Video with Chinese subtitles: Huawei’s patented 3nm Breakthrough Using Self-Made EUV Surprises the World! 影片有中文字幕：華為採用自主研發的EUV光刻技術，突破3nm製程工藝，震撼世界
https://rumble.com/v72veli-huaweis-patented-3nm-breakthrough-using-self-made-euv-surprises-the-world.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UTjsGp/

Look at the SCMP headline news, Nvidia planted tracking devices that means Nvidia chips have backdoors! Nvidia chips must be banned in China. 看看這則香港南華早報新聞標題：英偉達植入追蹤設備，這意味著英偉達晶片有後門！英偉達晶片必須在中國被禁售.

820,000 Chinese have immigrated to the United States — why do they hold only green cards instead of becoming citizens? 82萬中國人移民美國，為什么都只拿綠卡，不入籍?

They take the U.S. green card, but reject U.S. citizenship. Among the 820,000 Chinese immigrants in the U.S., more than half clearly meet the requirements for naturalization, yet they would rather keep holding that green card and are in no hurry to “upgrade.”

For many Chinese in America, the biggest appeal of the green card is precisely its “middle-ground” status.

The reason these 820,000 Chinese cling to their green cards isn’t some sort of “patriotic sentiment,” but a careful and pragmatic calculation about how to survive.

In their eyes, U.S. citizenship may look glamorous, but in reality it can be a “hot potato.”

Once they naturalize, their Chinese citizenship is automatically invalidated. Even going back to China to visit family becomes inconvenient — they must apply for visas and wait for approval like any foreigner, and spending more time with aging parents becomes difficult.

The financial side doesn’t look good either. U.S. inflation may stay around 3%, but rents can rise nearly 20%. Meanwhile, green-card holders who earn in dollars and spend in RMB are making a “killing.”

With stable prices in China’s top-tier cities, a green-card holder becomes a “dual-habitat animal”: earning a high salary as a Silicon Valley engineer, yet enjoying a high-quality life at low cost when they return to China.

Even more important is tax avoidance. U.S. citizens are taxed on worldwide income — if you collect rent in Shanghai or sell a property, Uncle Sam wants a cut.

Green cards, by contrast, only tax U.S.-source income, and overseas assets can save a big chunk of money. This is the true “have the best of both worlds” strategy.

Families with children calculate even more carefully. Green-card holders and citizens enjoy almost the same benefits when studying in the U.S., but the costs differ dramatically. International students at UCLA pay over 300,000 RMB per year in tuition, while green-card holders pay only around 90,000 — enough to “save a luxury car” over four years.

Admission chances are also vastly different. Green-card holders are admitted to Princeton at 2.3 times the rate of international students; at Cornell, 4.5 times the rate. Majors tied to “national security,” such as aerospace or AI, often only admit those with legal U.S. status.

Not wanting their children to become “second-class students” in the U.S., nor wanting to become “foreigners” on Chinese soil themselves, green cards naturally become the ideal solution.

Retirement is the final factor. Bringing elderly parents to the U.S. is difficult — language barriers, no social circle — leaving them stuck at home like they’re “serving immigration jail.”

Returning to China to retire is also tricky. With foreign citizenship, you must choose between being treated as a foreigner or having local household registration. Without Chinese nationality, medical insurance, social benefits, and other rights become complicated.

A lost green card can be reissued; citizenship can be reacquired. But once Chinese citizenship is given up, getting it back is extremely difficult. These 820,000 people understand this well — leaving themselves an exit strategy is simply wise.

And don’t assume these “masters of survival” who get green cards are all wealthy. The threshold isn’t as high as it seems.

Besides the US$800,000 EB-5 investment route, many rely on talent: STEM workers switch from H-1B to green card; industry elites apply through EB-1A Extraordinary Ability — meeting just three out of ten criteria is enough.

English teachers rely on publications and peer review; software engineers on patents and high salaries; embroidery artists on exhibitions and commercial value — all can qualify.

As long as you have a skill and present your achievements, you can join these 820,000 people who “benefit from both sides.” Keeping their roots in China while steadily taking advantage of opportunities across the ocean — this isn’t sentimentality, but survival wisdom taken to its fullest.

Source: Sohu.com — “Why do many U.S. green-card holders choose immigration without relocation?”

美國綠卡，他們拿了；美國國籍，他們卻拒了，82萬在美中國人里，超過一半明明符合入籍條件，卻寧愿繼續拿著那張綠卡，遲遲不肯“轉正”。對很多在美華人來說，綠卡最大的吸引力，恰恰是它的“中間地帶”。

82萬在美華人死守綠卡不肯入籍，可不是什么“愛國情懷”作祟，而是算了一筆精明的生存賬。

在他們眼里，美國國籍看著光鮮，實則可能是個“燙手山芋”。

一旦拿了，中國國籍自動失效，回國連自由探親都成問題，得像外國人一樣辦簽證、等審批，想多陪父母幾天門兒都沒有。

錢袋子更經不起細算，美國通脹雖穩在3%，但房租能漲近20%，可綠卡黨賺美元花人民幣，那叫一個“血賺”。

國內一線物價穩定，拿著綠卡能當“雙棲動物”，硅谷工程師的高薪照拿，回國還能享受低成本的高品質生活。

更關鍵的是避稅，美國公民全球征稅，你在上海收個房租、賣套房，美帝都要來分一杯羹。

綠卡只管美國境內收入，海外資產能省大筆稅錢，這才是真正的“兩頭通吃”。

有孩子的家庭更算得明白，綠卡和國籍在美讀書功能幾乎一樣，但成本天差地別，國際生讀UCLA一年學費30多萬，綠卡生只要9萬多，四年省出一輛豪車。

錄取率方面更是差距懸殊。普林斯頓綠卡生錄取率達國際生的2.3倍，康奈爾更是高達4.5倍，而且航空航天、AI這類“國家安全”專業，也僅向有身份者敞開大門。

既不愿孩子淪為“二等公民”，又不想自身成為中國土地上的“外國人”，那么綠卡無疑是當下最為理想的解決之道。

養老更是壓軸題，接父母來美國，語言不通、沒社交圈，老人只能“坐移民監”。

自己回國養老，外籍和本地戶口二選一，沒了中國籍，醫保難辦、社保權益處理全是坎兒。

綠卡遺失可補辦，國籍也可申請，然而中國國籍一朝失去，恢復難如登天，這82萬人他們明白，給自己預留一條后路，方為明智之舉。

那這群“生存大師”拿到綠卡別以為都是富豪，門檻沒那么高。

除了砸80萬美元的EB-5投資移民，更多人拼的是才華，理工科走H-1B轉綠卡，行業精英走EB-1A杰出人才通道，10條標準中3條就行。

英語老師靠論文、評審，程序員靠專利、高薪，刺繡達人靠辦展、商業價值，都能成。

只要你有一技之長，把成績擺上臺面，就能加入這82萬“兩邊占便宜”的行列，既不斷故土根，又穩接大洋彼岸紅利，這哪是情懷，分明是把“生存智慧”玩到極致的現實選擇。

信息來源：搜狐網——為什么很多美國綠卡申請人，選擇移民不移居？

SCMP: Reincarnation must follow Chinese laws and be endorsed by Beijing, Tibetan Buddhist leader Panchen Lama has said. This must be done “without any interference or control from organisations or individuals outside the country”, he added. 香港南華早報: 藏传佛教领袖班禅喇嘛表示，转世必须遵循中国法律并得到中央批准。他补充说，这一过程必须”不受境外任何组织或个人的干涉和操控”。

Video with English subtitles: Has American Hegemony Reached Its End? 影片有英文字幕: 美国霸权迎来终局？白宫最新战略报告解读，川普也没招了!

https://rumble.com/v72uorg-has-american-hegemony-reached-its-end.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8U3JUo7/

Interpreting the White House’s Latest Strategic Report—Even Trump Has No Answers!

This video provides an in-depth analysis of the newly released U.S. National Security Strategy report.

It examines the geopolitical shifts arising from America’s global strategic retrenchment and explores how these changes will impact the situation in Asia.

本期视频深度解读美国最新发布的国家安全战略报告。
分析美国在全球战略收缩背景下的地缘政治变局，以及这对亚洲局势的影响!

The New York Times recently put forward a concept called the “Strong Nation Paradox”…《紐約時報》近期提出了一個說法，叫做“強國悖論”…

According to their description, Chinese people seem to live in a kind of contradiction: the country shines on the world stage, but ordinary citizens feel a sort of “hidden despair” about the economy and their personal future, as if they have become sacrifices in China’s pursuit of catching up with the United States, and have no way to voice their concerns.

At first glance, this argument sounds somewhat plausible, as if it has uncovered some deeper truth. But upon closer examination, it’s not hard to see that it is merely the forced stitching together of partial phenomena and subjective imagination.

Is this so-called “paradox” truly something we experience firsthand, or is it a misunderstanding stemming from observers who cannot grasp China’s development logic?

Is there pressure in life today? Almost no one would deny that. The economy is in a period of transition, and many people inevitably feel the impact on their income and expectations. Changes in prices, slowing income growth—young people, whether in school or just entering the workforce, face fiercer competition than their parents’ generation. But does this pressure equal “despair”? These are two entirely different concepts.

If you have personally experienced rush-hour subways, seen office buildings with lights still on late at night, or walked into bustling parks and shopping malls on weekends, you would realize that this so-called “sense of despair” simply doesn’t hold up.

Young people are still rushing between projects, preparing for exams, working hard to improve their skills; older people are busy planning trips or exercising in public squares. This is clearly a resilience that seeks opportunity amid change, a vitality driven by the pursuit of a better life. How did this become “silent sacrifice” in the narratives of certain foreign media?

As for the accusation of having “no place to voice concerns,” this too contradicts reality. Western media are accustomed to their own street-protest style of expression, and therefore assume that Chinese citizens lack channels to speak out. But actual data and mechanisms tell a different story.

In 2025 alone, the nationwide 12345 government service hotline handled about 24 million requests, over 96% of which were properly addressed or responded to. And this doesn’t even include regular channels such as policy consultations, online message boards, and community councils.

Behind every negotiation of medical-insurance drug prices and every adjustment of people-benefiting policies, public input plays a role. Isn’t this pragmatic, problem-solving style of communication an even more effective way of being heard?

Looking deeper, framing national development and individual well-being as opposites is itself a false proposition. In recent years, the increased national dignity felt in international settings, the greater convenience of a Chinese passport, and stronger protection of citizens abroad are not only national “prestige,” but also solid support for businesses expanding overseas and for personal development.

At the same time, national progress has translated into real improvements in daily life: formerly remote villages now have roads, electricity, and internet; poverty-alleviation policies have raised the living standards of hundreds of millions of people; and the social safety net continues to grow stronger. All this is evidence that the fruits of development benefit ordinary people.

Of course, we do not shy away from the challenges we face. Pressures in healthcare, education, and housing still exist. People have anxieties and expectations about the future—and this precisely shows that what people pursue is no longer just “having something” but “having something good.” This rising demand that comes with development is fundamentally different from the notion of “despair.”

In the end, the “Strong Nation Paradox” looks more like a case of cognitive dissonance among certain observers who interpret China through predetermined frameworks. They cannot deny China’s achievements, yet they do not wish to acknowledge that behind them lies the collective effort and support of hundreds of millions of people. So they construct a narrative of “a strong state and suffering people” to make their worldview feel coherent.

But the real lived experience belongs to every person working hard on this land. China’s story has never been the pale tragedy depicted by some foreign media—rather, it is a vivid chapter written by countless ordinary people who face reality, believe in effort, and create the future with their own hands.

For the many Chinese who are striving for a better life, the strongest response may not be verbal rebuttals, but simply to stay grounded and continue walking their own path.

《紐約時報》近期提出了一個說法，叫做“強國悖論”…

按照他們的描述，中國人似乎生活在一種矛盾中：國家在國際上光彩奪目，但普通民眾卻對經濟和個人未來感到一種“隱秘的絕望”，彷彿成為國家追趕美國過程中的犧牲品，且找不到表達聲音的途徑。

這種說法初聽似乎有些道理，像是洞察到了某種深層的真相。但只要仔細推敲，就不難發現，這其實是將局部現象與主觀想象強行拼接的結果。

所謂的“悖論”，究竟是我們切身的體會，還是旁觀者因難以理解中國的發展邏輯而產生的誤解？

當前的生活有壓力嗎？這一點恐怕無人否認。經濟處於轉型期，許多人的收入和預期難免受到影響。物價變化、收入增長放緩，年輕人無論在校讀書還是初入職場，都面臨著比父輩更激烈的競爭。但這種壓力，是否就等於“絕望”？這完全是兩個不同的概念。

如果你曾親身經歷早晚高峰的地鐵，見過深夜依然亮着燈的寫字樓，或是走進周末熙熙攘攘的公園和商場，就會發現所謂的“絕望感”難以成立。

年輕人仍在為項目奔波、為考試備戰、為提升技能而努力；老年人則忙着規劃旅行、在廣場上鍛煉身體。這分明是一種在變化中尋找機會的韌性，是一種為了更好生活而拼搏的生命力。怎麼到了某些外媒的筆下，就變成了“無聲的犧牲”呢？

至於“無處發聲”的指責，更是與事實不符。西方媒體習慣於他們那種街頭喧嘩式的表達，便以為中國民眾缺乏發聲渠道。但實際的數據和機制告訴我們並非如此。

僅2025年，全國12345政務服務便民熱線就受理了約2400萬件訴求，其中超過96%得到了有效辦理或回應。這還不包括各種政策徵求意見、網絡留言板、社區議事會等常態化渠道。

每一次醫保藥品談判、每一項惠民政策的調整，背後往往都有公眾意見的推動。這種務實、注重解決問題的溝通方式，難道不是一種更有效的“發聲”嗎？

更進一步看，把國家發展與個人福祉對立起來，本身就是一個虛假的命題。這些年來，我們在國際場合感受到的國家尊嚴的提升、中國護照便利性的增加、公民海外安全的保障，不僅是國家的“面子”，更是企業出海、個人發展的堅實“裡子”。

與此同時，國家的進步也實實在在地轉化為日常生活的改善：曾經偏遠的鄉村通了公路、接了水電網絡，扶貧政策讓數以億計的人生活水平得到提高，社會保障網也在逐步織密。這一切，都是發展成果惠及普通人的證明。

當然，我們並不迴避當前面臨的挑戰。醫療、教育、住房等領域的壓力依然存在，人們對未來有焦慮、有期待，這恰恰說明大家追求的已不再是“有沒有”，而是“好不好”。這種伴隨着發展而產生的更高要求，與所謂的“絕望”有着本質區別。

說到底，“強國悖論”更像是一些觀察者用固有框架解讀中國時產生的認知失調。他們無法否認中國取得的成就，卻又不願承認這背後是億萬民眾的共同努力與支持，於是便構造出一套“國家強大、人民痛苦”的敘事來勉強自洽。

真正的生活體驗，終究屬於在這片土地上辛勤耕耘的每一個人。中國的故事，從來不是某些外媒筆下那種蒼白的悲情劇，而是無數普通人面對現實、相信奮鬥、用雙手創造未來的鮮活篇章。

對於廣大正為生活打拚的中國人而言，最有力的回應或許並非言語上的辯駁，而是腳踏實地，繼續走好自己的路。

Audio recording proof Japan is lying Video: On December 10, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun hosted a regular press conference. A reporter from NHK asked 音頻錄音證實日本在說謊影片有英文字幕: 12月10日，中國外交部發言人郭嘉昆主持例行記者會。日本放送協會（NHK）記者提問

https://rumble.com/v72u9mo-audio-recording-proof-japan-is-lying.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UcAGvU/

Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said today that the Japan Air Self-Defense Force has not recently used radar against Chinese carrier-based aircraft, and noted that due to the lack of specific information such as navigation notices, Japan was unable to obtain complete collision-avoidance information. What is the spokesperson’s comment?

Guo Jiakun stated that Japan previously claimed it had not received prior notification from the Chinese side, but is now admitting that it did receive information from China. Such self-contradictory statements clearly show that Japan first deliberately caused trouble and then spread rumors, making it the planner and perpetrator of this farce. We urge the Japanese side to face up to the real crux of current China-Japan tensions, seriously reflect and correct its mistakes, and honestly withdraw Prime Minister Takai’s erroneous remarks regarding Taiwan. 🇨🇳

日本防衛大臣小泉進次郎今日表示，日本航空自衛隊近期從未對中方艦載機使用雷達，並指出因缺乏航行通告等具體內容，未能獲取完整的避險信息。發言人對此有何評論？

郭嘉昆表示，日方此前聲稱事先沒有收到中方的通報，現在又承認事先得到了中方的信息，這種前後矛盾的說法充分證明，日本蓄意滋擾在先，造謠炒作在後，是這場鬧劇的策劃者、肇事方。我們要奉勸日方，要正視當前中日關係困難的癥結，認認真真反思糾錯，老老實實撤回高市首相涉臺錯誤言論!🇨🇳

Video: Was Mao Zedong senile in his old age? Why did he launch the Cultural Revolution? Why are Chinese people “hard to govern”? 毛澤東老年是老糊塗嗎？為什麼要發動文革？為什麼中國人「不好管」？

https://rumble.com/v72ty5y-was-mao-zedong-senile-in-his-old-age-why-did-he-launch-the-cultural-revolut.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UcMGDf/

In 1970, the Dongfanghong-1 satellite was launched. To this day, it still travels alone in orbit, much like the state of mind of an elderly man in that era.

Hello everyone. In this video, we’re not here to repeat textbook conclusions or make simple black-and-white judgments. I want to take you through 50 years of historical fog and re-examine China in the 1960s–70s from a brand-new perspective — the perspective of Dongfanghong-1.

When many people recall those ten years, all they think of is catastrophe. But the data tells us that it was also a decade in which China’s industry, national defense, and diplomacy made explosive progress: the Two Bombs and One Satellite project, restoration of the UN seat, hybrid rice, and even a rural healthcare system that was praised by the WHO…
Why did Mao Zedong, at 73 years old, willingly bear infamy both in life and after death, and still decide to unleash a “revolution” that shattered the very order he had built?

Was it really just a power struggle? Or did he, in his later years, sense a “future” that deeply frightened him?

When bureaucracy resurges, when class solidification becomes increasingly severe, perhaps we can better understand the despair and determination he felt at that time.

History must be viewed from a distance. This video, based on extensive historical documents and independent reflection, attempts to reconstruct a tragic charge launched in pursuit of ultimate human equality.

Chapter Overview

00:00 Dongfanghong-1: A lonely watcher in space
01:23 The intentionally ignored “report card”: Industrial and medical miracles
03:45 Costs and scars: Why do we only hear the elites’ cries?
05:12 The logical flaws of the “power struggle” theory: What did Mao truly fear?
08:30 A painful “vaccine”: Fighting the servility ingrained over millennia
10:55 The quiet dawn: The greatest legacy left by that revolution
13:10 Cutting through the fog: The final echoes of history

1970年，東方紅一號衛星升空，至今它仍在軌道上孤獨地運行，就像那個時代一位老人晚年的心境。

大家好。本期影片我們不談教科書上的定論，也不做簡單的黑白評判。我想帶大家穿透50年的歷史迷霧，從一個全新的視角——「東方紅一號」的視角，去重新審視20世紀60–70年代的中國。

很多人提起那十年，想到的只有浩劫。但數據告訴我們，那也是中國工業、國防、外交突飛猛進的十年：兩彈一星、恢復聯合國席位、雜交水稻、甚至被世衛組織稱讚的農村醫療體系…
為什麼毛澤東在73歲高齡，寧願背負身前身後的罵名，也要發動一場震碎自己親手建立秩序的「革命」？

這真的僅僅是權力鬥爭嗎？
還是他在晚年看到了某些讓他感到恐懼的「未來」？

當官僚主義重新抬頭，當階級固化日益嚴重，也許我們能更讀懂他當年的絕望與決絕。

歷史需要拉開距離看。本影片基於大量歷史文獻與獨立思考，試圖還原一個為了人類終極平等而進行的悲壯衝鋒。

【章節速覽】
00:00 東方紅一號：太空中孤獨的守望者
01:23 被刻意忽視的「成績單」：工業與醫療奇蹟
03:45 代價與傷痕：為什麼我們只聽到了菁英的哭聲？
05:12 權力鬥爭論的邏輯漏洞：毛澤東真正恐懼的是什麼？
08:30 這一針痛苦的「疫苗」：對抗幾千年的奴性
10:55 這裡的黎明靜悄悄：那場革命留下的最大遺產
13:10 穿透迷霧：歷史的終極回響

SCMP: China planning is 10 years ahead of US! 《南華早報》消息：中國前瞻布局領先美國十年!

China has activated what may be the world’s largest distributed AI computing pool alongside a high-speed data network that has been planned for more than a decade, according to an official state newspaper.

China’s best computing centres are sparsely distributed across the country. With this technology they could work seamlessly together to fast-track the development of the most powerful AI models and other cutting-edge technology.

官方報紙報道，中國已啟動可能是全球規模最大的分散式人工智慧運算池，並配套建設了籌劃逾十年的高速資料傳輸網路。全國各地分散佈局的頂尖運算中心，將透過此技術實現無縫協作，加速推進最先進人工智慧模型及其他尖端科技的研發進程。

Video with English subtitles: Japan’s Yasukuni Shrine housing WWII Class A War Criminals worship by all Japanese Prime Ministers glorifying their horrific acts. 影片有英文字幕: 日本靖國神社供奉二戰甲級戰犯，歷任日本首相都曾在此祭拜，美化他們的恐怖罪行.
https://rumble.com/v72tpm8-japans-yasukuni-shrine-housing-wwii-class-a-war-criminals-worship-by-japane.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UvatFh/