Business Blog

From the 1970s to the 1990s, the University of Hawaii had over a thousand students from Hong Kong. After 1998, the situation changed, with over a thousand students from mainland China studying in Hawaii. 1970-1990 年代夏威大學有一千多名香港學生，1998年後變天，中國大陸學生在夏威夷有一千多人.

Back in the 1970s to 1990s, very few university students from mainland China were wealthy, unless they were the children of corrupt officials. However, the children of corrupt officials would not study at the University of Hawaii, so at that time, our chamber of commerce did its best to support and assist those students. After 1998, most of the students from China became quite wealthy. Seeing the East rise and the West decline has been deeply感慨. Back then, when we organized singing competitions, students from mainland China always took the top three spots. Some Taiwan-organized groups were extremely unhappy about this. Since 2018, the rise of the East and the decline of the West have become even more apparent. I told my children and grandchildren, especially my three grandchildren under the age of six, and their father, my son, that the United States will certainly collapse within thirty years. Back then, we left China and Hong Kong in search of a better life. Today, in order to survive, we must consider leaving the United States, especially for those of us who are nearing retirement. We really need to make plans for ourselves. Our children and grandchildren will have their own fortunes. If they choose to ignore the risks, like the Titanic, I tell them they deserve it. But as parents and grandparents, it is our responsibility to warn them. If they don’t listen, and in the future, when I ascend to heaven and see them suffering in the United States, I won’t feel the slightest bit sorry for them—they will have brought it upon themselves!

想當年1970-1990來自中國大陸的大學生極少是有錢的，除非是貪官子女，但貪官子女不會到夏威夷大學讀書，所以那個時候的學生，我們商會盡量幫助支持. 1998年後來自中國的大學生，大部分變得很人錢。眼看東升西降真的有很大的感觸. 當年我們弄歌唱比賽都是來自中國的大學生拿頭三名. 有些台灣主辨的團體極不開心。自2018東升西降更明顯，我對我的兒孫說：尤其是我的三個六歲下的孫子，我告訴他的爸爸即是我的兒子，美國在三十年內一定玩完，當年我們離開中國和香港尋找好生活，今天我們為了活著必須考慮離開美國，尤其是我們一班快退休的人士. 真的要為自己作好打算，兒孫自有兒孫福，如果他們要像 Titanic 不信風險，我告訴他們活該，但做父母爺爺是有責任告訴他們. 他們不聽話，將來我上了天國看到他們在美國受苦，到時我是不會有一點對不起他們的感覺，是他們活該!

Taiwan’s CTi News video: A scene from the Hong Kong Hung Fook Court fire brought tears to netizens’ eyes; firefighters repeatedly took deep breaths, fighting back tears as they rescued people… Survivors: They truly risked their lives to save us! 台灣中天新聞視頻有英文字幕: 香港宏福苑大火”這一幕”惹哭網友 消防員多次深呼吸”強忍淚水”救人…生還者:他們真的用命在救我們!
https://rumble.com/v72e7li-a-scene-from-the-hong-kong-hung-fook-court-fire-brought-tears-to-netizens-e.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UPqnQL/

Video: Why Billionaires Are Selling Everything Right Now (They See What You Don’t) Just like they did in 2007 & 2008 leading to World Financial Crisis 影片標題：為何億萬富豪正在拋售一切（他們看到了你未見的徵兆）- 正如他們在2007至2008年金融危機前的操作

https://rumble.com/v72e2oo-billionaires-are-selling-everything-now-they-see-what-you-dont-just-like-th.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UPaw6f/

Jeff Bezos: Sold $13 billion in Amazon stock.
Mark Zuckerberg: Sold billions in Meta shares.
Jamie Dimon: Sold stock for the FIRST TIME EVER as JPMorgan CEO.
Larry Ellison: Sold $3 billion in Oracle.
The Walton Family: Sold $2 billion in Walmart.
Nvidia Insiders: Sold $700 million while stock hit all-time highs.

This isn’t diversification. This isn’t tax planning. This is an EXODUS.

THE LARGEST COORDINATED INSIDER SELLING SINCE 2007.

And we all know what happened in 2008.

THE NUMBERS:

Total Insider Selling (2024): $464 BILLION
Second-highest year on record
Highest was 2007: $650 billion
2008: Financial crisis, S&P fell 57%

Sell-to-Buy Ratio: 9:1
Normal ratio: 3:1 (healthy market)
2024 ratio: 9:1 (insiders selling $9 for every $1 bought)
Some months: 12:1 (extreme panic selling)
Most extreme ratio in recorded history

THIS IS NOT NORMAL DIVERSIFICATION. THIS IS SYSTEMATIC EXIT.

WHO’S SELLING (THE EVIDENCE):

JEFF BEZOS – $13 BILLION:
February 2024: Filed to sell 50M shares ($8.5B)
July 2024: Filed to sell 25M more shares ($4B+)
Total 2024: Over $13 billion in Amazon stock
Official reason: “Moved to Florida for tax benefits”
Real reason: Selling at all-time highs before crash

Why this matters:
Bezos founded Amazon, knows it better than anyone
Worth $200B+, doesn’t need the money
Could have moved to Florida anytime in 25 years
Chose to sell $13B in 2024 specifically
Timing = market at peak

MARK ZUCKERBERG – BILLIONS:
Sold hundreds of millions of Meta shares in 2024
Meta stock hit $500+ (all-time highs)
Largest sales ever as % of holdings
Official reason: “Funding Chan Zuckerberg Initiative”
Real reason: Selling at peak before crash

Why this matters:
Zuckerberg created Meta, controls it through super-voting shares
Worth $180B+, could fund philanthropy anytime
Chose 2024 when stock hit records
That’s market timing, not philanthropy

JAMIE DIMON – $150 MILLION (MOST IMPORTANT SIGNAL):
CEO of JPMorgan Chase since 2005 (19 years)
NEVER sold a single share in 19 years
Preached long-term holding to investors
2024: Sold 1M shares ($150M) FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER
Official reason: “Estate planning and diversification”

Why this is THE signal:
19 years, zero sales, then suddenly sells
Could have done “estate planning” anytime
Chose 2024 at market all-time highs
As CEO of largest US bank, sees data nobody else does:
Loan defaults rising
Commercial real estate collapsing
Consumer credit maxing out
This isn’t estate planning, this is the ultimate insider warning

傑夫·貝佐斯：拋售130億美元亞馬遜股票
馬克·扎克伯格：拋售數十億美元Meta持股
傑米·戴蒙：擔任摩根大通CEO以來首度拋股
拉里·埃里森：拋售30億美元甲骨文股票
沃爾頓家族：拋售20億美元沃爾瑪股份
英偉達內部人士：趁股價創新高拋售7億美元

這不是資產分散配置，也不是稅務規劃
而是一場資本大遷徙

自2007年以來最大規模的內部人士協同拋售
而我們都見證過2008年的結局

關鍵數據：
2024年內部人士總拋售額：4640億美元
創歷史第二高紀錄
最高紀錄是2007年：6500億美元
2008年：金融危機爆發，標普500指數暴跌57%

售買比率達9:1
正常市場比率為3:1
2024年比率意味著每買入1美元即拋售9美元
部分月份甚至達到12:1（極度恐慌性拋售）
創有史以來最極端紀錄

這絕非常態資產配置，而是系統性撤離

拋售者實證分析：

傑夫·貝佐斯—130億美元：
2024年2月：申請拋售5000萬股（85億美元）
2024年7月：再申請拋售2500萬股（逾40億美元）
官方說詞：「為佛州稅務優惠搬遷」
實情：在市場崩盤前於歷史高點出脫
關鍵意義：
創辦人最洞悉企業真實價值
身價逾2000億無資金需求
25年間隨時可遷居佛州
獨選2024年集中拋售
時機指向市場頂點

馬克·扎克伯格—數十億美元：
2024年拋售數億股Meta持股
股價突破500美元歷史高點
持股比例降幅創個人紀錄
官方說詞：「資助陳-扎克伯格計劃」
實情：在峰值提前套現
關鍵意義：
透過超級投票權絕對控股
身價1800億卻選在股價巔峰套現
實為市場時機操作而非公益需求

傑米·戴蒙—1.5億美元（最關鍵信號）：
執掌摩根大通19年從未拋股
始終向投資者倡導長期持有
2024年破天荒出售100萬股
官方說詞：「遺產規劃與資產分散」
終極警訊解讀：
19年零拋售後突襲出脫
遺產規劃本可隨時進行
獨選市場巔峰時出手
作為全美最大銀行CEO掌握獨家數據：
違約率攀升
商業地產崩潰
消費者信貸觸頂
這非遺產規劃，而是終極內部預警

Japan has, throughout its history, often shown fear toward great powers while adopting a hardline stance toward weaker parties. 日本在歷史上曾多次展現出對強權的畏懼與對弱方的強硬態度:

https://rumble.com/v72by5u-japan-only-kowtow-to-powerful-nation.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UUPTAW/

例如，美國在二戰末期投下原子彈，以及蘇聯在戰後將關東軍俘虜送往西伯利亞勞動改造，這些事件都深刻影響了日本的戰後國家心理.

相較之下，中國一向自我定位為禮儀之邦，倡導以合作與和平方式處理國際關係，包括「人類命運共同體」的理念。然而，部分日本政界與輿論往往將中國的克制視為軟弱，忽略了善意背後的原則與力量.

在當前複雜的國際局勢中，如果和平與克制被誤讀為可被任意挑釁，反而可能導致區域局勢緊張。因此，中國在堅持和平理念的同時，也需要展現讓外界真正理解的決心、底線與實力，以免被誤判.

For example, the United States’ dropping of atomic bombs at the end of World War II and the Soviet Union’s postwar transfer of captured Kwantung Army soldiers to labor camps in Siberia profoundly shaped Japan’s postwar national psyche.

In contrast, China has long positioned itself as a nation of propriety, advocating cooperation and peaceful approaches to international relations, including the concept of a “community with a shared future for mankind.” However, some sectors of Japanese politics and public opinion often view China’s restraint as weakness, overlooking the principles and strength behind this goodwill.

In today’s complex international environment, if peace and restraint are misinterpreted as an invitation for provocation, regional tensions may worsen. Therefore, while China remains committed to peaceful principles, it also needs to demonstrate clear resolve, firm boundaries, and real capability so that it is not misjudged by others.

The “enemy state clauses” in the UN Charter still exist today and have not been formally removed. 联合国宪章中的“敌国条款”目前仍然存在，并未被正式刪除.

Below is a detailed explanation of the UN’s “enemy state clauses”:

What are the “enemy state clauses”?

The “enemy state clauses” mainly refer to the following two articles in the UN Charter:
• Article 53: It stipulates that when the Security Council undertakes enforcement measures under regional arrangements or through regional agencies, no enforcement action may be taken without the authorization of the Security Council. However, there is one exception:
“…this does not apply to actions taken or authorized as a result of World War II against any enemy state of any signatory to this Charter…”
• Article 107:
“Nothing in this Charter shall invalidate or preclude action, in relation to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory to the present Charter, taken or authorized as a result of that war by the Governments having responsibility for such action.”

In simple terms, these clauses authorize the Allied powers that fought against the Axis powers (Germany, Japan, Italy, etc.) during World War II—such as the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and China—to take action, individually or jointly, against these “enemy states” without needing approval from the UN Security Council.

联合国宪章中的“敌国条款”目前仍然存在，并未被正式刪除.

以下是有關聯合國「敵國條款」的詳細說明：

什麼是「敵國條款」？

「敵國條款」主要指《聯合國憲章》中的以下兩個條文：

· 第53條：規定安全理事會在執行區域辦法或由區域機關所採取之執行行動時，如無安全理事會之授權，不得依此採取任何執行行動。但有一項例外：「……對於本憲章任何簽字國之敵國在第二次世界大戰中本憲章任何簽字國之敵國所採取或受權執行之行動，…不在此限。」
· 第107條：「本憲章並不取消或禁止負有行動責任之政府對於在第二次世界大戰中本憲章任何簽字國之敵國因該次戰爭而採取或授權執行之行動。」

簡單來說，這些條款授權在二戰中與軸心國（德國、日本、義大利等）作戰的同盟國（如美國、蘇聯、英國、中國等），可以單獨或聯合對這些「敵國」採取行動，而無需經過聯合國安理會的批准。

Former Singapore UN Ambassador Kishore Mahbubani video with Chinese Subtitles: Why America Plays Chess, But China Plays Wei Qi (The 100-Year Strategy). While most watch the game, how many understand the game? 新加坡前聯合國大使馬凱碩視頻有中文字幕: 為何美國下象棋，而中國下圍棋（百年戰略）。多數人觀棋，然識局者幾何？

https://rumble.com/v72bnn2-why-america-plays-chess-but-china-plays-wei-qi.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UU2kcs/

♟️ Why America Plays Chess, But China Plays Wei Qi

In this masterclass on global strategy, Kishore Mahbubani reveals the fundamental misunderstanding driving the world’s most important rivalry.

While America plays Chess—seeking decisive victories, regime change, and checkmate—China plays Wei Qi (Go), pursuing patience, encirclement, and quiet accumulation of power.

Through brilliant storytelling and decades of diplomatic insight, Mahbubani dissects the contrasting worldviews that define Washington and Beijing—and shows how America’s Cold War mindset could lead it into a strategic trap it doesn’t yet see.

In this talk, you’ll learn:
🧠 Why America’s “containment” strategy cannot work on a trading superpower
🌏 How China’s Wei Qi strategy uses trade, infrastructure, and patience to reshape the world
💼 The MPH Formula — Meritocracy, Pragmatism, and Honesty — behind China’s rise
🚫 Why forcing nations to “choose sides” is a losing move in a multipolar world
🇺🇸 How America can still win—by learning the new rules of the game

Mahbubani’s message is urgent but hopeful:

China seeks rejuvenation, not conquest.

If America learns to play the long game, both civilizations can thrive.

But if it keeps playing Chess in a Wei Qi world, everyone loses.

♟️ 為何美國下象棋，而中國下圍棋

在這場全球戰略大師課中，馬凱碩揭示了驅動世界最重要競爭的根本誤解。

美國猶如下象棋——追求決勝性勝利、政權更迭與將軍絕殺；中國卻似下圍棋，講究耐心周旋、合圍之勢與靜默積累實力。

憑藉精妙敘事與數十年外交洞察，馬凱碩剖析了華盛頓與北京截然不同的世界觀，並展現美國的冷戰思維如何將其拖入自身尚未察覺的戰略陷阱。

本講座將揭示：
🧠 為何美國的「圍堵」戰略對貿易超級大國注定失效
🌏 中國如何以圍棋思維運用貿易、基建與耐心重塑世界格局
💼 支撐中國崛起的MPH法則——任人唯賢、實事求是、誠信為本
🚫 在多極化世界中強迫各國「選邊站」為何是步敗棋
🇺🇸 美國如何通過掌握新博弈規則仍可贏得優勢

馬凱碩的警示發人深省卻飽含希望：

中國追求的是民族復興，而非征伐稱霸。

若美國學會謀篇布局，兩大文明皆可繁榮共盛。

然若繼續在圍棋局中行象棋路，終將滿盤皆輸。

Video with Chinese subtitles: China Was Right About the Internet. It was never neutral! Africa & Global South prefer Chinese companies over the US! 帶有中文字幕的影片：中國對互聯網的立場是正確的。網絡從來就不是中立的! 非洲和全球南方國家更青睞中國公司而非美國公司!

https://rumble.com/v72bike-china-was-right-about-the-internet.-it-was-never-neutral.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UDmMaY/

Was China right about the internet? We’re joined by Mauro Ramos Pintos, Brazil de Fato’s correspondent in China, and Jonis Ghedi Alasow, Executive Director of Pan Africanism Today. They share groundbreaking insights into China’s data sovereignty strategy and why the internet was never neutral. We also discuss why Meta never entered China, and what the Global South can learn about digital independence.

中國對互聯網的立場是否正確？我們邀請了巴西《事實報》駐華記者毛羅·拉莫斯·平托斯，以及當代泛非主義協會執行理事喬尼斯·蓋迪·阿拉索。他們將分享對中國數據主權戰略的突破性見解，並闡釋網絡為何從未保持中立。我們還將探討為何Meta始終未能進入中國市場，以及全球南方國家能從中汲取哪些數字獨立經驗。

American logistic expert reports from China with Chinese subtitles video: That didn’t take long: Trump’s trade deals already blowing up industries and governments in Asia 美國物流在中國報導有中文字幕視訊: 這並未耗費太長時間：特朗普的貿易協議已開始衝擊亞洲各行業與政府

https://rumble.com/v72bfvi-that-didnt-take-long-trumps-trade-deals-already-blowing-up-industries-and-g.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8UDXeLD/

Opposition parties in Malaysia and Thailand are outraged at the one-sided trade deals their respective PM’s signed with the Trump Administration.

The agreements give Washington priority over mining industry interests, and contain “poison pill” provisions that allow the US to cancel them in case of separate trade deals with third countries.

The language of the deal with Malaysia will likely blow up plans for Chinese companies to invest billions, to develop Malaysia’s rare earth metals industries. The agreement gives Washington rights to rare earth metals in Malaysia, who is in advanced talks with China for the equipment and engineers to do the mining and refining.

Closing scene, Kunming, Yunnan

美國物流在中國報導有中文字幕視訊: 這並未耗費太長時間：特朗普的貿易協議已開始衝擊亞洲各行業與政府

馬來西亞與泰國的反對黨派對其總理與特朗普政府簽署的單邊貿易協議表示強烈憤慨。這些協議賦予華盛頓在礦業利益上的優先權，並包含「毒丸條款」——若相關國家與第三方簽署獨立貿易協議，美國有權單方面終止合作。

與馬來西亞的協議條款很可能將摧毀中國企業投資數十億美元開發馬來西亞稀土產業的計劃。該協議將馬來西亞的稀土權益授予華盛頓，而馬來西亞此前已與中國就礦產開採和精煉設備與人才引進開展深入談判。

鏡頭轉向雲南昆明，故事在此暫告段落。

CGTN Viewers discretion video with Chinese subtitles: Japan’s heavy blood debt: Unhealed wounds across Asia 中國國際電視台觀眾謹慎觀看（含中文字幕）視頻: 日本沉重的血債：亞洲未癒的傷痕

https://rumble.com/v72bezk-cgtn-viewers-discretion-video-japans-heavy-blood-debt-unhealed-wounds-acros.html

Japan’s heavy blood debt across Asia during World War Two remains an unhealed wound. Fresh alarm is rising as Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s extremely erroneous and hostile remarks on China fuel concerns that she is steering Japan toward reviving its notorious militarist past.

Takaichi recently claimed that the Chinese mainland’s “use of force on Taiwan” could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, implying the possibility of Japan’s armed intervention in the Taiwan Strait. She has refused to retract these harmful remarks so far, despite China’s solemn representations and strong protests, and criticism from former Japanese leaders and prominent public figures.

Her remarks evoke memories of Japan’s imperialist aggressions and reveal the country’s expanding military ambitions. Historically, Japan launched multiple aggressions against many countries under the pretext of addressing so-called survival crises, which created real survival crises across Asia and inflicted immense suffering on countless civilians.

This year marks the 80th anniversary of victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War. Many are urging Japan to confront its wartime atrocities with sincerity. Japanese authorities should truly repent past militarist invasions, draw lessons from history, and commit to peaceful development, rather than seeking incendiary and deceptive excuses for military buildup.

二戰期間日本在亞洲欠下的沉重血債至今仍是未癒合的創傷。隨著日本首相高市早苗對中國發表極端謬誤的敵對言論，引發新的警訊——人們擔憂她正引導日本復甦其臭名昭著的軍國主義歷史。

高市近期妄稱中國大陸「對台動武」可能構成日本的「生存危機事態」，暗示日本可能對台海進行武裝干預。儘管中方提出嚴正交涉和強烈抗議，並遭到日本前政要及社會名流的批評，她至今拒絕收回這些危害性言論。

其言論喚起了對日本帝國主義侵略的歷史記憶，暴露出該國日益膨脹的軍事野心。歷史上日本曾多次以所謂「生存危機」為藉口對多國發動侵略，給亞洲各國帶來真正的生存危機，使無數平民遭受深重苦難。

今年正值中國人民抗日戰爭暨世界反法西斯戰爭勝利80週年。國際社會普遍敦促日本真誠正視其戰爭罪行。日本當局應真正反省過往軍國主義侵略歷史，汲取歷史教訓，堅持和平發展道路，而非為擴軍備戰尋找煽動性、欺騙性的藉口。

Video: She’s Gone Mad! Takaichi Sanae Isn’t Preparing for War. She’s Using China as a Threat to Seize Power 她瘋了！高市早苗不是在準備開戰，而是利用「中國威脅」奪權！

Japanese Defense Minister Takaichi Sanae has deployed missiles on Yonaguni Island, just 110 kilometers from Taiwan. What appears to be military provocation is actually a carefully orchestrated political gambit.

She simultaneously antagonizes China, Russia, and South Korea while signing a $550 billion investment deal with the United States. What shocking conspiracy lies behind this?

This video provides in-depth analysis of:
✓ Takaichi’s real motive—not military but a political power grab
✓ How she uses external pressure to challenge Japan’s traditional establishment
✓ Why this “Gekokujo” coup is doomed to fail
✓ The real chess game in the China-US-Japan triangle
✓ How Japan’s Heisei-era shut-ins became her political base

This isn’t just military deployment—it’s a coup against Japan’s political establishment. She wants to use China’s opposition to consolidate her own power, but China has already seen through her scheme.

A female politician’s personal ambition, disguised as military adventurism—where will it ultimately drag Japan?

If you care about East Asian geopolitics, China-Japan relations, or international strategy, you can’t miss this analysis.

日本防衛大臣高市早苗在距離台灣僅110公里的與那國島部署飛彈。看似是軍事挑釁，實際上卻是一場精心策劃的政治布局。

她一邊同時挑釁中國、俄羅斯與南韓，另一邊又與美國簽下5500億美元的投資協議。這背後到底隱藏著什麼驚人的陰謀？

本影片深入解析：
✓ 高市真正的動機——不是軍事，而是政治奪權
✓ 她如何利用外部壓力挑戰日本傳統政治建制
✓ 為何這場「下克上」政變註定失敗
✓ 中美日三方真正的博弈棋局
✓ 日本平成時代「家裡蹲」如何成為她的政治基本盤

這不只是一場軍事部署——而是對日本政治建制的政變。她想利用中國的反對來鞏固自己的權力，但中國早已看穿她的布局。

一位女政治家把個人野心偽裝成軍事冒進——最終將把日本拖向何方？

如果你關心東亞地緣政治、中日關係或國際戰略，你絕對不能錯過這份分析。

https://rumble.com/v72b756-takaichi-sanae-isnt-preparing-for-war.-shes-using-china-as-a-threat-to-seiz.html