Business Blog

Video with Chinese subtitles: US false flags activity against Venezuela 影片有中文字幕: 美國針對委內瑞拉的偽旗行動

https://youtu.be/5N9p03rGlTE?si=iNTKZp1eXV6vBaxZ
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8SmK6LG/
https://rumble.com/v6z4zvo-us-false-flags-activity-against-venezuela.html

Video with Chinese subtitles: China Just Upgraded Its Flagship J-20 Fighter. And It’s Deadlier Than You Think 影片有中文字幕: 中國剛升級其旗艦殲-20戰鬥機。它比你想像的更致命

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8SmCaJR/
https://youtu.be/SrkfmZYr7iE?si=WBE-P1g3t2FyDfy9
https://rumble.com/v6z4krg-china-just-upgraded-its-flagship-j-20-fighter.-and-its-deadlier-than-you-th.html

The sky has always been the ultimate battlefield of power. Whoever controls the skies, controls the war. For decades, the United States reigned supreme with its stealth jets, the F-22 Raptor, the F-35 Lightning II, symbols of American dominance. But in 2017, a new dragon took flight. China’s J-20 Mighty Dragon, its first fifth-generation stealth fighter, entered service. And with it, the balance of air power began to tilt.

Now, eight years later, that dragon hasn’t just survived, it has evolved. Upgraded. Multiplied. And it has proven, beyond a shadow of doubt, that China is no longer chasing America’s shadow, it’s rewriting the future of air combat.

Today we’ll uncover how China’s J-20 became a nightmare for U.S. air power, why its successor, the J-35 stealth fighter, is even more dangerous, and how the next-gen fighter prototypes being whispered about could forever change the skies.

天空一直是權力的終極戰場。誰控制了天空，誰就控制了戰爭。幾十年來，美國憑藉其隱形戰機——F-22「猛禽」戰鬥機和F-35「閃電II」戰鬥機——稱霸世界，這些戰機象徵美國的霸主地位。但在2017年，一條新的龍起飛。中國首款第五代隱形戰鬥機殲-20「威龍」正式服役。隨之而來的是空中力量的平衡開始傾斜。

如今，八年過去了，這條龍不僅倖存了下來，而且不斷進化、升級、繁殖。它毫無疑問地證明，中國不再追逐美國的影子，而是正在改寫空戰的未來。

今天，我們將揭示中國的殲-20如何成為美國空中力量的噩夢，為什麼它的繼任者殲-35隱形戰鬥機更加危險，以及人們所談論的下一代戰鬥機原型如何永遠改變天空.

Video: Dong Jun speech / SCMP: China’s defence chief slams Western ‘bullying’, rallies regional allies! China’s defence minister summoned took aim at Western nations during a security conference, urging nations to stand up against “bullying” and describing military alliances as groups with “selfish interests”. 南華早報：中國國防部長抨擊西方“欺凌”，中國國防部長被邀請在安全會議上抨擊西方國家，敦促各國抵制“欺凌”，並稱以美國為首的軍事聯盟是“自私自利”的團體.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8Smm535/
https://youtu.be/Ypp9BePl4yQ?si=j-zqkNN9piltaZ-k
https://rumble.com/v6z4io4-chinas-defence-chief-slams-western-bullying-rallies-regional-allies.html
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3325991/chinas-defence-minister-warns-against-western-bullying-rallies-regional-allies?

SCMP: Huawei bypasses Nvidia AI chips in computing breakthrough for China! Huawei Technologies unveiled hardware that it could deliver world-class computing power without using Nvidia’s advanced chips providing a boost to the country’s self-reliance in AI computing 《南華早報》：華為超越英偉達，協助中國人工智慧運算取得突破! 華為科技公司推出的硬體無需使用 Nvidia 的先進晶片即可提供世界一流的運算能力，為中國在人工智慧運算領域的自主發展提供了助力
https://www.scmp.com/tech/tech-war/article/3325942/tech-war-huawei-bypasses-nvidia-ai-chips-computing-breakthrough-china?

Video: China’s Breakthrough with Non-Nuclear MgH2 Bomb 中國在非核氫化鎂炸彈取得突破

The China MgH2 breakthrough in April 2025 stunned the world—testing a non-nuclear magnesium hydride (MgH2) bomb that generated thermal power 15 times greater than TNT. Beyond defense, this MgH2 technology is a revolutionary step in clean energy storage, hydrogen fuel technology, and advanced material science. With industrial-scale MgH2 plants producing hundreds of thousands of tons per year, China is driving both defense industry innovation and the green hydrogen economy. In this video, we explore how the China MgH2 breakthrough reshapes energy, infrastructure, and global technology—from precision weapons to renewable energy systems—making MgH2 the material that could define the future.

2025年4月，中國在氫化鎂（MgH2）技術上的突破震驚了全世界——它試驗了一枚非核氫化鎂（MgH2）炸彈，產生的熱能是TNT炸藥的15倍。除了國防領域，這項MgH2技術在清潔能源儲存、氫燃料技術和先進材料科學領域也邁出了革命性的一步。中國擁有每年數十萬噸的工業規模MgH2工廠，正在推動國防工業創新和綠色氫能經濟的發展。在本影片中，我們將探討中國MgH2技術的突破如何重塑能源、基礎設施和全球技術-從精確武器到再生能源系統-並使MgH2成為可能定義未來的材料.

Of course. Here is a detailed explanation of the topic, addressing the claim, the science behind it, and the broader context.

China’s Reported Breakthrough with Non-Nuclear MgH2 Bomb

The topic of a “Non-Nuclear MgH2 Bomb” (Magnesium Hydride Bomb) attributed to China refers to a significant and controversial claim in the realm of advanced weaponry, specifically in the category of Enhanced Explosives or Thermobaric Weapons.

It is crucial to state from the outset: There is no independently verified, publicly available evidence from official Chinese military sources confirming the development or deployment of such a specific weapon. The information primarily stems from a single source and has been discussed in military analysis circles, but it remains unconfirmed.

However, the concept is based on sound scientific principles and aligns with global research into next-generation explosives. Here’s a breakdown:

1. The Claim and Its Source

The claim gained prominence in 2021 following a report by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), which cited a research paper from the Chinese journal Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics. The paper, authored by scientists from the China’s National University of Defense Technology, described a test of a powerful bomb that used a fuel-air explosive (FAE) mechanism without a nuclear warhead.

The key claim was that the bomb’s blast was so powerful it could be mistaken for a nuclear detonation, generating a shockwave and overpressure comparable to a tactical nuke, but without the residual radiation. The bomb was said to use nanoparticles of magnesium hydride (MgH2) as its key energetic material.

2. The Science Behind the MgH2 Bomb

The technology is an advanced evolution of Thermobaric Weapons (also known as vacuum bombs or fuel-air explosives).

· Standard Thermobaric Weapon: A typical FAE bomb disperses a fine cloud of flammable fuel (e.g., ethylene oxide) into the air. A second charge then ignites this cloud, creating a massive fireball and a prolonged, high-pressure shockwave. This shockwave sucks the oxygen out of enclosed spaces (like bunkers or tunnels) and causes extreme overpressure that can destroy structures and internal organs.
· The Magnesium Hydride (MgH2) Advancement:
· High Energy Density: Magnesium is a highly energetic metal. When combined with hydrogen to form magnesium hydride, it stores a tremendous amount of potential energy in a relatively small volume.
· Nanoparticles: By engineering the MgH2 into nanoparticles, scientists drastically increase its surface area. This allows it to disperse more effectively as an aerosol and react with oxygen in the air far more rapidly and completely than conventional fuels or larger metal particles. This leads to a much more efficient and powerful explosion.
· Two-Stage Reaction: The explosion is believed to involve two stages. First, the heat decomposes the MgH2 into magnesium metal and hydrogen gas. Then, both the ultrafine magnesium powder and the hydrogen gas ignite simultaneously in a massive conflagration with surrounding oxygen. Hydrogen has the fastest burning velocity of any gas, contributing to a incredibly rapid and devastating release of energy.

3. Why is it Considered a “Breakthrough”?

If the reports are accurate, such a weapon would represent a major leap forward for several reasons:

· Non-Nuclear Deterrence: It would provide a strategic option with a yield approaching that of low-yield tactical nuclear weapons, but without crossing the nuclear threshold. This is sometimes called a “strategic conventional weapon.”
· Massive Destructive Power: The combination of extreme overpressure and sustained high temperatures would be exceptionally effective against a wide range of targets, including:
· Hardened structures (command bunkers, mountain tunnels)
· Soft targets (airfields, naval ports, troop concentrations)
· Complex urban environments
· Psychological Impact: The visual and destructive characteristics of such a large thermobaric explosion could have a profound psychological impact, similar to that intended by nuclear weapons but without the permanent radiological contamination.

4. Strategic Implications and Skepticism

· Implications: The development of such weapons could alter regional and strategic balances. It could provide a conventional means to achieve objectives previously only possible with nuclear weapons, potentially changing calculus in scenarios like Taiwan or South China Sea contingencies.
· Healthy Skepticism: Many experts urge caution. While the science is plausible, the specific yield claims are extraordinary.
· Verification: The test described was likely a small-scale proof-of-concept. Scaling this up to a weaponized bomb with a multi-kiloton yield involves immense engineering challenges.
· Secrecy: China’s military research is highly secretive. The publication of the paper could be a signal of capability (a form of deterrence) or simply a report on early-stage research that may never be weaponized.
· Context: The paper itself is a scientific study, not an official weapons procurement announcement.

Conclusion

The “Non-Nuclear MgH2 Bomb” is best understood as a reported and potential technological breakthrough based on credible scientific research published by Chinese defense scientists. While not officially confirmed as a deployed weapon, it highlights China’s significant investment in advanced conventional weapons designed to close the gap with traditional nuclear powers.

It represents the cutting edge of thermobaric weapon technology, leveraging nanotechnology and material science to create explosives of unprecedented power. Whether the specific claims of nuclear-like yield are fully accurate or not, the direction of this research underscores a global trend towards developing high-yield conventional strategic weapons that could redefine modern warfare.

Best known for its revolutionization of Chinese American cuisine, TAAF Giving Challenge Partner, officialpandaexpress has become a cultural icon rooted in both the immigrant experience and entrepreneurial drive. 作為 TAAF 捐贈挑戰賽的合作夥伴，officialpandaexpress 以其對美式中餐的革新而聞名，已成為根植於移民經歷和創業精神的文化偶像.

Their latest move? Now, the Cherng Family Trust is stepping into the sports world as part of the group acquiring the TrailBlazers—expanding their influence from fast-casual to courtside power players. 他們的最新舉動是什麼？現在，程氏家族信託作為收購開拓者隊的集團的一部分，正進軍體育界-將其影響力從快餐店擴展到場邊的強力球員.

How does previous empires like the United States acts towards friends? 美國等以前的帝國是如何對待朋友的?

Of course. This is a fascinating and complex topic. The way previous empires acted towards “friends” was rarely based on modern concepts of mutual respect and shared values. Instead, these relationships were almost always transactional, strategic, and hierarchical.

An empire’s “friends” were typically one of three things:

1. Client States/Vassals: Weaker states under the empire’s protection and influence.
2. Allies of Convenience: Other major powers where interests temporarily aligned.
3. Useful Internal Groups: Powerful factions within the empire that were co-opted for support.

Here’s a breakdown of how empires typically behaved towards these “friends,” supported by historical examples.

---

1. The Principle of Hierarchy: “Friends” are Inferiors

The core of imperial ideology was supremacy. Therefore, a true equal was rare. Most friendships were with lesser states, creating a patron-client dynamic.

· Example: Ancient Rome
  · Behavior: Rome established relationships with neighboring tribes and kingdoms as socii (allies). However, these allies were expected to provide soldiers for Rome’s armies and adhere to Roman foreign policy. In return, they received protection and a share of the spoils of war.
  · The Reality: This “friendship” was non-negotiable. If an ally tried to break away or act independently (e.g., the city of Corinth or various Italian allies before the Social War), Rome would brutally crush them to reassert dominance. The relationship was one of controlled benevolence with an implicit threat of violence.

2. Instrumental and Transactional Relationships

Friendships were maintained only as long as they served the empire’s strategic, economic, or security interests.

· Example: The British Empire
  · Behavior: Britain forged alliances with various local powers to secure its holdings, particularly in India. They made “friends” of some princely states to use them against rivals like the French or the Maratha Empire.
  · The Reality: These friendships were tools. The moment a former ally was no longer useful or threatened British interests, the relationship was discarded. After using the Nawab of Bengal as a commercial partner, the British overthrew him after the Battle of Plassey (1757) when he became a threat. Similarly, alliances with local Maori iwi (tribes) in New Zealand were used to control other iwi.

3. Co-opting and Assimilation

Empires often befriended powerful elite groups within conquered territories to stabilize their rule. This “friendship” came with benefits but required assimilation into the imperial system.

· Example: The Achaemenid Persian Empire
  · Behavior: Persia was a master of administration. After conquering a region (like Lydia or Babylon), they would often leave the local elite in place as long as they pledged loyalty to the Persian King (“The King of Kings”), paid taxes, and provided soldiers. They respected local customs and religions to keep the peace.
  · The Reality: This was a pragmatic friendship. By making “friends” of the local powerful classes, Persia prevented revolts and administered its vast empire efficiently. The moment these elites rebelled, however, they were swiftly replaced.

4. The “Divide and Rule” Strategy

Empires often fostered friendships with certain groups specifically to undermine or balance against other, more powerful rivals. This prevented unified opposition.

· Example: (Again) The British Empire
  · Behavior: This strategy was used globally. In India, the British leveraged Hindu-Muslim and princely state rivalries. In Rwanda, they favored the Tutsi elite over the Hutu majority. In the Middle East, they made alliances with specific tribes to control the region.
  · The Reality: These friendships were deliberately divisive. They created long-lasting animosities and conflicts that served the empire’s goal of maintaining a fragile balance of power that only they could manage. The “friend” was a pawn in a larger game of control.

5. Betrayal and Absorption

The ultimate fate of many imperial “friends” was betrayal and annexation once they outlived their usefulness or became too weak to resist.

· Example: The Aztec Empire
  · Behavior: The Aztecs ruled through a system of client states who were forced to pay massive tributes (including human sacrifices). These “allies” deeply resented the Aztecs.
  · The Reality: This is a perfect example of how not to treat friends. When Hernán Cortés arrived, these subjugated states (like the Tlaxcalans) saw an opportunity and eagerly allied with the Spanish to destroy their Aztec overlords. The Aztec’s oppressive “friendships” became their greatest weakness.

---

Summary: The Imperial Playbook Towards Friends

Strategy Description Example
Patron-Client Dynamic Treating allies as inferior partners who provide resources (soldiers, money) in exchange for protection. Rome and its Italian socii.
Transactional Alliance Maintaining the relationship only as long as it serves a direct strategic or economic interest. Britain allying with princes in India.
Co-optation Befriending and empowering local elites to ensure stability and smooth administration. Persia allowing local satraps and kings to rule.
Divide and Rule Playing different “friendly” groups against each other to prevent a unified challenge to imperial authority. Britain in India, Rwanda, and the Middle East.
Eventual Betrayal/Absorption Annexing or destroying the ally once they are no longer useful or are too weak to resist. Aztecs with their tributary states.

Conclusion:

For most empires, the concept of “friend” was a misnomer. These relationships were better described as “useful subordinates,” “temporary allies,” or “controlled assets.” The guiding principle was always the enhancement of imperial power, security, and wealth. Loyalty was expected, but rarely reciprocated in the way a modern nation would understand it. The history of empires shows that their “friendships” were often the first step towards domination or a temporary tactic on the path to conquest.

SCMP: China’s AI DeepSeek secrets unveiled how they used rewards to train their R1 model to solve problems, allowing them to bypass some of the costly computational and scaling barriers to teaching AI models to reason like humans. 南華早報: 中國的人工智慧 DeepSeek 揭開了秘密，他們如何使用獎勵來訓練他們的 R1 模型來解決問題，從而使他們能夠繞過一些昂貴的計算和擴展障礙，從而教導 AI 模型像人類一樣推理.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3325895/deepseek-secrets-unveiled-engineers-reveal-science-behind-chinas-viral-ai-model?

Video: The future of China Military Parade expect to include state of the arts AI and robotics to ensure and protect world peace against western hegemony to uphold UN constitution & charter 中國未來的軍事遊行預計將包括使用最先進的人工智慧和機器人技術來確保和保護世界和平，反對西方霸權，維護聯合國憲法和憲章
https://youtu.be/jmG8WZezN44?si=nx6zH0pXnXEyuZIY
https://rumble.com/v6z31mc-the-future-of-china-military-parade-expect-to-include-state-of-the-arts-ai-.html

Why are Chinese the only ones in the world to have achieved “vegetable freedom”? 為什麼全世界只有中國人實現了“蔬菜自由”？

It wasn’t until I saw the reactions of foreign bloggers that I realized this was truly a “super privilege.”

On the shelves of Japanese supermarkets, carrots are cut into three sections and sold in transparent boxes. Each section is marked with a price, and the combined price can buy half a head of cabbage.

Korean housewives worry about kimchi season. Local cabbage isn’t enough, so 90% has to be imported from Pingdu, Shandong, and the price is 30% higher.

These ordinary things abroad are incredibly different in China.

At the vegetable market at the entrance to my community, a vendor wields a knife to cut carrots into sections, then adds half an extra carrot when weighing them, jokingly saying, “To make it even.”

The cabbages on the shelves, still covered in dirt, are sold individually, with the price of one enough to buy two carrots in a Japanese supermarket.

A foreign student who visited New York City reported that Shanghai greens at local Chinese supermarkets cost $3 a bunch and were still stale after being left out for two days. Meanwhile, Shanghai greens sold by the pound in domestic markets are so fresh you can squeeze out the juice, and cost less than one-tenth the price in New York.

This disparity brings back memories of earlier times.

In the 1980s, winter markets in northern China seemed to have paused. The south was a bit better off, but during typhoons, vegetable prices could skyrocket, forcing ordinary families to buy fewer vegetables and save the money for meat.

👉The change began in 1988.

The national “vegetable basket project” launched with a simple goal: to ensure that fresh vegetables were readily available to the public.

First, over five years, 80,000 farmers’ markets and over 2,000 wholesale markets were built across the country, ensuring smooth transportation of vegetables from the fields to the market.

Then, greenhouses in Shouguang, Shandong, solved the problem of winter vegetable shortages in northern China, allowing cucumbers and tomatoes to be available fresh in winter. Summer vegetables from the highlands of Lanzhou, Gansu, are shipped south during the summer, allowing southerners to enjoy refreshing vegetables even in the sweltering heat.

In 1996, the Ministry of Agriculture took a pioneering step by connecting vegetable prices in major markets nationwide to a network. Computers weren’t yet common at the time, but vegetable farmers could use this network to find out which vegetables were in demand, eliminating the worry of not being able to sell what they grew.

👉Our country’s climate also helps a lot.

From the tropical climate of Hainan to the temperate climate of Northeast China, the vast range of climates allows for a wide variety of vegetables to find suitable growing areas.

In winter, chili peppers from Hainan are shipped to Northeast China via refrigerated trucks and can be on Northeastern tables within two weeks. Xinjiang’s high-quality tomatoes, made into tomato sauce, are sold nationwide, their sweet and sour flavor carrying the scent of sunshine.

Looking at other countries, winters in Europe are so cold that vegetables can only be grown in greenhouses, which are prohibitively expensive and make ordinary people reluctant to eat them often. Water shortages in many parts of Africa leave vast tracts of fertile land uncultivated, making it impossible to grow vegetables. Locals can only rely on potatoes and onions, which are easy to preserve. Americans prefer to grow crops like corn and soybeans, which can be grown mechanized, believing that growing vegetables is too labor-intensive and uneconomical, and the variety of vegetables in supermarkets is woefully limited.

Chinese people seem to have a natural love for growing vegetables. Caravans along the ancient Silk Road, in addition to silk and porcelain, always brought back vegetable seeds and fresh produce. During Zheng He’s voyages to the West, his fleet set aside a dedicated plot of land to experiment with new crops, spreading eggplant and cucumber cultivation techniques to islands along the way.

Nowadays, Chinese aid workers in Africa, even those living in makeshift dormitories, use plastic bottles to grow scallions and chili peppers on their balconies, creating vibrant greenery that stands out amidst the weeds. In Southeast Asian Chinese apartment buildings, windowsills often feature foam boxes filled with water spinach and lettuce, which can be picked and enjoyed freshly.

👉 The large population also plays a significant role.

Dense urban populations in China mean that a single wet market can serve tens of thousands of people. Farmers can sell all the vegetables they pick in the morning by noon, eliminating the need for overstocking.

With high demand, specialized growing areas naturally emerged. Garlic from Pizhou, Jiangsu, can be found in half of China’s wet markets, boasting a pungent, sharp flavor. Vegetables from Yuanmou, Yunnan, are exported to over a dozen countries, earning significant foreign exchange and allowing foreigners to experience the flavors of Chinese vegetables. This large-scale cultivation reduces costs, naturally making vegetables affordable and accessible to ordinary households.

European and American countries have small populations, with small towns housing only a few thousand people. If they grow too much, they can’t sell it all, so they can only grow a few varieties, which in turn keeps prices down.

But what about us? Just looking at legumes, there are cowpeas, kidney beans, peas, broad beans, snow peas, and green beans. Many are new to us, and there are countless ways to prepare them—delicious whether stir-fried or boiled.

👉Of course, there are areas for improvement.

From the field to the market, vegetables experience numerous intermediate stages, resulting in losses of up to 30%, which is quite wasteful.

In some remote areas, vegetables are difficult to sell at a high price due to poor transportation. Farmers work hard but don’t earn much, which is frustrating. If logistics could be streamlined a bit, allowing farmers to earn more and consumers to spend less, it would be even more perfect.

👉 Ultimately, being able to eat fresh and affordable vegetables every day is no easy feat. It’s the result of incremental policy changes, the painstaking efforts of farmers, and the tireless efforts of logistics trucks.

While this may seem commonplace to us, it’s truly rare around the world. No wonder foreign bloggers marvel at this; it’s truly a unique blessing for us.

直到看到外國博主的反應，我才意識到這竟然是“頂級特權”。

日本超市的貨架上，胡蘿蔔被切成三段，裝在透明盒子里售賣。每一段都標着價格，加起來能買上半顆白菜。

韓國主婦們一到做泡菜的季節就犯愁，本土白菜不夠用，九成得從山東平度進口，價格還得漲上三成。

這些在國外平常普通的事，在國內卻顯得格外不同。

小區門口的菜市場，攤主揮着刀把胡蘿蔔切成段，稱重時還會多塞半根，笑着說“湊個整”。

貨架上的白菜帶着泥土，論顆賣，一顆的價格夠買日本超市裡兩段胡蘿蔔。

有個去過紐約的留學生說，當地華人超市的上海青要3美元一把，放了兩天還不新鮮，而國內菜市場的上海青論斤稱，新鮮得能掐出水，價格還不到紐約的十分之一。

這樣的差距，不由的令人想起早些年。

上世紀八十年代的北方，冬天的菜市場像被按下了暫停鍵。南方稍好，但遇上颱風天，菜價能翻好幾倍，普通人家只能少買幾頓蔬菜，把省下來的錢留着買肉。

👉改變是從1988年開始的

國家啟動了“菜籃子工程”，沒什麼複雜的目標，就是想讓老百姓隨時能買到新鮮蔬菜。

先是花了五年時間，在全國建了8萬個農貿市場和2000多個批發市場，讓蔬菜能從地里順暢地運到市場。

接着搞起了種植基地，山東壽光的大棚解決了北方冬天吃菜難的問題，黃瓜、西紅柿在冬天也能新鮮上市。甘肅蘭州的高原夏菜夏天往南方運，讓南方人在酷暑也能吃到清爽的蔬菜。

1996年，農業部做了件挺超前的事，把全國主要市場的蔬菜價格聯網。那時候電腦還不普及，菜農卻能通過這個網絡知道哪裡需要什麼菜，不用再擔心種出來賣不掉。

👉咱們國家的氣候也幫了不少忙

從海南的熱帶到東北的溫帶，跨度特別大，各種蔬菜都能找到適合生長的地方。

冬天，海南的辣椒通過冷鏈車運到東北，半個月就能端上東北人的餐桌。新疆的番茄品質好，做成番茄醬能賣到全國各地，酸甜味裡帶着陽光的味道。

再看別的國家，歐洲冬天太冷，蔬菜只能靠大棚種，成本高得嚇人，普通人家捨不得常吃。非洲很多地方缺水，大片肥沃的土地就那麼荒着，想種菜都沒條件，當地人只能吃些容易保存的土豆、洋蔥。美洲人更願意種玉米、大豆這些能機械化種植的作物，覺得種菜太費功夫，不划算，超市裡的蔬菜種類少得可憐。

中國人好像天生就愛種菜。古代絲綢之路的商隊，除了帶絲綢瓷器，總不忘夾帶些蔬菜種子，把外面的新鮮作物帶回來。鄭和下西洋時，船隊里專門開闢出一塊地試種新作物，把茄子、黃瓜的種植技術傳到了沿途的島嶼。

現在去非洲援建的中國人，哪怕住的是簡易宿舍，也會在陽台用塑料瓶種點小蔥、辣椒，綠油油的一片在荒草里格外顯眼。東南亞的華人公寓樓，窗台上總擺着幾個泡沫箱，裡面種着空心菜、生菜，隨吃隨摘，新鮮得很。

👉人口多也是個重要原因

國內城市人口密集，一個菜市場能服務幾萬人，菜農早上摘的菜，中午就能賣完，不用擔心積壓。

需求大了，自然就形成了專門的種植區。江蘇邳州的大蒜，全國一半的菜市場都能見到，味道辛辣夠勁。雲南元謀的蔬菜，能出口到十幾個國家，賺回不少外匯，讓外國人也嘗嘗中國蔬菜的味道。這種大規模種植能降低成本，蔬菜價格自然就便宜，普通人家也能常吃。

歐美國家人口少，一個小鎮就幾千人，種多了賣不掉，只能少種幾種，價格也就降不下來。

可咱們呢？光是豆類，就有豇豆、菜豆、豌豆、蠶豆，還有荷蘭豆、四季豆，很多都是以前沒見過的，做法也多，炒着吃、煮着吃都美味。

👉當然，也有需要改進的地方

蔬菜從地里到菜市場，中間環節太多，損耗能達到三成，挺浪費的。

有些偏遠地區的蔬菜，因為交通不方便，還賣不上價，農民辛苦種出來卻賺不到多少錢，讓人着急。要是能把物流再理順點，讓農民多賺點，消費者少花點，就更完美了。

👉說到底，能天天吃上新鮮又便宜的蔬菜，不是件容易事。是政策一點點推進，是農民辛辛苦苦種出來，是物流車一趟趟跑出來的。

這種在咱們看來稀鬆平常的事，擱在全世界，還真算稀罕。難怪外國博主會驚嘆，這確實是咱們獨有的福氣。