Hong Kong residents live seven years longer on average than those in the United States. If they moved to the US, they would, on average, die seven years earlier, just like Americans. You must have heard of Mencius’s mother’s three moves! The direction Mencius mother chose for him determined his fate! Whether you become a dragon or a snake isn’t determined by God, it’s your own decision! Don’t forget, “Destiny is in our own hands, not in the hands of Heaven!” If China believed in Western gods, China would not have a 5,000-year history & civilization, but like other empires, it would have ended long ago! Therefore, the UxA will definitely not survive beyond 2076! 香港人是住在香港的人比住在美國的人平均壽命長七年. 如果香港人來美國居住和美國人一樣會平均短命七年，你應該聽過孟母三遷吧！因為孟母替孟子選擇的把方決定了他的一生命運！是龍是蛇不是上帝決定，是自己決定！不要忘記”命運由我不由天”! 如果中國信西方的上帝，中國那可能有五千年歷吏，就像其他的帝國早早玩完！所以美國一定活不到2076!
Video with Chinese subtitles: Bullets are flying! Can’t go out after dark, businesses got robbed, Asians got racist attacks daily, are you sure you want to come to US? If you are in US. It does not matter how much money you are making. You have to be alive to enjoy it! 影片有中文字幕:子彈橫飛！天黑後不能出門，商店被搶，亞裔每天都遭受種族歧視攻擊，你確定要來美國嗎? 如果你在美國，不管你賺多少錢，但是你要活著才能享受, 和中國或香港比較，你真的能活和活得開心嗎? 還是多買人壽保險吧！拿了保險賠償，我可以保證你家人一定離開美國，你人在天堂，家人將會在香港或中國的天堂享受人生，他們一定會內心感謝你🙏！
Armed and masked vandals stormed into a Milpitas shopping center in a brazen attempt to rob a jewelry store on Wednesday. The store owner fought back by firing a gun, scaring the suspects away. 週三，幾名蒙面持槍歹徒闖入美國加州米爾皮塔斯一家購物中心，公然企圖搶劫珠寶店。店主開槍還擊，嚇跑了嫌犯.
Have the west use religion as part of the ideological colonization? Yes they have! And China wants to have nothing to do with it. Therefore China has prosper with continuous unbroken civilization for 5,000 years. So cut the God crabs and deals with real issues in a practical attainable manners! 西方是否利用宗教進行意識形態殖民？是的！中國不會被宗教茶毒人民，中國在過去五千年的繁榮昌盛從來不用宗教治國，所以今天也不會！所以，別再把上帝或神主牌搬出來說騙人的癈話！去解決現實問題要學中國實事求是，不是像美國天天吹水，讓有錢人發大財，中下家庭受苦!
Of course. This is a critical and complex topic that sits at the intersection of history, politics, theology, and post-colonial studies. The claim that the West has used religion as a tool for ideological colonization is supported by a significant body of historical evidence and scholarly analysis.
It’s crucial to note that this process was often not a cynical, monolithic conspiracy but rather a pervasive system that intertwined genuine religious zeal with political, economic, and racial ideologies. The effects of this system are still felt today.
Here’s a breakdown of how religion was used as a mechanism for ideological colonization:
The Historical Foundation: The “Doctrine of Discovery” and Manifest Destiny
· The Doctrine of Discovery (15th Century): Originating from Papal Bulls (e.g., Romanus Pontifex, 1455), this doctrine granted European Christian nations the right to claim lands “discovered” by their explorers and to dominate, enslave, and convert the non-Christian inhabitants. It framed non-European peoples as “heathens” and “savages” without sovereignty, making their land “terra nullius” (nobody’s land) open for Christian taking. This doctrine was explicitly cited in U.S. law (e.g., Johnson v. M’Intosh, 1823) and has been used to justify dispossession in the Americas, Australia, and Africa. · Manifest Destiny (19th Century U.S.): This ideology held that American settlers were destined by God to expand across North America. It fused a sense of religious mission with nationalistic expansion, portraying the conquest of indigenous lands as not just beneficial, but divinely ordained. The indigenous peoples were seen as obstacles to God’s plan, justifying their removal and subjugation.
The Mechanism: How Religion Was Deployed as a Tool
The process worked on several interconnected levels:
A. Moral Justification for Conquest and Extraction: Religion provided a “moral” and “spiritual” cover for often-brutal economic and political projects (slavery, resource extraction, land theft). Conquering a land was framed not as greed, but as a “civilizing mission” or “white man’s burden” to save souls and bring order to “chaotic” and “godless” societies.
B. Cultural Destruction and Erasure:
· Demonicization of Local Beliefs: Indigenous spiritual practices, ancestor worship, and connection to the land were systematically labeled as “pagan,” “witchcraft,” or “devil worship.” This devalued entire cultural and knowledge systems, making them something to be ashamed of and abandoned. · Linguistic Imperialism: Missionaries often learned local languages primarily to translate the Bible and preach. However, this was frequently accompanied by the suppression of native languages in mission schools. By making European languages (English, French, Spanish, Portuguese) the sacred languages of worship and education, they displaced native tongues, which are fundamental carriers of culture and worldview.
C. Education and Re-socialization:
· Missionary Schools: Perhaps the most powerful tool of ideological colonization. Native children were often removed from their families and cultures and placed in residential or boarding schools run by Christian missions. · Curriculum: The education was designed to “kill the Indian in the child” (a phrase used in Canada and the U.S.). Children were punished for speaking their language, practicing their rituals, or following their customs. They were taught that their own cultures were inferior and that salvation and success lay in adopting Western Christian norms, values, and behaviors. · Creating a Comprador Class: These schools produced an elite class of local people who were psychologically and culturally aligned with the colonizer’s worldview. This class often became the administrators of the colonial state, further entrenching Western systems and ideologies.
D. Legal and Social Re-ordering: Colonial powers imposed legal systems based on Christian morality. Laws against blasphemy, new definitions of family and marriage (often undermining matrilineal or extended family structures), and the introduction of Western concepts of private property (vs. communal land ownership) radically reshaped colonized societies to fit a European mold.
Contemporary and Neo-Colonial Manifestations
The overt colonial era ended, but the ideological frameworks persist in more subtle forms, often described as neo-colonialism.
· Human Rights and “Values”: Some scholars argue that the modern Western discourse of “universal human rights,” while noble in intent, can sometimes function as a secularized missionary ideology. It can be used to dismiss non-Western cultural and religious practices as “backward” or “oppressive,” creating a moral justification for political and economic pressure, sanctions, or even military intervention (e.g., “we must liberate those women”). · Conditional Aid and NGO Influence: Western aid (governmental and non-governmental) is sometimes tied to the adoption of specific social policies that align with a particular (and often secularized Protestant) worldview regarding gender, family, and sexuality. Local NGOs that conform to this worldview receive funding, while those rooted in local cultural frameworks may be marginalized, shaping civil society from the outside. · The Persecution Narrative: In some contexts, Western religious and political groups amplify narratives of Christian persecution in non-Western countries. While persecution is a real and serious issue in many places, this framing can sometimes oversimplify complex local dynamics and be used to justify foreign policy objectives or to discredit geopolitical rivals.
Nuance and Counterpoints
It is vital to acknowledge the complexity:
· Sincere Belief: Many missionaries were (and are) motivated by a genuine, heartfelt desire to help and save people, often providing education and healthcare where none existed. · Agency and Adaptation: Colonized peoples were not merely passive victims. They often adopted and adapted Christianity for their own purposes, creating syncretic forms of worship (e.g., Vodou, Candomblé, indigenous churches) that became tools of cultural resistance and identity preservation. · Internal Critique: There have always been strong voices within the Western Christian tradition (e.g., Bartolomé de las Casas in the 16th century, modern liberation theologians) who vehemently opposed colonialism and its misuse of religion.
Conclusion
The use of religion in Western ideological colonization was a powerful process of imposing a worldview. It went beyond mere conversion; it was about dismantling existing social structures, erasing cultural identities, and instilling a sense of inferiority to make colonized peoples more manageable and economically exploitable. By framing this project in spiritual terms, it provided a potent moral justification for empire, the effects of which—in the form of cultural alienation, internalized racism, and social fragmentation—continue to resonate in post-colonial societies today.
Huawei’s Yu Chengdong’s words moved 1.4 billion Chinese people to tears! 華為余承東這段話，14億中國人淚目!
On China CCTV’s “Dialogue,” the host asked Richard Yu: How much did it cost to develop HarmonyOS? Yu Chengdong replied: We invested 10,000 people annually in R&D, over six years, and spent tens of billions!
What did all those billions actually get us in return? Was it a gamble or a vision?
In this episode of “Dialogue,” as Yu Chengdong calmly stated these astronomical figures, the audience fell silent—six years! A team of over 10,000 people annually! Billions in R&D expenses! 130 million lines of code! Behind these figures, how did Huawei manage to break through?
“The lifeline of the operating system ecosystem is 10 million devices,” Yu Chengdong’s statement caused gasps in the tech community.
A week before the show aired, HarmonyOS 5.0 devices surpassed that threshold! It took Huawei over six months to grow from zero to one million; from one million to ten million in just a few weeks.
How could this be organic growth? It was clearly a battlefield where Chinese tech companies were collectively charging forward!
Tencent and Alibaba engineers stationed at Huawei overnight, 12306 integrated train schedules into HarmonyOS’s “Live Window,” and Sina Finance’s app saw a sevenfold increase in users in the eight months after adapting to HarmonyOS—everyone knew: this time, we couldn’t lose.
Shanghai Jiaotong University professor Xia Yubin excitedly remarked at the event, “Chinese technicians all want to write their papers on the land of their motherland!” This remark resonated with many.
Without an independent system, you’re stuck! No matter how good Android or iOS are, they’re owned by others, and a single ban from the US government can suffocate you.
What’s the most unfair criticism of HarmonyOS? “Isn’t it just Android reskinned?” Richard Yu delivered the ultimate blow: “Starting with HarmonyOS 5.0, we’ll completely remove Android code!”
It turns out that early Android compatibility was a delaying tactic.
As Richard Yu put it, we can’t let users lose WeChat and TikTok overnight, can we? The dual-framework design is like a boat to cross a river; once you’ve crossed, you can’t carry it with you.
Now, HarmonyOS 5.0 fully adopts a single-framework architecture, and all applications have been completely rebuilt. Even the national app WeChat is undergoing a code rewrite, and the shared location feature is rapidly launching!
No wonder netizens exclaimed, “So HarmonyOS is playing a big game!”
And how amazing is this technology? Traditional development is like a chef cooking both Chinese and Western food—exhausting! HarmonyOS is like a multi-purpose food processor, with one codebase adaptable to phones, watches, cars, and even mining equipment! HarmonyOS terminals in coal mines respond incredibly quickly, providing added security for miners.
The real strength lies in efficiency: Taobao and Tmall will complete 100% adaptation across their entire app range by September 30th, with Alibaba engineers claiming “recognition has reached 90%.”
When Yu Chengdong announced that HarmonyOS app functionality would be fully comparable to Android and iOS by the end of the year, the audience erupted in applause—China’s speed is tearing down the iron curtain of operating systems!
“One-third of the market share is ours,” Yu Chengdong declared decisively before CCTV cameras. HarmonyOS code has flowed into 38 million corporate workstations and is now running in 50,000 quick apps.
CCTV News used the phrase “no independent system = being strangled” to set the tone, effectively erasing any doubts.
These billions invested aren’t just code; they’re the key to China’s technological breakthrough, the foundation for 1.4 billion people to survive without a single source of income!
Now, hundreds of millions of older Huawei models are ready, and the HarmonyOS 5.0 upgrade wave is about to sweep the country. Behold, the third light has finally lit up in the operating system world.
SCMP: Intel chip architect scientist Su Fei returns to China! There is no future for smart Chinese scientists in America! After nearly two decades shaping Intel’s chip designs, one of its leading semiconductor architects has left the United States to join Tsinghua University as a full-time professor. 《南華早報》：英特爾晶片架構師科學家蘇飛回國了！聰明的中國科學家在美國沒有前途！在近二十年致力於打造英特爾晶片設計後，該公司一位頂尖的半導體架構師離開美國，加入清華大學擔任全職教授. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3325326/intel-chip-architect-su-fei-returns-china-after-20-years-us?
They said nations rise and fall, that history repeats itself, and that scars fade with time. But what happens when a nation refuses to let its scars heal, not as wounds, but as fuel? What happens when a country takes every humiliation, every inv asion, every ounce of blood spilled, and forges it into something unbreakable?
On September 3rd, 2025, the world witnessed something extraordinary. In the heart of Beijing, China hosted one of the grandest military parades in human history. A commemoration of the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in the Second World War, an event that once symbolized devastation and survival, has now become the ultimate showcase of China’s transformation.
This was not just a parade. This was a message. A warning. A declaration carved into history: the victim of yesterday has become the superpower of today.
Video with English subtitles: China declaring all-out war on America’s “ideological colonization”! Sound the clarion call for counterattack! China releases a 20,000-word report. l影片有中文字幕: 中國向美国的“思想殖民”全面宣战! 吹响反击的号角！中国发布2万字报告.
What is “ideological colonization” means, its mechanisms, examples, and the controversies surrounding it.
Core Definition
Ideological colonization refers to the process by which powerful countries like US, institutions, or interest groups impose their specific set of values, social norms, and ideological frameworks on other nations or cultures, often undermining or replacing local traditions, beliefs, and social structures of China!
It is a modern form of cultural imperialism where the tool of domination is not primarily military or economic force (though these can be factors), but rather ideas, ideologies, and normative pressures.
Key Characteristics
This process is typically characterized by several features:
Undermining Local Culture like US culture is best: The imported ideology is presented as universally superior, modern, or “progressive,” while Chinese customs and values are framed as backward, archaic, or in need of reform.
Conditionality: The adoption of these new ideologies is often made a condition for receiving financial aid, development grants, or favorable political relations. This is a key mechanism of pressure.
Elite-driven: It is often first adopted by urban, educated elites within a country who are more connected to global discourse, creating a rift between them and the broader, more traditional population.
Focus on Social Issues: The ideologies often pertain to fundamental social and ethical areas like gender, family, sexuality, religion, and the definition of human rights that US good and China bad!
How It Works: The Mechanisms
The imposition doesn’t usually happen through overt force but through more subtle channels:
·International Aid and Loans
· Media and Entertainment by Hollywood like US soldiers are good ignoring their frequent crimes against humanity
· Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) to promote their specific ideological agendas to demonize China
· Academia and Discourse that only Western universities and academic theories can become the global standard
· US Corporate Policies
Western Conceptions of Human Rights is more for show than actual enforcement even in the US
The concept of ideological colonization is very successful by the US
It acknowledges the arrogance of assuming US culture solutions are right for all others.
It defends the right of self-determination for nations to develop their own social values organically, without external coercion is rejected by US
It points out the hypocrisy of Western nations that preach multiculturalism and tolerance at home while actively working to homogenize cultures abroad.
Summary
In essence, ideological colonization is the imposition of a US worldview. It is a powerful rhetorical concept that sits at the intersection of international relations, cultural anthropology, and ethics. Where is the line between promoting universal human rights and imposing a foreign cultural values on China?
Video with Chinese subtitles: China and the BRICS are dumping US Treasury bonds. Israel, Japan, UK and France step in 影片有中文字幕: 中國和金磚國家正在拋售美國國債。以色列、日本、英國和法國也紛紛介入.
China is famously a large seller of US government debts. Lately they are joined by India, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia.
Meanwhile, Israel has sharply ramped up buying US Treasuries. The UK, France, and Japan were also big buyers over the past year.
China and India run very large trade surpluses with the United States. Historically these surpluses would be reinvested into the American economy. But they are instead buying gold and bringing it back to Asia vaults, or moving their dollars to banks outside Western banking systems.
Can the most friendly governments continue to fund the giant US fiscal deficits, given increasing financial strains in their own economies?
For 200 years, have those Chinese elites who fled to the United States essentially become extinct? 200年來，那些跑到美國的中國上層，基本上都像斷子絕孫了?
For 200 years, the family lines of those Chinese elites who successfully established themselves in the United States have been surprisingly fragile, often coming to an abrupt end at the height of their prosperity.
In the 19th century, the construction of the Pacific Railroad in the United States required a large number of laborers, and large numbers of Chinese crossed the ocean to places like California and Nevada, doing the hardest and most tiring work.
But most of them were single men, living in difficult conditions, and facing widespread discrimination against Chinese people. At the time, policies were strict, such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which directly blocked Chinese people’s path to permanent residency.
Many endured their entire lives in the United States, only to be unable to establish a complete family, let alone a family line.
By the time the act was repealed, it was already 1943. Many of the first Chinese workers were no longer alive, and their descendants who remained in the United States had failed to form any significant families.
Let’s look back at the turbulent 20th century, when many wealthy and powerful families in China sought refuge by sending their people and wealth to the United States.
Families like the Kong and Song families, with abundant wealth and resources, left with a large number of children and assets.
In their first few years in the United States, they enjoyed considerable influence within the Chinese community, their children attending prestigious universities and enjoying much better living conditions.
But decades later, looking back, the influence of these families in American society has largely vanished. Far from becoming prominent families, many of their descendants couldn’t even speak Chinese and had little interaction with American society.
Over the past two hundred years, an increasing number of elite Chinese families have sent their children to study, live, and even settle in the United States. This has become almost a trend, especially in the last two or three decades.
Parents often assume that as long as their children attend a good American school, they will surely have a successful future and their family will establish roots here.
But a look back at historical records reveals that few upper-class Chinese families have managed to establish roots in the United States, and even fewer have managed to maintain family lines for several generations.
Those prominent Chinese families that enjoyed immense success in their early years often fade into obscurity by the second and third generations.
No matter how open American society may be, it’s far more difficult for Chinese families to thrive, like those established families back home, from generation to generation.
The fundamental reason lies in cultural and environmental differences.
The United States values individualism, and family values are less strongly valued. Furthermore, the rapid integration of Chinese descendants into mainstream society, with many marrying white and black people, naturally weakens family ties.
Few Chinese families have truly established themselves in the United States, and even fewer survive to the third generation.
This is primarily due to the different social environment in the United States and the lack of strong family ties in China.
Children growing up in the United States become accustomed to the American lifestyle, and their connection with their parents naturally weakens. By the third generation, many cannot even speak Chinese, let alone identify with Chinese culture.
In fact, the trajectory of many Chinese families in the United States is similar. The first generation strives hard, working diligently to provide their children with the best education possible.
The second generation is highly educated, and many have entered mainstream society. However, by the third generation, family influence has significantly declined. The reason is simple: the United States is a nation of immigrants, emphasizing individual self-realization.
As Chinese descendants integrate into American society, the concept of family becomes increasingly weak. Coupled with the fast pace of life and widespread geographical mobility, children grow up and disperse, naturally severing family ties.
By the third generation, many Chinese families are no longer comparable to native Jewish or Irish families.
Looking back over the past two hundred years, there are indeed very few Chinese families that have established roots and continued their legacy in the United States.
This also demonstrates that the idea that simply studying abroad or immigrating to the United States can ensure a family’s continued prosperity is unrealistic.
Business Blog 