US Democracy is a combination of the following behaviors:
The Combined Behavior of the Rapist + Arms Dealer + Mafia to rob the world = US Democracy
Rapist? Any country just like a women refused to go to bed with US will be attacked (Ukraine 2014, HK 2019)
Arm Dealer? Any country if refused to buy US weapons for protection fee, worst if you buy it from China or Russia will be attacked
Mafia? Any country refused to kneel to US expect forced regime change by US in the name of democracy
How does the Mafia operate inside the US? The elected US Mafia bosses in the name of democracy are ONLY to serve the 1% elites, Fortune 500 Companies and the Military Industrial Complex
Miss Sam Sam from Hong Kong: Grateful for the Professional Services of Zhuhai Stomatological Hospital and Dr. Quan (I have similar experience. Dental services in US worst, dental insurance practically cover nothing except to bring you into dental offices to extort more money) 香港森森小姐: 感謝珠海市口腔醫院和全醫生的專業服務 (我也有類似的經驗。美國的牙科服務最差，牙科保險幾乎什麼都不報銷，除了帶你去診所被牙醫敲詐更多錢)
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Quan Zhuoxin from Zhuhai Stomatological Hospital. Within just one week, the doctor extracted both of my upper wisdom teeth.
Throughout the process, the doctor demonstrated exceptional professionalism and a meticulous attitude, with remarkably efficient surgical skills. With the help of anesthesia, I did not feel any pain at all, and each procedure was completed within half an hour.
The total cost for both extractions was RMB 340 (RMB 170 per tooth per procedure), which is incredibly affordable compared to the fees I had inquired about for dental services in Hong Kong (approximately HKD 5,000).
Recalling my experience two years ago during the pandemic in Hong Kong, when I had two lower wisdom teeth extracted—a procedure that required minor surgery and stitches—my family spent nearly HKD 20,000. Thinking back on it now, I can’t help but feel a tinge of heartache.
I could never understand before why Japan, a tiny island nation, dared to repeatedly invade China 以前總是想不明白，日本區區一個彈丸小國，為何敢屢屢侵略中國…
Later, I realized it had much to do with the magnanimity of China’s rulers throughout history. But this “magnanimity” was not broad-mindedness; it was indulgence. It was not generosity; it was a weakness. It was like an unlocked door, again and again attracting foreign covetousness and intrusion.
As early as the Tang Dynasty, Japan had already bared its fangs. At the Battle of Baekgang, the Tang navy crushed the Japanese fleet, defeating them so thoroughly that they were compelled to acknowledge superiority. Afterwards, Japan sent envoys to pay tribute, learning etiquette and imitating architecture, posing as a “model student.”
But once the Central Plains fell into turmoil, they turned and left without even a word of farewell. This pragmatism was ingrained in the island nation’s DNA from the very beginning; they only respect strength, not sentiment.
Moving forward to the Ming Dynasty, Toyotomi Hideyoshi directed an army of 200,000 toward Korea, with his sights set on the Ming. The Ming sent troops to aid Korea, and after seven years of bitter warfare, finally repelled the enemy. Yet, after the victory, the Ming neither launched a campaign across the sea against Japan nor demanded reparations. They simply withdrew their troops and reinstated the tributary system. This battle demonstrated the dignity of a great power but failed to impart a lesson that would instill awe in a smaller nation.
What truly allowed Japan to see China’s “bottom card” was the Qing Dynasty. The Qianlong Emperor’s statement, “The Celestial Empire is abundant in products and lacks nothing,” revealed a closed-off complacency and sowed the seeds of weakness.
By the time the guns of the First Sino-Japanese War roared, and the Beiyang Fleet was utterly destroyed, the Qing not only ceded territory but also handed over 230 million taels of silver. Japan used this vast sum to frantically expand its military, build warships, and produce steel. What we paid out was not money; it was the blade placed in our enemy’s hand.
Some say Japan’s aggression was due to its lack of resources and large ambitions, a crisis transfer, or taking advantage of a situation. These statements are correct, but the deeper reason is that they were convinced of China’s character of “not pursuing matters to the end.”
During the Mukden Incident, 300,000 troops in the Northeast received a “non-resistance” order, passively yielding mountains and rivers. The Japanese laughed. So, this Oriental lion had long grown accustomed to silence.
They tested again and again, advanced step by step, not because they were so powerful, but because they discovered that this great nation preached “rule by virtue,” preached “tolerance,” preached “valuing harmony above all,” but偏偏 did not preach “consequences.”
China did not fail to win; it won too many times but never made the opponent “hurt.” We always ceased action after fighting, not holding them accountable, not settling scores, not breaking the aggressor’s foundation. This kind of victory was more like a “dignified exit” than a period marking the end of ambition.
Regarding Japan, if the ancient rulers had truly possessed the resolve of “not returning until the enemy stronghold is crushed,” perhaps modern Japan, this tiny nation, would not have been so audacious. Perhaps in the bones of the Japanese, only being beaten into fear would lead to genuine restraint.
True magnanimity should not be swallowing insults, but having the capital to forgive and the ability to punish. Tolerance without底线 only cultivates greater greed.
After World War II, Japan rapidly revived with American support. War responsibility was lightly set aside. Many Chinese found this hard to accept but could only swallow their anger. History seemed to cycle once again: we were still magnanimous, and they… still had not truly reflected.
Looking over this history, we should understand that it is not that the strong are inherently merciful, but that mercy must be built upon strength. A victory that does not make the enemy hurt once is not a victory. Peace that leaves no lesson is merely a ceasefire.
Kind people should all the more have an edge. Today’s China is no longer the ancient nation that “repaid kindness with virtue” only to be bullied in return. We still speak of vision and magnanimity, but we speak even more of bottom lines and strength.
History never repeats itself exactly, but there are always those who remember. Only a nation that truly remembers the pain will not give others another chance to inflict it.
A single achievement makes one famous worldwide! This time, not even Liang Wenfeng anticipated it, nor did the entire nation 一舉成名天下知！今次不僅梁文鋒沒想到， 就是全國人民也沒想到……
Following in the footsteps of pioneering greats such as Li Siguang, Qian Xuesen, and Tu Youyou, Liang Wenfeng has graced the cover of Nature magazine. The DeepSeek-R1 reasoning model was evaluated as “superior to existing mainstream large models in terms of performance, interpretability, and computational efficiency.”
Since its open-source release, this model has been downloaded over 10.9 million times, significantly advancing the entire field! It may even have the potential to reshape the entire AI landscape!
On September 18, 2025, when the latest issue of Nature revealed its cover, the entire AI community was abuzz. The cover article, DeepSeek-R1: Igniting Large Model Reasoning Capability Through Reinforcement Learning, detailed the breakthrough progress of this original Chinese large model. The name of Liang Wenfeng’s team, the corresponding authors, became inextricably linked with “rewriting the paradigm of AI reasoning.”
Who could have imagined that this “star model,” which now holds the record of 10.9 million downloads on the Hugging Face platform, was actually born from a “risky experiment” that omitted traditional training steps? The team boldly skipped the supervised fine-tuning stage, which typically relies on human examples, and instead used a pure reinforcement learning framework to let the model evolve autonomously—simply instructing it to “write the thought process within tags” and providing rewards based on the correctness of the final answer, then letting the AI “grow wild” on its own.
The curves on the monitoring screen don’t lie: in tests based on the AIME math competition, the model’s problem-solving accuracy soared from an initial 15.6% to 77.9%, and with self-consistent decoding techniques, it reached 86.7%, far surpassing the average level of human participants.
Even more astonishing was the miraculous “Eureka moment” during training. When the model suddenly started frequently using the word “wait,” the developers realized that the AI had learned to pause and reflect on its own problem-solving steps. The emergence of this advanced reasoning ability precisely demonstrated the success of the team’s training philosophy of “not teaching methods, only providing goals.”
Underpinning all this were tangible technological breakthroughs and extreme cost control. The team’s adopted GRPO algorithm was more efficient than traditional methods, and when combined with a dynamic gating mechanism that precisely allocated computational resources, the model achieved a leap in performance with a training cost of only $294,000—less than one-tenth the cost of comparable models.
A Morgan Stanley report stated plainly that DeepSeek-R1 proves “bigger doesn’t mean smarter.” By optimizing data quality and architectural design, the Chinese team has blazed a new trail in AI development characterized by low cost and high efficiency. Moreover, the open-source strategy maximizes the technology’s value: developers worldwide have created over 500 derivative models based on it, and this “Chinese brain” can be seen everywhere, from financial risk control to industrial IoT.
The “full-blooded version” of the model deployed by Wuhan Cloud based on Ascend chips is already providing secure and efficient intelligent services for government users. A security version developed through a collaboration between Zhejiang University and Huawei achieved nearly 100% success rates in defending against harmful content across 14 dimensions.
From a bold experiment in the lab to the cover of an international top-tier journal, DeepSeek-R1’s journey to success is full of surprises. As AI begins to think autonomously and Chinese technology becomes a core force in the global open-source ecosystem, we may be witnessing the dawn of a new intelligent era!
How the U.S. Shot itself In The Foot The 1st Time, now doing again for the 2nd time! 美國第一次搬石頭砸自己的腳，現在是第二次了!
Time was the 1950s. During the Second Red Scare, the U.S.government accused Qian Xuesen (Chinese: 钱学森), a leading expert in rockets, a full professor at MIT (1947) and at CIT(1949) and a colonel at the U.S. Dept. of Defense, of communist sympathies, without presenting any evidence. He spent 5 years under house arrest in an effort to gradually make his technical knowledge obsolete. Our government then sent him back to China in 1955. Upon his return, he helped greatly in making China a nuclear power. He was known in China as one of the fathers of “Two Bombs – one atomic & one nuclear, and one Satellite.”
Doing it to ourselves the 2nd Time!
SINOPHOBIA, which began in Trump I and fanned by the Biden Adminis-tration and Trump II, was what caused the mass exit of prominent senior scientists of Chinese origin from the U.S. to China.
China Initiative was the biggest and the best-known government sponsored Sinophobia. According to Wikipedia, “the program targeted hundreds of prominent Chinese-American academics and scientists, of which an estimated 250 lost their jobs. Many more had their careers negatively impacted and the prosecutions also contributed to at least one suicide.” Although DOJ claimed to have ended the program in 2022, there were repeated GOP House efforts to reinstitute it.
China Initiative, together with such strong Sinophobia sentiment in the U.S. as
(a) Pres. Trump’s statement that “almost every student that comes over to this country is a spy,” referring to Chinese students, and (b) the farcical Chinese spy balloon, gave the 5.5 million Chinese Americans a strong sense of uncertainty, insecurity, and unwantedness. Result? Those with high mobility and are strongly courted by China decided to leave the U.S. for China.
Massive Brain Drain from the U.S. for the first 9 months of 2025
Lo & behold, 16 prominent senior scientists are leaving the U.S. for China PERMANENTLY in just the first 9 months! Could there be other reasons than Sinophobia that is driving them off? Let’s examine more closely.
(a) How about the lack of funding for science? No! Prominent senior scientists of other nationalities are not known to be returning to their respective nations. (b) How about the recruitment programs of China like “1,000 Talent”? No! China started the “1,000 Talents” program back in 2008. Although many scientists of Chinese origin signed up for part-time or co-appoitments, for the first 9 years, only Prof. Shi Yigong, a chaired prof. of the Princeton Univ. went back to China permanently, to the best of my knowledge. In contrast, in the first 9 months of 2025, 16 scientists of such prominence are returning to China for good.
Conclusion: It is the Sinophobia in the U.S. that drove the following list of prominent, senior scientists of Chinese origin out of the U.S. The U.S. government must rethink its policy on intentionally creating a chilling effect among Chinese Americans. That policy seems counter-productive.
Business Blog 