US Federal Reserve and the White House tried to manipulate the stock market for the Democrats last desperate attempts to save the November election, not working! 美聯儲和白宮試圖操縱股市，為民主黨最後一次拼命挽救11月大選，沒有奏效！

Asian Americans are living through years of great hatred, lives of his fellow migrants were “cheaper than those of dogs” forcibly shoved off the streets when they showed resistance. 亞裔美國人生活在多年的仇恨中，他的移民同胞的生活“比狗還便宜”，當他們表現出抵抗時，他們被強行趕出了街道.

https://americanhistory.si.edu/more-about-san-francisco-chinatown-banner

Those words were published nearly 80 years ago, and yet they echo loudly as Asian faces continue to be targets on America’s streets. By Theodore S. Gonzalves

Please also refer to: Thousands Miles Home 萬里尋根歸家路 By Johnson Choi 蔡永強, Oct 6 2022

Thousands Miles Home – by Johnson Choi

More about the San Francisco Chinatown Banner

“The banner affords us an opportunity to consider the complicated histories of Asians in the Americas, stories that have been centuries in the making.”

Asian Americans are living through years of great hatred. That’s how the Philippine writer Carlos Bulosan referred to the anti-Asian violence in his memoir, America is In the Heart. He wrote that the lives of his fellow migrants were “cheaper than those of dogs” and that they were “forcibly shoved off the streets when they showed resistance.” Those words were published nearly 80 years ago, and yet they echo loudly as Asian faces continue to be targets on America’s streets.

As a curator of Asian Pacific American History at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History, I work with colleagues to ensure that our museum presents the fullness of the humanity of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. With the COVID-19 pandemic as the backdrop, I also want to make sure we seek out objects for the national collections that will help us make historical sense of our present moment.

Not long ago, I learned from a retired superior court judge active in San Francisco’s Chinatown about a rally and a march that took place in the earliest days of the pandemic, on February 29, 2020. I wondered: Could an object from that rally be a candidate for the national collections? Judge Julie M. Tang (ret.) sent me photos and video of the San Francisco demonstration. At the front of the march, a bold banner stood out.

Made of vivid red vinyl, the banner—approximately 11-feet wide by four-feet high—has black felt lettering outlined in white. The topmost line is in English and reads: “Fight the Virus, NOT the People!” The lower two lines are in Cantonese; the text translates to: “Together we support the businesses, [we are] against discrimination” and “[We] support fighting the global pandemic, add oil.” That last bit about the oil, it was explained to me, is a famous Chinese idiom, meaning “keep it going” or “keep it up with courage and determination.”

Judge Tang informed me of a diverse coalition that came together for a 1,000-person strong demonstration. She said: “We decided to go out to the streets and shout out our concerns. We want everyone to know what we were worried about: Our lives, our jobs, our businesses, and our survival in the United States.”

Just 11 days after the San Francisco rally, the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus a global pandemic. I asked myself, “How could this community have predicted what was about to happen?” That was the wrong question. The residents of the oldest Chinatown in North America didn’t have special powers to look into the future. Instead, the organizers of the march seemed to make sense of both the present and the past by grappling with what historians James and Lois Horton have referred to as the “tough stuff of American memory.”

The banner affords us an opportunity to consider the complicated histories of Asians in the Americas, stories that have been centuries in the making. The demonstration’s sponsor, the Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association, was founded in San Francisco in 1882, in part to push back against anti-Chinese violence. That was the same year as the passage of the infamous Chinese Exclusion Act, a federal ban on immigration to this country based on ethnicity or national origin. Just a few weeks after Congress passed the law, a political cartoon ran in the San Francisco-based popular weekly The Wasp, depicting three ghoulish figures hovering over the port city. In each of their gowns were sewn the words “malaria,” “smallpox,” and “leprosy,” repeating public officials’ common refrain of associating Chinatown residents with public health crises.

The histories of Asians in the Americas often focus almost exclusively on acts of victimization and hardship. But this one-hundred-year period, from the 1840s to the 1940s, reveals complex dynamics about labor migration, settlement, and resistance.

Consider the contradictions between business’s need for inexpensive labor and combine it with nativists’ vision for their narrowed version of what the nation should be. Capital welcomed thousands from Asia and the Pacific Islands to the United States and its territories to work in fields, factories, hotels, and restaurants. Years of attracting “undesirables” stirred nativist panics over jobs, sexual jealousies, and health scares into a potent mix resulting in federal exclusion laws: Chinese in 1875 and 1882, South Asians in 1917, Japanese in 1924, and Filipinos in 1934.

When students and community organizers in the 1960s started using the term “Asian American” to define themselves, they staked out what they felt was important about their understanding of United States history. It was not simply an identity born of victimization. To be sure, it is important to make plain in the historical ledger the facts of who did what to whom. But what happened to these groups is incomplete without understanding how they responded. The term “Asian American” was premised on resistance and solidarity.

Banners like the one that is now part of the nation’s flagship history museum bear the hopes and fears of their makers, the dreams as much as the nightmares of ancestors, and challenges to others for a more just shared future. They serve as portals to many more stories about how to face the tough stuff of American memory with courage and determination.

—Theodore S. Gonzalves, curator of Asian Pacific American History

Grace Young: Wok Whisperer and Chinatown Activist

Grace Young stands in a doorway. The door is decorated with the text, “A Love Letter to Chinatown.”

Grace Young, a New Yorker with family roots in San Francisco, is a tireless advocate for support of AAPI communities and historic Chinatowns across the country. As an historian of Chinese cuisine and the author of three award-winning cookbooks, Young has worked for decades to enlighten American home cooks on aspects of Chinese history and culture. Known as the wok whisperer and stir-fry guru, she has long practiced the art of gastro-diplomacy to bring people together through food.

Since 2020, when the global pandemic unleashed acts of discrimination and violence against AAPI communities across the United States, Grace Young embraced a more direct form of activism. Risking her own health and safety, she embarked on a project with Poster House museum in New York to document the impacts of COVID-19 on Chinese restaurants and workers. The video series, Coronavirus: Chinatown Stories, records the stories and voices of people facing economic uncertainty and community devastation. Young also organized a campaign to provide Chinatown residents with hand-held alarms for their personal use as incidents of anti-Asian hate escalated.

Grace Young is the 2022 recipient of the Julia Child Award, an annual award presented by the Julia Child Foundation for Gastronomy and the Culinary Arts to an individual who has made a significant impact on the way America cooks, eats, and drinks. Presented at a ceremony at the National Museum of American History, the award recognizes Young’s extraordinary culinary, cultural, and activist work, and will further amplify her message of support for Chinatowns, AAPI restaurants, and small businesses in communities across the country.

For more information about Young, Julia Child, and the award, please visit the exhibition FOOD: Transforming the American Table on 1 East.

—Paula Johnson, curator and project director, American Food and Wine History Project

Video: PLA replaced US military in Saudi? No way, shameless-won’t leave! US Congress mad at Saudi dared not obeying. Saudi said so what? 解放軍進駐沙烏地替換美軍？OPEC+減產美參眾兩院痛批敵對行為！嗆撤3千美軍, 中俄笑看白宮你快點撤, 我笑你不敢
https://rumble.com/v1n0wk8-pla-replaced-us-military-in-saudi-no-way-shameless-us-wont-leave.html
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=806275290595798&id=100036400039778

The good old days will be coming back to Europe. Going back to nature. 過去的美好時光將回到歐洲. 回歸自然.

As European leaders meet, questions remain over whether a new all whites colonialists political club will actually work 隨著歐洲領導人會面，關於一個新的全白人殖民主義政治俱樂部是否真的有效的問題仍然存在 by Fan Anqi Oct 07 2022

Leaders from 44 European countries – the whole of the continent except Russia and Belarus – met on Thursday in Czech capital Prague to attend the inaugural meeting of the European Political Community, a new regional group proposed by French President Emmanuel Macron this May. 

While eyeing issues from Europe’s security to soaring energy prices and a looming economic recession, analysts said the gathering could be just another “grand show of solidarity,” a talking shop without any actual content. They warned that such a group could develop into a new bloc confrontation with Russia, further worsening Europe’s security situation. 

The inaugural meeting included all 27 members of the European Union, plus 17 other nations including the UK, Ukraine and Turkey. The only two nations not invited were Russia and its neighboring ally Belarus, according to media reports.

In remarks at the opening, Macron said the group’s existence is aimed at “sending a message of unity to all European nations by building a strategic closeness and finding common strategies,” media reported on Thursday. 

Despite the rhetoric, critics questioned if any concrete results could be delivered, as no formal policy statements, resolutions or declarations were expected. 

“The purpose for this freshly born European Political Community is to reshape the geopolitical landscape of Europe in the context of the Russian-Ukraine conflict, a reflection of France’s vision for Europe’s future political map. As it’s still an idea lacking concrete plans, the inaugural meeting aims to establish and strengthen a so-called European identity, but it is difficult to say how far it can go,” Cui Hongjian, director of the Department of European Studies at the China Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.

Its sheer size – a group of 44 countries – will be a major obstacle in delivering concrete results, as traditional rivalries, from Armenia and Azerbaijan to Greece and Turkey, remain among its members, the analyst said.

It is impossible to take any concrete action before reaching a consensus, while the latter itself could be a very long and difficult process, noted Cui.

Skepticism has risen among countries pushing to join the EU – Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova and the Western Balkan states – expressing concern that it could end up being a “consolation prize” replacing serious membership discussions, media reports said. 

Cui said the European Political Community could be a “placebo” to appease countries that are eager to join the EU but could not do so in the short term, as different voices have risen within the EU as to the accession of these countries, for example, France’s reluctance to accept Ukraine’s joining in an accelerated manner. 

Thursday’s summit featured a series of meetings where leaders discussed the key challenges Europe faces, including security, energy, climate, the economy and migration. 

The most pressing issue of the day and the one topic that discussions revolved around, analysts said, is the devastating energy crisis, dashed most recently by leaks at the Nord Stream gas pipelines linking Russia to Europe via the Baltic Sea.

The French government on Thursday launched a package of measures aimed at cutting the country’s energy consumption in the hope of getting through the winter without power cuts. One of the measures is to cap indoor temperatures at 19 C, meanwhile providing heat two weeks later than usual for households, businesses and administrations and ending it two weeks earlier, France 24 reported.

Germany announced it will spend up to 200 billion euros ($197.50 billion) to help consumers and businesses cushion the pain from soaring gas bills.

The scheme, however, caught Brussels and the other capitals off guard, reported Euronews, as concerns mounted that it might trigger a negative spill-over effect beyond borders and distort competition in the single market. 

“Without a common European solution, we seriously risk fragmentation. So it is paramount that we preserve a level playing field for all,” said European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen over the weekend.

Apart from energy talks, the meeting is intended to send a strong signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin highlighting Moscow’s isolation, media reported. 

However, experts warn that the signal of political rejection toward Russia could be developed into a bloc confrontation on the European continent, which would not help maintain regional stability but further worsen the security situation of Europe. 

Former German chancellor Angela Merkel said on Thursday, Europe can achieve lasting peace only with the involvement of Russia, TASS reported on Friday.

US efforts on fake news propaganda against China failed again. UN human rights body rejects Xinjiang-related bid, ‘a victory for justice and truth’ 美國對華假新聞宣傳的努力再次失敗。聯合國人權機構拒絕涉疆申辦，“正義與真理的勝利” by Global Times

The UN Human Rights Council made of 47 member states rejecting the bid of the US and some Western countries to debate human rights on Northwest China’s Xinjiang is widely considered by the Western media as a “diplomatic win” for China, but some Chinese experts hold cautionary optimism toward this phased victory due to the narrow margin in vote. Observers said that the US and the West will continue coercing those who abstained in the vote to change their positions and ramp up efforts in slandering China over its Xinjiang policy in the upcoming meetings, however more countries maintaining objective views on Xinjiang affairs will resist the US-led smear campaign targeting China.

The UN Human Rights Council’s vote of 19-17 against a US-led draft decision on Northwest China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region showed that the international community won’t be easily misled despite pressure from the US and some other Western countries, said a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson in a late statement on Thursday.

The international community is clearly aware that the ultimate motive of the US and some other Western countries behind their Xinjiang narrative is to contain China and does not like this pattern of using human rights as a pretext to meddle in other countries’ internal affairs, said the spokesperson.

The remarks came after the 51st session of the Human Rights Council on Thursday voted down a draft decision on Xinjiang region, which was pushed by the US and some of its Western allies.

The US and its allies presented the first draft decision in September targeting China to the UN’s top human rights body, seeking as “a bare minimum a discussion on Xinjiang,” AFP reported.

The draft decision came up after the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR) released the so-called assessment report on Xinjiang on August 31 following Bachelet’s visit to Xinjiang. However, the Global Times learned earlier that the report is a “product with no factual basis, no authority and no credibility,” with the US and some Western forces as well as anti-China forces behind it.

The council in Geneva voted 19-17 against holding a debate on human rights in Xinjiang, with 11 nations abstaining, according to media report.

Some countries with large Muslim populations such as Indonesia and some from the Middle East and Africa including the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Cameroon and Cote d’Ivoire voted against the debate while countries such as Argentina, Brazil, India and Ukraine abstained.

This is a victory for developing countries and a victory for truth and justice, Hua Chunying, spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said in a Tweet on Thursday. “Human rights must not be used as a pretext to make up lies and interfere in other countries’ internal affairs, or to contain, coerce and humiliate others,” she said.

Some Western media described the outcome as “a major blow” for the US and small clique that it leads as the draft decision was put forward by countries such as the US, the UK, Australia and Canada.

The Financial Times said, “Thursday’s vote was a diplomatic victory for China, which has rejected criticism of its actions in Xinjiang as unfounded.”

This outcome showed that some countries hold the right values and human rights perspectives, resist the powerful smear campaign of the US and the West and keep clear views on the human rights in Xinjiang, which also signaled China’s successful international communication of human rights affairs, He Zhipeng, a professor of international law at the School of Law with Jilin University, told the Global Times on Friday.

“What the US and some Western countries have done is typically politicizing the human rights issues. What they really care about is not the human rights in Xinjiang but whether they could play Xinjiang and human rights cards to contain China and slow down the country’s development,” He said.

Some Chinese experts also pointed out that the narrow margin in vote shows that the wrestling among countries on human rights issues has been growingly fierce and the US and some Western countries are abusing the multilateral platforms and relevant procedures to consume the international human rights resources, squandering more time on geopolitical competition.

No matter how the draft decision is disguised, its real intention is to take advantage of UN human rights bodies to interfere in China’s internal affairs, so as to serve their political purpose of using Xinjiang-related issues to contain China, which is another example of politicization and instrumentalization of human rights issues, Chen Xu, China’s Permanent Representative to the UN Office in Geneva, said on Thursday.

The draft decision is not pro-human rights, but for political manipulation. It will not promote dialogue, but only lead to new confrontations, Chen noted. “China is targeted this time, and any other developing countries could be targeted anytime in the future.”

More intense wrangle

At the 51st session of the UN Human Rights Council and the UN General Assembly in late September, more countries expressed opposition to US and Western countries’ politicization of human rights issues, which, in the eyes of experts, showed China and a wider group of countries will work together to defend true multilateralism and resist US hegemony.

Some countries with high proportion of Muslim population voted against the draft decision because they agree with China’s preventive measures to counter violent terrorism, radicalization and separatism, and some have taken or plan to take similar measures in their countries, an expert on Xinjiang affairs and human rights who preferred not to be named told the Global Times on Friday.

“Similar measures adopted by other countries did not arouse strong reaction or criticism from the US and the West because these countries are not imaginary enemies of the West and therefore not targeted,” he said.

In early August, 32 diplomatic envoys posted to China and senior diplomats from 30 Islamic countries visited Xinjiang, and what the delegation saw and heard along the way is completely different from what some Western media reported as the freedom of religious belief and various rights of Muslims are duly guaranteed, according to the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

However, as there was a narrow margin in vote this time, the anonymous expert warned that the US and the West will surely use a series of measures pressuring or coercing those countries abstained to change their position and plan to launch a Xinjiang-targeted human rights campaign in the next UN human rights body meeting in March 2023, which China should be well prepared for.

The UN Human Rights Council holds no fewer than three regular sessions a year, for a total of at least 10 weeks, which take place in February-March, June-July and September-October, according to its website. Sessions can be three, four or five weeks long, depending on the program of work.

The OHCHR has been trying to resist Western influence for quite a long time, but such resistance became less effective because of personnel reshuffle, He said. “For international and multilateral organizations such the UN Human Rights Council and the OHCHR, if they forget their original aspiration of unifying other countries to push forward human rights progress and end up being politicized by certain countries, it will hurt their reputation,” he said.

There are many human rights-related issues that the world should pay attention to today including those caused by climate change, science and technological development and the impact of big data, aging population and so on, some experts said, who also suggested that on some major human rights issues, countries share common concerns but the geopolitical confrontation won’t be helpful in tackling them.

Video: Oil price war: Saudi Arabia and Russia join forces to counter the US selling out friends and allies to enrich itself everyday 油價大戰: 沙俄聯手抗衡美國 挑戰美聯儲 美國天天出賣盟友朋友 沙特受夠了
https://rumble.com/v1mxyl6-oil-price-war-saudi-arabia-and-russia-join-forces.html
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=805801837309810&id=100036400039778

Thousands Miles Home 萬里尋根歸家路 By Johnson Choi 蔡永強, Oct 6 2022

Let me start with a true Chinese story taught in Rosaryhill School in Hong Kong.

In ancient times, there was a story called “Mengzi’s mother moved three times”, that was the mother of Mencius wanted to create a good learning environment for her children.

The first move was right next to the tomb, so Mencius learned to do a lot of funerals. When Mencius’ mother saw that, she moved quickly.

The second time he moved near the vegetable market, Mencius learned to sell things and pork there. Mother Meng felt that it was not a place to stay for a long time, so she moved again.

In the end, he moved near the school, and Mencius went to the school every day to study with everyone. Only then did Mother Meng feel more at ease.

Mencius would not have become a accomplished scholar in China without his mother Meng choosing a good environment. Therefore, if a person is successful in learning and morality, he does have a direct relationship with his parents and teachers as well as the environment.

Who is Mengzi?

Mencius or Mèngzǐ was a Chinese Confucian philosopher who has often been described as the “second Sage”, that is, after only Confucius himself. He is part of Confucius’ fourth generation of disciples. Mencius inherited Confucius’ ideology and developed it further.

It is quite obvious your environments impact your current and future live, especially your children and grandchildren.

When your children and grandchildren raised in an environment filled with hate crimes, racism, legalized illegal drugs, crack cocaine readily available, guns, murders, violence including police violence against people of color, legalized thief, homeless many with mental problems and regularly received verbal attacks by Anglo Saxon politicians solely because of your skin color, if you are a mother or grandmother, do you see a bright future for your children and grandchildren?

The reasons why millions of Chinese left China is the very same reasons why Chinese should now consider leaving their foster homes in US and other Anglo Saxon colonialist countries to return to China, especially when you are young, smart, educated with special skills. The future, the next 100 years is in China, Asia, India, Middle East and Africa. Let me emphasis, leaving the US foster home is not for everyone especially for the retirees with little to no resources and non-technical blue color workers.

Let us take a look at your options focusing on US and Canada.

There were waves of Chinese immigrants left Chinese territories (China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) last 60 years. Most of them had went to US, Canada, Australia, Britain and other Anglo Saxon colonial countries.

Using our family as an example, my older brothers and sisters, now in their late 80s and early 90s left Hong Kong for Canada in the 1960s. The reasons they left were the opportunities for education and jobs. That was the same reasons I stayed in the US after college in the 1970s.

Prior to 2010 China were less prosperous compared to US and Canada. Both US and Canada seems to have treated Chinese immigrants rather fairly prior to Obama’s 2012 Pivot to Asia to contain China.

China’s rapid rise since the late 1990s and especially after China joining WTO had made leaving home less attractive, but education and jobs in US and Canada still offered better opportunities. Besides many were joining family members who left home 10-20 years prior. We are frequently referring that as family reunion.

As China continued to rise economically and militarily from 2010 taking a different path not adhering to the so call American’s Colonialist World Order, aka. American Hegemony. US and China amiable relationship start to drift apart slowly.

Most people are not aware of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFA), the Godfather of all think tanks began to produce White Papers such as “Pivot to Asia” also known as “China Containment” White Paper, delivered to President Obama for execution. The escalation of China containment has started with President Obama in 2012 and continued till today.

The external China Containment turns inwards aggressively targeting Chinese living in America, accelerated since President Trump supported by both the Republican and Democratic Parties, mostly Anglo Saxons Politicians. Further escalation since Covid19 blaming everything on Chinese for their own incompetent using Chinese Americans as target promoting hatred and hate crimes against the Chinese community resulting in almost daily attacks against Chinese Americans and Asians throughout America increased by more than 200%.

In the old days, Anglo Saxon racists had to disguise or wear a face mask. Today in the name of homeland security, racists from both Republican and Democratic parties are promoting hatred toward Chinese, Chinese American and China to get votes before, during and after the elections. Making Chinese the enemy of the State is an effective way getting votes at the poll.

Therefore for the same reasons why Chinese came to US last 200 years, it may be time for the same reasons why Chinese should consider returning to their roots, return to China, Hong Kong or Macau especially for those that are smart, educated with special skills and under age 40.

US cannot and will not tolerate or accept Chinese and China, the once considered sick man of East Asia to stand head and shoulder with Anglo Saxon Americans. Allowing that to happen is totally unbearable and unacceptable. The 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act has never gone away, resurrected many times under different names. It is the same bottle different wines.

US is pulling everything from the tool box focusing on destroying China to bring China to her knees to kowtow to the colonial master. Unfortunately the same tools used to destroy Japan in the 1980 and freeze Japan GDP for 30 years till today does not work for China. China is not Japan.

US is having difficulties destroying Russia with the help of NATO, EU, Japan and the Five Eyes. Russia’s GDP is about 1/10 of US. The blow back is actually destroying EU, Japan and the Five Eyes. US has become the sole benefactor.

I am not here to support Russia. But we all know if US successfully destroying Russia, China will be next. The proxy war against China will be fought in Taiwan. American’s objective is to see Chinese killing each others turning Taiwan in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Ukraine and Syria.

If and when a war ever breaks out between US and China, looking back to history at the fate of Japanese American during WWII and Russian Nationals during the current US proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. It is highly likely all Chinese Americans’ assets will be frozen, confiscated and Chinese probably placed in concentration camps like the Japanese American during WWII. It does not matter if you are a Chinese Chinese-haters trying to get brownie points from the Anglo Saxon elites or not. It does not matter because FBI & NSA pull out everyone with a Chinese last name. You will still be on the list.

That is why exit strategy should be planned now and not later. Thousands Miles Home maybe more urgent than you think.

讓我從一個真實的中國故事開始, 我在香港的小學學習過.

在古代，有所謂「孟母三遷」的故事，就是孟子的母親為了給孩子創造一個好的學習環境搬家三次。

第一次搬家剛好在墳墓的旁邊，所以孟子就學會做很多的喪事。孟子的母親見到之後，趕快搬家。

第二次搬到菜市場附近，孟子就學習在那裡賣東西，在那裡賣豬肉。孟母覺得還不是久留之地，趕快再搬遷。

最後搬到學校附近，孟子每天就到學校裡去跟大家一起讀書，這時孟母才覺得比較心安。

假如沒有孟母去選擇了一個好的環境，孟子就不可能成為世間的聖人。所以，一個人學問道德有成就，跟他的父母、老師確實有直接的關係。

孟子是誰？

孟子是中國儒家哲學家，常被稱為“第二聖人”，即僅次於孔子本人。他是孔子第四代弟子中的一員。孟子繼承了孔子的思想並進一步發展。

很明顯，您的環境會影響您當前和未來的生活，尤其是您的子孫後代。

當您的子孫在充滿仇恨, 犯罪、種族主義、合法化的非法毒品、可卡因隨處可見, 槍支、謀殺、盜竊合法化，街頭擠滿了精神問題的無家可歸者, 暴力包括警察對有色人種的暴力的環境中長大，並且因為您的膚色而經常受到白人政治家的抨擊和言語攻擊。如果您是一位母親或祖母，您認為您的子孫後代有光明的未來嗎？

數百萬中國人離開中國的原因與今天中國人應該考慮離開他們在美國和其他白人國家的寄養家庭返回中國的原因相同，為您和您的後代找到一個更好的家, 尤其是那些受過良好教育並具有特殊技能的聰明有頭腦的年輕人。未來，下一個100年的世界是屬於中國、亞洲、印度、中東和非洲。讓我強調一下，離開美國寄養家庭並不適合所有人，尤其是對於資源很少或沒有資源和非技術性藍色工人的退休人員。 因此，您應該仔細研究並與家人討論。

讓我們快速回顧一下，重點關注美國和加拿大。

在過去的40-50 年裡，一波又一波的中國移民離開了中國領土（中國、香港、澳門和台灣）。他們中的大多數人去了美國、加拿大、澳大利亞、英國和其他白人國家。

以我們蔡家為例，我的哥哥姐姐們，現在已經是80 歲和90 歲初，在1960 年代離開香港前往加拿大。他們離開的原因是接受教育和工作的機會。這與我在1970 年代大學畢業後留在美國的原因相同。

中國與美國和加拿大相比，2010 年之前中國的繁榮程度較低。在2012 年奧巴馬“重返亞洲以遏制中國”之前，美國和加拿大似乎都相當公平地對待了中國移民。

中國自1990 年代後期的快速崛起，特別是在中國加入世貿組織之後，已經開始降低了離開中國的吸引力，但美國和加拿大的教育和就業機會仍然提供了更好的機會。此外，許多想要和10 -20年前離家的家庭成員團圓。

隨著中國從2010 年開始在經濟和軍事上崛起，走上了一條和殖民主義國家不同的道路，不遵守所謂的美國殖民主義世界秩序。美中友好關係開始慢慢疏遠。

美國主導的美國霸權。大多數人都不知道外交關係委員會（CFR），它是所有智庫的教父, 每年寫幾十套白皮書，例如“轉向亞洲”也稱為“遏制中國”白皮書，交付給奧巴馬總統執行。遏制中國的升級從2012年奧巴馬總統開始，一直持續到今天。

自從特朗普總統得到共和黨和民主黨（主要是白人）的支持以來，積極遏制中國的極端措施從對外轉向美國內部針對華裔美國人。自從新冠肺炎, 美國自己無能但將一切都歸咎於中國人以華裔美國人為目標, 宣揚針對華人社區的仇恨和仇恨犯罪，導致全美幾乎每天針對華裔美國人和亞裔的襲擊增加了200% 以上。

在過去，白人種族主義者不敢直接攻擊有色人種。今天，以國土安全的名義，共和黨和民主黨的種族主義者都在宣揚對中國人、華裔美國人和中國的仇恨，在選舉之前、推動仇恨是能夠獲得選票的有效途徑。

因此，出於同樣的原因，中國人在過去200 年來到美國從未接受過平等待遇，也許是時候讓中國人回到他們的根源，回到中國、香港或澳門，尤其是那些聰明、受過良好教育且年齡在40 歲以下的人。

美國不能也不會容忍或平等對待中國人和中國，在他們眼裡，中國人還是東亞病夫無法忍受和他們並肩而立. 1882年的排華法案從未消失，今天以不同的名字復活，同一瓶不同的酒。

美國正在把所有東西都從摧毀中國的工具箱裡拿出來，讓中國跪下來向殖民主人磕頭。不幸的是，1980 年用來摧毀日本芯片工業並凍結日本國內生產總值30 年的相同工具對中國不起作用, 中國不是日本。

在北約、歐盟、日本和五眼聯盟的幫助下，美國不能摧毀約占美國國內生產總值1/10俄羅斯。美國以為可以摧毀俄羅斯，但卻摧毀了歐盟，尤其是德國、美國成了唯一受益方。

我不是來支持俄羅斯的。但我們都知道，如果美國成功摧毀俄羅斯，中國將是下一個目標。美國針對中國的代理人戰爭將在台灣上演。美國的目標是看到中國人自相殘殺就像伊拉克、利比亞、阿富汗、烏克蘭和敘利亞把台灣變成一片廢墟。

如果中美之間爆發戰爭，看看二戰期間日裔美國人的命運和當前美國在烏克蘭對俄羅斯的代理人戰爭期間俄羅斯國民的命運。很有可能所有華裔美國人的資產都將被凍結、沒收，中國人可能會像二戰期間發生在日裔美國人身上一樣被關進集中營。如果你是一個討厭中國人的中國人也沒關係，因為聯邦調查局和國家安全局會拉出每個中國人姓氏獲得平等待遇被關進集中營。

這就是為什麼應該現在而不是再等才計劃離開這些殖民主義國家特別是美國的原因。萬里尋根歸家路也許比你想像的更緊迫。你還在等什麼?

Video: Saudi minister scolds Reuters, the mouthpiece of US & British Gov’t from stage for manufacturing fake news propaganda, no wonder Saudi gave Biden the middle finger found China a better friend 沙特部長斥責美英政府喉舌路透社製造假新聞宣傳，難怪沙特對拜登豎中指, 中國才是真朋友
https://rumble.com/v1mw8x8-saudi-minister-scolds-reuters.html
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=805503337339660&id=100036400039778

Video: How US destroyed Hawaii in the past and how US Military Industrial Complex destroying Hawaii today? 美國過去如何摧毀夏威夷，而今天的美國軍事工業園區如何摧毀夏威夷?
https://rumble.com/v1mv601-how-us-destroyed-hawaii-in-the-past-and-how-us-military-industrial-complex-.html
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=805326397357354&id=100036400039778