6,000+ followers on TitTok, people love my postings everyday! You are welcome to be part of my TitTok community. TikTok 上有 6,000 多名關注者，人們每天都喜歡我的帖子！ 歡迎您成為我的 TikTok 社區的一部分.

Taiwan National University Professor Video: how does the name Huawei comes from? 台灣台大教授視頻: 華為的名字怎樣來的? 中(華)有(為), 你懂嗎? 大部分中國人都懂, 美國的大堆廢話什麼打擊iPhone等想像力過度豐富了.
https://rumble.com/v3i5ovc-how-does-the-name-huawei-comes-from.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8jxWKLA/

Video: A nations of thieves and criminals, honestly who has the right minds want to raise their children in America? In California you can rob anyone up to US$950 and police can’t even touch you 一個充斥著小偷和罪犯的國家，說實話，誰有頭腦正常，願意在美國把孩子帶大呢? 在加利福尼亞州，你可以搶劫任何人商店最多 950 美元，而警察甚至無法碰你.
https://rumble.com/v3i4s3u-a-nations-of-thieves-and-criminals.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8jxxhBH/

Video: Contrary to Native Americans, Hawaiian said we are not proud Americans, US stolen our land and forced us to become Americans 視頻：與美洲原住民相反, 夏威夷人說我們不是驕傲的美國人，美國偷走了我們的土地並強迫我們成為美國人
https://rumble.com/v3i3a8g-hawaiian-said-we-are-not-proud-americans.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8j93rpT/

The more US radical politicians try to suppress China’s companies, the more they will stimulate Chinese creativity 美國激進政客越是打壓中國企業，就越會激發中國創造力

Ten Republican lawmakers jointly sent a letter dated Thursday to Alan Estevez, undersecretary of Commerce for Industry and Security, exerting pressure and presenting seven demands. These demands include the establishment of a new agency dedicated to controlling the export of American technology to China, imposing “full blocking sanctions” on both Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) and Huawei, and placing all their subsidiary companies on the Entity List. Their attitude is extremely arrogant, even going so far as to demand criminal charges against executives of SMIC and Huawei.

There are several possibilities going forward. The first is that these legislators fail, and their demands are not accepted by the US government. These legislators have always been the most radical anti-China force in the US.

The second is that the US government, following these lawmakers, goes crazy, leading to further failure for the US. Previous rounds of sanctions against Huawei were already very harsh, causing Huawei to withdraw from the 5G smartphone business. SMIC has also long been on the US Department of Commerce’s Entity List, being a key target of restrictions for US and its allies. Now, how the Kirin 9000S chip used in the Huawei Mate 60 Pro is produced has not been disclosed by Huawei. However, a significant fact is that Huawei has pierced through the network of US sanctions.

In the era of globalization, it is impossible for blockade wall to be completely airtight. Huawei has strong research and development capabilities, and Chinese companies have already formed a solid national industrial foundation, which can support their ability to independently develop key technologies. When these two factors are combined, the US cannot hinder Huawei’s development simply by building a taller and larger blockade wall. Since Huawei has openly released the Mate 60 Pro, there must be a backup plan. If the US builds a new blockade wall, the first to be actually sanctioned will be American and its allies’ companies. Huawei will definitely be able to withstand it. Today’s Huawei is even stronger than it was in 2019. It couldn’t be defeated four years ago, and now and in the future, there is no way to suffocate it.

Thirdly, if the US brings criminal charges against SMIC and Huawei executives, it will signify a new confrontation. This is not an area where the US can unilaterally act without facing any consequences. The US will not gain any additional advantage from this, so they better abandon this idea.

Extreme American politicians need to understand that the Chinese people are much more intelligent than they imagine and possess a collective will to never surrender. The more they try to block and pressure, the more they will stimulate creativity in Chinese society. Decoupling and severing supply chain will cause losses for both China and the US, but the US is persisting in the wrong way while China is creating in the right way. Therefore, the US is bound to suffer more loss.

GT Voice: Hype on iPhone ‘ban’ shows US has a guilty conscience. iPhone “禁令” 炒作顯示美國心虛.

The biggest destroyer of the global economic and trade order is being paranoid. This is perhaps the most incisive and vivid explanation of why the US government and media outlets have seen a rumored ban on iPhones as China’s retaliation against the US.

US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby told reporters on Wednesday that the US believes China’s reported move to institute and expand a government ban on iPhones “seems to be of a piece – of the kinds of aggressive and inappropriate retaliation to US companies … That’s what this appears to be,” according to a Bloomberg report on Thursday.

Not only did the US official say it’s retaliation, but US media outlets have hyped the rumored government ban and misinterpreted it as China’s retaliation against Apple for the sake of Huawei.

But there are no laws, regulations or policy documents in China that prohibit the purchase and use of mobile phones of overseas brands, such as Apple. And compared to the situation faced by Apple in China, Huawei is far from receiving fair treatment in the US.

With no specific and detailed facts to verify the existence of such a ban, we have no idea why the US government and media outlets are so eager to escalate an unverified rumor as being China’s retaliation. They could have communicated with the Chinese authorities first to clear up any misunderstandings. If they insist on making a political interpretation of a rumor, then the only reason is because they know they have done too many unconscionable things to suppress Chinese companies with unilateral sanctions, and they are too anxious and concerned about retaliation now. The concern in Washington is not toward Apple, but rather toward the sustainability of their unethical business practices.

There is no denying that after a series of security incidents involving Apple’s iPhones, it is possible that some consumers, and not just in China, may be concerned about whether or not iPhones have higher security risks.

It will take time and facts for global consumers to find out whether iPhones have security risks. But one thing is certain – as long as Apple abides by Chinese laws and regulations and operates based on the rules of the international order, protecting consumers’ data stored in their mobile phones to ensure information security, it would not face any policy barrier in China.

Despite some potential consumer concerns, US tech companies are doing pretty well in China. For instance, China overtook the US to become Apple’s largest market in the second quarter of this year for the first time, according to research firm TechInsights. Also, Tesla’s revenue in China reached $5.73 billion in the second quarter, up 51.33 percent year-on-year. The growth rate apparently outpaced the increase of its revenue in other global markets.

If anything, US sensitivity to a rumored ban only lays bare its anxiety about losing the market. Deep down, the root cause is that it knows what it has done to Chinese companies would arouse retaliation if it happened to US companies.

Indeed, US media outlets may not even be able to tell which American move the rumored Chinese ban on iPhones is in retaliation for, because there are too many cases of the US suppressing Chinese companies and products in the name of “national security.”

Why didn’t US media outlets question their own government’s behavior, which sabotaged the international trade order in the first place? How brazen are they to label China as the party that retaliated without mentioning what the US did first?

To name a few issues, the US did not just impose strict sanctions on Huawei but also asked its allies to do the same. It exerted pressure on TikTok to force a sale of shares to American companies with hooligan means. Washington has also used so-called human rights issues as an excuse to sanction Chinese manufacturing sector and Chinese companies.

If Washington is really worried about Chinese retaliation and US companies’ interests, why not reflect on what the US has done to China and its companies? Putting aside political calculations, which are not in the interest of bilateral economic relations, and returning to the path of seeking the right solution, is the most effective therapy for Washington’s paranoia and anxiety.

Video: If I read the letter correctly, Rosaryhill School Hong Kong as we have known it in its current form and operation since 1959 is heading to the sunset and our school reunion in November 2023 in Hong Kong could be the last one 😢. 視頻：如果我沒看錯這封信，自 1959 年以來我們所知的香港玫瑰崗學校目前的形式和運作正在走向夕陽，我們 2023 年 11 月在香港舉行的同學聚會可能是最後一次 😢.
https://rumble.com/v3i19sy-rosaryhill-school-hong-kong-is-heading-to-the-sunset.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8jHbLeG/

Australia gains nothing from AUKUS, but sells its soul to US 澳大利亞從AUKUS中一無所獲，卻將靈魂出賣給了美國

I am glad that Rosaryhill School HK taught us Mandarin, watched 100s of Shaw’s Brothers Mandarin Speaking Movies growing up in HK! After graduating from University in Hawaii got into consulting business have 100s of Mandarin speaking clients in Hawaii, appointed by Gary Locke, Secretary of Commerce of the US Dept of Commerce to promote trade between US-China until Trump kills it. Understanding Mandarin does not allow Western Governments especially the US Government brainwashing us with fake news propaganda demonizing Chinese, Chinese Americans and China because understanding Mandarin we could see the truth and real news that is not allowed in the United States controlled by the Military Industrial Complex. This is my personal experience living for more than 4 decades in America. 我很高興香港玫瑰崗學校教我們普通話，在香港長大觀看數百部邵氏普通話電影! 夏威夷大學畢業後進入諮詢行業，在夏威夷擁有數百名講普通話的客戶，受美國商務部商務部長駱家輝任命，促進中美貿易，直至特朗普將其扼殺。 理解普通話不允許西方政府，特別是美國政府用假新聞宣傳給我們洗腦，因為理解普通話我們可以看到真相和真實的新聞，妖魔化華人、華裔美國人和中國的行為被暴露， 這是在軍事工業聯合體控制下的美國和美國政府是不允許的。 這是我在美國生活四十多年的個人經歷.

CNN interview video: cut an live interview on why Elon Musk cut off Starlink to Ukraine. CNN採訪視頻：現場採訪關於埃隆·馬斯克為何切斷通往烏克蘭的星鏈
https://rumble.com/v3hws6e-cnn-cut-an-live-interview-on-why-elon-musk-cut-off-starlink-to-ukraine.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8j54fMM/