or Hawaii AND THE SEAFOODS NOT GOING TO BE AS GOOD OR AS FRESH 我現在正在夏威夷航空的飛機上。飛機上供應的是一些垃圾食品，所以我正在看YouTube，想找找接下來幾週在香港和中國大陸有哪些好吃的餐廳。直到最近，我們每次來香港都會住在這裡，已經住了三十多年了。今年我們預訂的聖誕晚餐看起來出乎意料地棒，每人只需500港幣，就可以享受3小時的自助餐，各種美食應有盡有，包括新鮮的海鮮，比如龍蝦、螃蟹、魚、鮑魚等等……同樣的聖誕菜單，在舊金山或夏威夷至少要貴三倍，還要加上30%的稅和小費，而且海鮮肯定沒有這裡的新鮮美味 https://youtu.be/FXDsoBTtz8E?si=huTOxX97D2zXwdYt 👍👏
SCMP: The Chinese humanoid robots will follow voice commands to perform any task – like fetching water or tidying a table – potentially as soon as next year. 《南華早報》報導：這些人形機器人將能夠聽從語音指令執行任何任務，例如取水或整理桌子，最快可能在明年就能實現.
US throwing money at AI and Robotics projects by the billions monthly with no practical application is part of the Ponzi Scheme doomed to fail! 美國每月投入數十億美元用於人工智慧和機器人項目，卻沒有任何實際應用，這不過是注定要失敗的龐氏騙局!
SCMP: The odds seemed impossible: a shoestring Chinese start-up founded in 2023 with just 1 million yuan (US$142,000) taking on Elon Musk – tech legend, disrupter in space and CEO of Tesla – who is valued at half a trillion dollars.
In less than two years, EngineAI Robotics, led by CEO Zhao Tongyang, created the T800 – a robot that delivers Bruce Lee-style roundhouse kicks with the force of a small car – and, under the instruction of smiling engineers and scientists, tried it first on the boss himself.
The scepticism deepened when, during a live demo, Elon Musk’s Optimus fell backwards while trying to hand over a water bottle.
《南華早報》報道：這看起來幾乎是不可能完成的任務：一家成立於2023年、資金僅有100萬元人民幣（14.2萬美元）的中國初創公司，竟然要挑戰埃隆·馬斯克——這位科技傳奇人物、太空領域的顛覆者以及特斯拉的首席執行官，其身家高達五千億美元。
不到兩年時間，由執行長趙同陽領導的EngineAI Robotics公司就研發出了T800機器人——這款機器人能夠踢出李小龍式的迴旋踢，力量堪比一輛小型汽車——在笑容滿面的工程師和科學家的指導下，他們首先在老闆身上進行了測試。
然而，在一次現場演示中，埃隆馬斯克的Optimus機器人在試圖遞水瓶時向後摔倒，這加深了人們的懷疑。
SCMP: China has launched a revolutionary facility in the eastern province of Shandong that produces fresh water from seawater for just two yuan (US$0.28) per cubic metre, generating green hydrogen as a by-product in a breakthrough that could redefine global water and energy systems. 《南華早報》報告稱，中國在東部山東省建成了一座具有革命性的海水淡化設施，每立方米海水淡化的成本僅為兩元人民幣（0.28美元），同時也能產生綠色氫氣作為副產品。這項突破性技術有望重塑全球水資源和能源系統.
Business Blog 