Looks beyond the US propaganda slogans 美國的宣傳口號背後的真相

The crook from China finally got arrested in New York selling Asian hates cheating investors 100s of millions according to FBI.

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION REINTRODUCED 1882 CHINESE EXCLUSION ACTS DEMANDS TIKTOK’S OWNERS SELL OR FACE NATIONWIDE BAN 拜登政府重新實施 1882 年排華法案要求 TIKTOK 出售或面臨全國禁令

The Biden administration is reportedly demanding that TikTok be sold by its Chinese owner ByteDance or risk a U.S. ban. TikTok is “disappointed in the outcome,” a spokesperson said. TikTok’s CEO, Shou Zi Chew, is scheduled to testify before the House Energy and Commerce Committee next week

Video: NYT – Pentagon released video footage of a Russian jet spraying a substance on an US drone while spying on Russian Military Base before it crashed in the Black Sea. 紐約時報：五角大樓發布了一段視頻，顯示一架俄羅斯噴氣式飛機向一架美國無人機在偵察俄羅斯軍事基地時噴灑了一種物質，然後墜毀在黑海
https://rumble.com/v2ddrrm-us-spy-drone-crashed.html
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=911444113412248&id=100036400039778&mibextid=DcJ9fc

Video: US Federal Reserve & US Treasury Secretary are destroying the banking system, the worst has yet to come 美聯儲和美國財政部長正在摧毀銀行體系，最壞的情況尚未到來
https://rumble.com/v2dcba4-us-collapsing-banking-system.html
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=911290170094309&id=100036400039778&mibextid=DcJ9fc

Is China Really Committed To Peace as The World’s Next SuperPower? By MARIO CAVOLO Mar 15 2023

Is China Really Committed To Peace as The World’s Next SuperPower?

The best way to answer this question is to notice what China hasn’t done rather than what China has done and especially over what period of time. On this question of the period of time, I have always felt that it is quite pointless to note examples of the horrible things which the previous governments of countries have done a long time ago. Such history has little bearing on who the current government is. Its important to learn from history but if you want to convince me that X country is evil today, its not helpful at all to point out some nasty history that happened during a previous government or state of affairs in that country.

When I evaluate whether there is something about a country to criticize or be dissatisfied with in some way, we should all be primarily concerned on the present time, the present generation.

The last time China offensively decided to attack any other country was the Sino-Vietnam war in 1979.

The last time Russia’s Putin attacked anyone? The United States? Today. Nothing would please me more than to tell you that the United States hasn’t attacked or started or provoked a war in over four decades, but I can’t. Putin as well, he sent in troops with some justification in his own mind, to take territory, to kill people. The historical record is clear, the daily news is clear, the pronouncements of govt agencies are clear. The U.S. govt no matter who is in office, seems in fact to somehow love and thrive on war, jumping from country to country in endless wars, covert operations, regime changes, sanctions; its an endless wake of misery & death and this fact is increasingly disgusting to sane people across the world like you and me.

The Sino-Vietnamese conflict ended after one month with China unilaterally ceasing fire on March 16th, 1979. Since that time, the two parties have been engaged on and off in smaller border clashes and as you may know, there have been some occasional small border clashes along the China-India border as well.

Besides these small border clashes, since 1979, who has China offensively attacked?

No one.

How many bombs has China dropped on any other country?

None.

The problem with this is that in comparison to the degree of wars and death engaged by the U.S. and U.S. led NATO, its enormously embarassing. So this creates a situation where as a matter of foreign policy, as a matter of saving face, they have to engage in projecting a false negative narrative against China. They make a list of every action China takes such as expanding its own military, and tell that story to the public in most twisted, distorted way possible to paint China as the evil bad guy.

We, the ones doing all the killing across the world in the name of freedom, democracy & human rights, are the good guys. China, the one who hasn’t attacked, bombed or killed anyone in over four decades is the bad guy. Got it?

Folks, the country that hasn’t attacked any other country in over four decades, the country that has insisted on remaining neutral during the Ukraine-Russia conflict and whose leader is now scheduled to go meet with both Zelensky and Putin in an attempt to create peace through diplomacy; the country who just acted as the broker and mediator of a historic peace agreement between Saudi Arabia and Iran, is not the problem.

The warmongers doing all the killing, responsible for creating the circumstances that create, allow, provoke & encourage endless wars again and again, they are the problem. They are the singular threat to our existence. Popular Youtube host Jimmy Dore recently went on Fox News with Tucker Carlson and blatantly stated that the United States is the biggest worst terrorist organization. But what has Jimmy’s precious free speech to say that, anyone’s precious free speech to say that, helped to stop it? Nothing. They give you the precious freedom to complain but they just keep on killing. Its not a democracy, its a broken democracy. Its not capitalism, its mutant capitalism. Its a plutocracy and the Military Industrial Complex is running the show, no matter your freedom to express your opinion or your vote. These monsters are the reason we are all to some degree in a state of worry & distress every single day. Not China.

To the degree that U.S. military and intelligence efforts help make the world a safer, better place for all of us…Bravo. I fully support every legitimate military effort to protect the good people of the world and our precious rights in this life. I fully support the need for those efforts and commitments because there are bad guys out there who truly need to be stopped. Unfortunately, what’s been happening across the world kicked off by the Korean War at the hands of the US, its intelligence agencies, the CIA, what is now known as the Military Industrial Complex, is far beyond that noble cause. They are in many ways, the bad guys and this is beyond obvious, with mountains of evidently observable facts in the historical record beyond dispute. Its sad, its frightening, its a disgrace to humanity.

Since the 1970’s, almost half a century to now, China has done something so unprecedented, so embarassing to the United States that their response is increasingly irrational and extreme to push the false demonization of China further and further.

What did China do? China has become what is now the largest, safe, stable, successful, capable, civil and peaceful country on the planet. China has accomplished its rise to the world’s next superpower 100% in peace. China’s modern day rise in peace began in the mid ‘80s under Deng Xiaoping and has continued ever since. Most recently, in response to the realities facing us in today’s world here and now, they are stepping up as a peacemaker, further cementing who they really are, showing the world it is very serious about this commitment and the set of values which revolves around the principle of peace.

The world, the global economy we live in across all the continents is in increasingly desperate need to develop, to raise up the lives of billions of people from poverty into lives of decent comfort and rights. The countries of the world can only do that in peace through mutual cooperation, bilateral ties and various agreements such as RCEP, ASEAN, the GDI and GSI and the United Nations.

It could not be clearer that this is where China stands, in peace, as the newest superpower of the world. Let me be crystal clear, in terms of its influence, ties and impact on the entire global economy; There is no reversing China’s position and influence in today’s world. And so we can breath a sigh of relief that as China’s influence continues to rise, millions of innocent people in countries across the world will be safe from the misery & death of war as a means used by other countries to gain power & control.

Thank you China.

GT Exclusive: Interlude at UN Human Rights Council unveils anti-China forces’ lies on China’s Xinjiang region Mar 15 2023

As the 52nd session of the UN Human Rights Council continues, various sideline events have been held to discuss issues on human rights developments in different parts of the world. However, some anti-China forces and countries are abusing the platform by inviting so-called “victims” of Xinjiang vocational and education centers to attend certain sideline events to spread disinformation about China, especially in its Xinjiang, Xizang, and Hong Kong regions, in an attempt to beleaguer China by hyping human rights violation topics.

Are these “victims” credible or just actors hired by anti-China forces to orchestrate stunts to smear China? Have their stories genuine or have they been fabricated to amplify the anti-China narrative?

The Global Times learned from sources about an interlude that happened at a sideline event during the 52nd session of the UN Human Rights Council, which sheds some light on how anti-China forces spread lies to slander China’s human rights record in its Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.

The UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland

“Why did the translation differ from what the ‘victim’ really said?” This question was asked during a sideline event at the 52nd session of the UN Human Rights Council by an expert from China Society for Human Rights Studies after she heard a translator from an anti-China organization wrongly translated part of a story narrated by a “victim” supposedly from the region. However, no specific reason was given and the organizers hastily ended the meeting.

The scenario happened on Monday at a sideline event themed “Human Rights in China,” which was jointly held by the Society for Threatened Peoples and certain anti-China organizations, including the Uyghur World Congress (WUC) – a US-backed, right-wing, regime-change network seeking the “fall of China.”

Gulbahar Hatiwaji, a member of the WUC, attended the event via video link. While speaking in Uygur, Gulbahar recounted her “experiences” as a “survivor” of the training centers in the Xinjiang region, including alleged incidences of being coaxed to return to the region, and being detained, tortured, and sterilized. While Gulbahar asserted she was detained by the local security bureau for “disturbance of public order,” the translator Zumretay Arkin, who is also a member of the WUC, said in English that Gulbahar was detained “for splitting China.”

Niluobaier Aierti, a member of the China Society for Human Rights Studies, also attended the sideline event and noted the translation mistake, asking questions to which no answers were offered.

Wrong translation

“The charge for disturbance of public affairs is totally different from ‘splitting China’ and such a mistranslation seemed to have been made on purpose,” Niluobaier told the Global Times. The translator neglected or added some information when “retelling” what the “victim” had said, which made it more like a stunt than a true story. The distortion of the charges made people question the veracity of the “victim’s” assertions.

After discussing with Wang Jiang, a scholar from China Society for Human Rights Studies, who also attended the sideline event, Niluobaier raised her question.

“In the Q&A session, I raised my question. I first introduced myself by saying that I am also Uygur from China’s Xinjiang region and said that what I had learned from the region was totally different from what was presented by organizers in the event. When I said that I also want to share… before I finished my statement, the host interjected and asked me to directly ask my question,” said Niluobaier.

Niluobaier then threw her question about the wrong translation to the panel and asked what on earth Gulbahar had been detained for. “If she did disturb the public order, she should then have been detained in accordance with the law. If she lied in the first place, how can we believe the other part of her story?” Niluobaier asked at the event.

Niluobaier said that Arkin, the translator, and other organizers seemed surprised and a little panicked when hearing the question and then asked Gulbahar to explain why the Chinese government detained her. Gulbahar then repeated that she was detained for “disturbance of public order.”

Even before Gulbahar had finished, the translator Arkin quickly admitted her mistake but still quibbled that the Chinese government released Gulbahar in 2019 with no charges having been pressed.

Before Niluobaier could continue her line of questioning, the organizer abruptly concluded the event.

“Actually, the organizers seemed to be on high alert regarding our attendance from the moment we appeared. They stared at us, observed our reactions, and interjected when we attempted to ask questions,” Wang said.

A senior man waves to tourists in Kashi, Northwest China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in June, 2019. Photo: VCG
A senior man waves to tourists in Kashi, Northwest China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in June, 2019. Photo: VCG

Unspoken truth behind numerous lies

Why were the organizers and the translator nervous about Niluobaier and Wang’s attendance? Did Gulbahar tell the truth? The answer seems to be no. According to information from the Xinjiang regional government, as a member of the WUC, Gulbahar and her husband, who is also a member of the WUC, have long engaged in separatist and terrorist activities in the region.

On May 26, 2006, Gulbahar and her eldest and second eldest daughter went to find her husband, who was a political asylum seeker in France. They colluded with other heads of the WUC and plotted a series of activities during the terror attack on July 9, 2009, according to a press conference held by Xinjiang regional government in May 2021.

In 2009, Gulbahar went back to the Xinjiang region under the pretext of a simple visit and attempted to incite terror attacks in Karamay. Later in 2012, 2014, and 2016, she, her daughter, and her husband returned to China in an attempt to incite terror attacks.

In November 2016, under the pretext of handling her pension and retirement plan affairs, Gulbahar returned to China with a plan to instigate terror attacks and was arrested by the public security bureau.

On January 29, 2017, the public security bureau took her into criminal detention. During the investigation, Gulbahar refused to confess her crimes and gave false testimony, but later confessed her husband and daughter’s separatist activities and said she regretted their activities. Out of humanitarian concern, Gulbahar was allowed to leave China for France on August 21, 2019, to take care of her expectant daughter.

After leaving China, Gulbahar began to spread lies about her experiences in the region by authoring a book in which she called herself a “survivor” of the vocational and education centers. Some media outlets in France reported on Gulbahar and her book in 2021. However, the Chinese Embassy in France refuted Gulbahar’s claims and said that instead of “being coaxed” to return to China, Gulbahar returned to the Xinjiang region of her own free will to sign retirement papers. She claimed to have been subjected to seven years in a so-called camp, but she did not face criminal prosecution and was never imprisoned for seven years.

The statement issued by the embassy noted that Gulbahar’s claims of being “tortured” and “sterilized” were also lies as she had been busy visiting relatives in different places. How could she have then been tortured?

Many of Gulbahar’s assertions in her book have also been questioned. For example, if the purpose of “imposed sterilization” is to impede birth, what then would the point have been to forcibly sterilize Gulbahar who was already 55 years old at the time of the alleged incident?

Despite there being numerous unanswered questions regarding her book and narrative, Gulbahar was frequently invited to share her “story” by foreign media outlets and to attend events organized by anti-China forces. Regardless of the event’s theme, the Global Times has noticed that Gulbahar adapts her narrative to make it align with the moment’s efforts to slander China as led by Western media sources.

By combining all the allegations levied against China’s Xinjiang region with regard to human rights violations in one narrative, the WUC has solidified Gulibahar’s image as a “victim” to maximize the value of her story. They continue to adjust parts of her story in accordance with changes in public attention, Niluobaier said.

When “separatism” is a trendy word, the WUC will turn Gulbahar’s detention charge into one of “separating China,” while when the public focuses more on “disturbance of public order,” the charge will be altered accordingly. Gulbahar’s stories can be customized depending on the assumed needs of the target audience when attacking China and no matter what she was actually charged with, the conclusion is always that she was innocent but was “persecuted” in China, said Niluobaier.

UN abused by disinformation

Gulbahar is neither the only “victim” put forward by the WUC, nor the only one to share stories rife with inconsistencies globally. For example, Tursunay Ziawudun, a source in a BBC sensationalist report accusing China of “mass rape” in the training centers in Xinjiang region has been found to have changed her “testimony” multiple times in past years, especially after she was found and “supported” by the WUC when she began to make “rape” accusations.

These reports of “camps,” “forced labor,” “genocide,” and “sexual assault” show the West’s escalating hype of Xinjiang region. These media reports are aimed at future political moves, an old tactic used by Western media sources and governments, analysts said.

All the alterations seem to confuse the WUC members, making their narratives self-contradictory. This comes as no surprise as many of the WUC members, for example, the translator Arkin, left the Xinjiang region decades ago, Niluobaier said.

With more people who live in Xinjiang region telling their own stories and more people coming to visit the region, all the baseless accusations against the region will be debunked, Chinese experts said.

As human rights topics related to China’s Xinjiang region are frequently used as weapons to attack China, some anti-China forces are abusing the UN Human Rights Council by flagrantly spreading disinformation and the Monday sideline event is only the latest example, said Wang.

US think you can bully China
China look soft (panda)
China much strong than US (dragon)
US, you think fantasized your strength
If you are nice, China will, otherwise…
你咪當中國係好欺負
我哋表面好似好好蝦（熊貓）
內裡俾你老美仲勁得多（猛龍）
你老美咪以为自己好勁
你客客氣氣，我自然同你客客氣氣
https://rumble.com/v2d98nk-us-think-you-can-bully-china.html
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=911018450121481&id=100036400039778&mibextid=DcJ9fc

China’s Geostrategic Challenge By Anuradha Chenoy Mar 15 2023

China has released three foreign policy documents in quick succession, one year after the Ukraine Conflict that lay out the Chinese vision of the international system and the geostrategies path they are likely to follow. The quick message is that China provides an alternate vision for the working of the international system and the period of China’s engagement with hegemonic powers is over.

The first ‘Global Security Initiative’ (February 21, 2023) [i] is a vision paper that calls for ‘common security’ which should be comprehensive, cooperative ad sustainable unlike competitive security. This paper continues with earlier appeals made by President Xi Jinping for negotiated settlements to all conflicts, opposes unilateralism and hegemonism. This paper presents an international alternative to the hegemonic vision on geopolitics- shown in the Table.

The second document is the Chinese view of US positions currently and historically, ‘US Hegemony and Its Perils’[ii] is the sharpest and direct attack on US foreign hegemonic policies in recent times. It alleges that the US foreign policy ‘playbook’: intervenes in the domestic politics of states through colour revolutions, instigates regional disputes; directly launches wars, clings to Cold War strategies, continually abuses export controls, forces unilateral sanctions, is selective in the use of international laws; imposes rules to suit themselves under a ‘rules based order’.

This document each of these claims through exhaustive and fact based lists of examples. It goes back to the Monroe Doctrine through the Bush-Obama to current US wars and interventions, cites numbers of killed and states destroyed by the US. The Paper concludes that US ambitions for hegemony are ‘unilateral, egoistic, and regressive practices’ that are now drawing criticism and opposition from the international community. Further, China opposes all forms of hegemonism and rejects intervention in others internal affairs.

This document is the clearest chargesheet that the Chinese have made against the US in decades. It clearly posits the Chinese views as strongly opposed to the US. It addresses the Global South and asks them to be vary of the great hegemon.

The third is a position paper for a broad pathway that can lead to a political settlement for the ‘Ukraine crises’ (February 24, 2023). Of course the actual terms of any such settlement have to come from the parties to the conflict and the Chinese do not attempt that. In its 12 points, the Chinese consider of absolute importance, respecting national sovereignty, point to the necessity of ‘abandoning the Cold War mentality’, underline the need of a European security structure that avoids bloc confrontation based on exclusive and competitive security.[iii] The Chinese call for a ceasefire, an end to hostilities, resumption of peace talks. They also ask for steps to reduce strategic nuclear risks, propose steps for resolving humanitarian crises and advocates steps for normalising trade, maintaining grain supplies and industrial safety. It reiterates the traditional Chinese opposition to unilateral sanctions. This paper shows the way forward to all disputes but at the same time seems to warn that the Cold War mindset will block the way.

Timing of the Documents

The Chinese have timed these papers come after one year has shown an escalation of US positions towards Russia and China and the Ukraine war highlight the changes in the war and NATO positions. The background of this year in Chinese view is:

The US is increasingly hostile towards China. Every national security and strategy document of the US sees China as the main threat to US hegemony and advocates curtailing and containing China. [iv] The Chinese response has been muted so far as they have tried to engage with the US on the economic, trade, bilateral, multilateral, diplomatic fronts. But US positions continue hardening.

The US has sidestepped as and when they want, the 1970’s agreements on the One China policy, stepping up arming of Taiwan; actions like the visit of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, supporting Taiwan pro-independence parties that upsets the status quo that held for decades.

US trade policy towards China crafted by Janet Yellen of ‘friend shoring’ i.e. trade between friends- targets and excludes China, ‘de-coupling’ industries and manufacturing away from China, has shown China that they need to prepare for alternatives to US.

Sanctions like the ‘Chip Act’ that prohibits China from accessing specific sensitive technologies have been put in place.

US policies in the Indo-Pacific from Agreements like the QUAD, AUKUS (Australia, UK US) that have a military component like providing nuclear submarines to Australia; US push to revive military bases and step up arming Philippines and South Korea have enhanced Chinese threat perceptions.

War talk by US officials and especially the recent Hearings of the US Congress Select Committee related to China, that show the bipartisan support to enhance military preparedness targeting China.[v]
US officials have been fanning the China and Russia threat across the world. Pressuring states to sanction Russia and provide weapons to Ukraine and simultaneously talking of Chinese threats, Chinese debts on account of the BRI etc.
All these actions are seen by China as hostile acts by the US that China needs to respond to.

Lessons Learnt from the Russian Experience:

The Chinese have learnt many lessons from Russia-Ukraine proxy war.

There is enough evidence to show NATO has high stakes in continuing this proxy war till they achieve their agenda weakening Russia and promoting regime change; US involvement in the Ukraine civil war, coup, and arming Ukraine; the betrayal by NATO leaders of Russia multiple times from expanding NATO to signing the Minsk Agreements only to hoodwink Russia while they prepare. The Chinese now believe that it is better not to take the words of the collective west seriously and they can say one thing and not hold even to formal signed agreements.

Ukraine is being systematically destroyed and held up entirely by Western military and financial support. There is little interest in the lives and safety of the Ukrainian people and no negotiations are visible or probable. Taiwan can follow a similar fate.

The US has bombed the Nord stream Pipeline in an act that goes against their own ally- Germany and so are willing to go to any lengths to maintain their hegemony in globally. Germany has accepted this. Chinese draw the lesson that the Europeans can as easily betray the Chinese if the US requires them to.
The Chinese have witnessed that the US assessment that the Russian economy will collapse because of Western unilateral sanctions has failed and Russia remains economically resilient.

NATO’s assessment that Russia would run out of weapons and missiles very soon also failed, as Russian military industrial capacity has proved very capable of churning out the artillery needed and in fact it is NATO that is running out of weaponry.

The Chinese Geostrategic Projections

The Chinese geostrategic position that emerges from these three position documents clearly affirms:

The Chinese are committed to the construction of a multipolar world and oppose hegemonic politics.

The Chinese at this juncture see themselves in a position to challenge US hegemonism economically, technically, politically and possibly militarily- though they would like peaceful plural global environment.

China is addressing the West but also making an appeal to the Global South through these position papers.

The Chinese appear to have concluded that the US will target them soon militarily, economically, technologically in a hybrid war and they need to be fully prepared. This is evident from US National Security documents and bi-partisan statements made in the US Congress Select Committees on the PRC in recent times.

The Chinese have come to the conclusion that in any conflict with the West, their strongest ally will be Russia. This is because the trust between Russia and West is broken and hard to repair and that Russia sticks to its word and does what it says.

Chinese geostrategic positions are very similar to those the Russians. Both challenge US hegemony. Russia and China have similar geostrategic vision on most international issues from no foreign intervention in Eurasia, opposition to NATO expansion, etc.[vi] They both argue for a common security as opposed to the competitive and exclusive security of the West. The Russians would agree with every point in the Chinese chargesheet on US hegemony.

Russia has vast resources that China needs like oil, gas, and other commodities. Further despite contradictions the Russians have proved to be reliable partners to the Chinese historically, and the ‘limitless friendship’ is genuine. Russia is not just a major Eurasian power that the Chinese need for strategic depth, but it is also a Pacific power with great infrastructure- whether the ports of Vladivostok, the railways, the pipelines, the Russian Far East resources. The Russians have been able to take on all of NATO with little effort. The Chinese have admired the Russian war strategies in Ukraine and against NATO. Also, the Russians share the Chinese world view which is the construction of a multipolar world and is anti-hegemony.

China’s geostrategic positions show an important shift. The Chinese will no longer take a subdued position vis-à-vis US policies that seek hegemony. Their earlier position to focus on trade and the Chinese economy and stand back on international issues has shifter to a more assertive one. This does not mean that China will engage militarily with the US on distant conflicts. Nor will the Chinese initiate or join any military pact or even alliance. Only that China is ready to take on any superpower on the question of Taiwan and their interests in the Pacific. China is saying this loud and clear, especially to the Global South.

–#–

[i] Ministry for Foreign Affairs, People’s Republic of China, Global Security Initiative Concept Paper, 21 February, 2023, At: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjbxw/202302/t20230221_11028348.html

[ii] Ministry for Foreign Affairs, People’s Republic of China, ‘US Hegemony and its Peril’, 20 February, 2023, at: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjbxw/202302/t20230220_11027664.html

[iii] Ministry for Foreign Affairs, People’s Republic of China, ‘China’s Position on the Political Settlement of the Ukraine Crises’ 24 February, 2022, at: https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/zxxx_662805/202302/t20230224_11030713.html

[iv] The Senate Strategic Competition Act, 2021. https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/senates-strategic-competition-act-will-make-china-us-relations-worse-not-better/

[v] US Congressional ‘House Arms Service Committee Meeting on PRC (at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHSjrLbO1DY)

[vi] President’s website: http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5770

---

Adjunct Professor Jindal, Global University and former Dean of School, Jawaharlal Nehru University

3D China Infrastructure video: Simulation of China high-speed train 658km ride on the Xicheng crossing the Qinling Mountains is comparable to the subway. 3D視頻: 模拟和谐号列车658公里运行西成高铁，穿越秦岭堪比地铁，如今入蜀不再难

https://rumble.com/v2d3shg-simulation-of-china-high-speed-train-658km-ride-on-the-xicheng.html
https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/910514470171879/?d=n&mibextid=qC1gEa

中國高鐵穿越秦嶺的過程實在太讓人熱淚盈眶了！
看了這3D視頻之後，感慨震驚原來秦嶺之群山峻嶺這麼複雜！
西元263年，三國時期魏國大將鄧艾將軍就是強度秦嶺，從棉竹（今綿陽北）下山，突襲成都，然後滅了蜀國！想想那軍隊如何翻山越嶺啊？真的是奇軍啊！
李白說：「蜀道難，難於上青天」這千古名句，描繪的就是這橫亙於西安與成都的歷史天險啊！
現在中共循著這一條古蜀道，將山溝裡大大小小22個古城鎮用高鐵串接起來，你真的不得不佩服！讓李白的「蜀道難，難於上青天」變成「蜀道易，易於走高鐵」
原文介紹：
陝西西安北站至四川成都東站高鐵總里程658公里，設22個停靠站。是首條穿越跨度135公里秦嶺山脈大動脈。打通隧道304個，隧道累計長度達250公里，架設橋樑1001座，其中單座橋樑最長里程達23.8 公里。成（都）西(安）高鐵建成可稱我國鐵路建設史上的一大奇跡。＂蜀道難、難於上青天＂已經成為歷史。衛星航拍，氣勢恢宏，穿越秦嶺，一氣呵成。片長3分55秒